Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. “Premier Danielle Smith … called the court’s ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.”

“Premier Danielle Smith … called the court’s ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.”

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
abpolidaniellesmithalbertaseparati
11 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
    sanderde@mstdn.ca
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    “Premier Danielle Smith … called the court’s ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.”

    Well Dani, if you’re going to pursue the democratic approach, 480,000 Albertans signed a petition saying they want to remain in Canada and only 300,000 signed one saying they want to leave.

    Why then are you arguing against the judge’s decision, unless you are planning to do the separation referendum against the wishes of a majority of your constituents?

    #abpoli #DanielleSmith #AlbertaSeparatism

    Link Preview Image
    Danielle Smith rejects Alberta judge’s ruling against separation petition as ‘anti-democratic’ | Globalnews.ca

    Premier Danielle Smith is rejecting the ruling of an Alberta judge who quashed a separatist petition and says the province will appeal the court ruling.

    favicon

    Global News (globalnews.ca)

    sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS cthw@mstdn.caC zenheathen@beige.partyZ 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • sanderde@mstdn.caS sanderde@mstdn.ca

      “Premier Danielle Smith … called the court’s ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.”

      Well Dani, if you’re going to pursue the democratic approach, 480,000 Albertans signed a petition saying they want to remain in Canada and only 300,000 signed one saying they want to leave.

      Why then are you arguing against the judge’s decision, unless you are planning to do the separation referendum against the wishes of a majority of your constituents?

      #abpoli #DanielleSmith #AlbertaSeparatism

      Link Preview Image
      Danielle Smith rejects Alberta judge’s ruling against separation petition as ‘anti-democratic’ | Globalnews.ca

      Premier Danielle Smith is rejecting the ruling of an Alberta judge who quashed a separatist petition and says the province will appeal the court ruling.

      favicon

      Global News (globalnews.ca)

      sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      sir_osis_of_liver@beige.party
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @Sanderde

      Moe used to be far and away the dumbest premier. Used to be.

      Smith is doing a full court press to prove me wrong.

      Bitumen Barbi saw Vance mansplain Catholicism to the Pope and figures that's the way to roll, and teach the law and constitution to a friggen judge.

      sanderde@mstdn.caS 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS sir_osis_of_liver@beige.party

        @Sanderde

        Moe used to be far and away the dumbest premier. Used to be.

        Smith is doing a full court press to prove me wrong.

        Bitumen Barbi saw Vance mansplain Catholicism to the Pope and figures that's the way to roll, and teach the law and constitution to a friggen judge.

        sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        sanderde@mstdn.ca
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @Sir_Osis_of_Liver

        I lean towards Dilbit Dani myself.

        sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sanderde@mstdn.caS sanderde@mstdn.ca

          @Sir_Osis_of_Liver

          I lean towards Dilbit Dani myself.

          sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
          sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
          sir_osis_of_liver@beige.party
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Sanderde

          Also good. 👍

          sanderde@mstdn.caS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sir_osis_of_liver@beige.partyS sir_osis_of_liver@beige.party

            @Sanderde

            Also good. 👍

            sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
            sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
            sanderde@mstdn.ca
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @Sir_Osis_of_Liver

            It’s the “diluted” part that works for me.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sanderde@mstdn.caS sanderde@mstdn.ca

              “Premier Danielle Smith … called the court’s ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.”

              Well Dani, if you’re going to pursue the democratic approach, 480,000 Albertans signed a petition saying they want to remain in Canada and only 300,000 signed one saying they want to leave.

              Why then are you arguing against the judge’s decision, unless you are planning to do the separation referendum against the wishes of a majority of your constituents?

              #abpoli #DanielleSmith #AlbertaSeparatism

              Link Preview Image
              Danielle Smith rejects Alberta judge’s ruling against separation petition as ‘anti-democratic’ | Globalnews.ca

              Premier Danielle Smith is rejecting the ruling of an Alberta judge who quashed a separatist petition and says the province will appeal the court ruling.

              favicon

              Global News (globalnews.ca)

              cthw@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
              cthw@mstdn.caC This user is from outside of this forum
              cthw@mstdn.ca
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @Sanderde

              Isn't she the Premier who passed a law that says that any federal law they disagree with will be ignored …
              You know, totally lawless and totally anti-democratic

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • sanderde@mstdn.caS sanderde@mstdn.ca

                “Premier Danielle Smith … called the court’s ruling incorrect in law and anti-democratic.”

                Well Dani, if you’re going to pursue the democratic approach, 480,000 Albertans signed a petition saying they want to remain in Canada and only 300,000 signed one saying they want to leave.

                Why then are you arguing against the judge’s decision, unless you are planning to do the separation referendum against the wishes of a majority of your constituents?

                #abpoli #DanielleSmith #AlbertaSeparatism

                Link Preview Image
                Danielle Smith rejects Alberta judge’s ruling against separation petition as ‘anti-democratic’ | Globalnews.ca

                Premier Danielle Smith is rejecting the ruling of an Alberta judge who quashed a separatist petition and says the province will appeal the court ruling.

                favicon

                Global News (globalnews.ca)

                zenheathen@beige.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                zenheathen@beige.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                zenheathen@beige.party
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @Sanderde It is absolutely not her place to say that a judge is wrong, especially "in law". Doug Ford's pulled the same shit. There should be censures involved. They aren't dictators, they aren't allowed to say shit like that.

                driusan@doomscroller.socialD sanderde@mstdn.caS 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • zenheathen@beige.partyZ zenheathen@beige.party

                  @Sanderde It is absolutely not her place to say that a judge is wrong, especially "in law". Doug Ford's pulled the same shit. There should be censures involved. They aren't dictators, they aren't allowed to say shit like that.

                  driusan@doomscroller.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  driusan@doomscroller.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                  driusan@doomscroller.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8
                  @ZenHeathen@beige.party @Sanderde@mstdn.ca you can say a judge is wrong in law if you're talking about like an Alberta law that you passed or something.. but constitutional law regarding treaty rights? Uh, no.. that's the exact reason the courts are separate from the legislature.
                  zenheathen@beige.partyZ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • zenheathen@beige.partyZ zenheathen@beige.party

                    @Sanderde It is absolutely not her place to say that a judge is wrong, especially "in law". Doug Ford's pulled the same shit. There should be censures involved. They aren't dictators, they aren't allowed to say shit like that.

                    sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sanderde@mstdn.ca
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @ZenHeathen

                    But she has to say it in order to show she’s on the side of the separatist faction of the UCP, as detailed in the Globe article I shared this morning.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • driusan@doomscroller.socialD driusan@doomscroller.social
                      @ZenHeathen@beige.party @Sanderde@mstdn.ca you can say a judge is wrong in law if you're talking about like an Alberta law that you passed or something.. but constitutional law regarding treaty rights? Uh, no.. that's the exact reason the courts are separate from the legislature.
                      zenheathen@beige.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zenheathen@beige.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zenheathen@beige.party
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @driusan @Sanderde I'd still object to the case in your example. She could say "that's not what we intended when we wrote that law", but that just highlights that they wrote it poorly. It is up to the judiciary to interpret the laws on the books.

                      sanderde@mstdn.caS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • zenheathen@beige.partyZ zenheathen@beige.party

                        @driusan @Sanderde I'd still object to the case in your example. She could say "that's not what we intended when we wrote that law", but that just highlights that they wrote it poorly. It is up to the judiciary to interpret the laws on the books.

                        sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sanderde@mstdn.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                        sanderde@mstdn.ca
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @ZenHeathen

                        You can’t expect the Trumpian leader of the UCP to admit their law as written was not perfect.

                        @driusan

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups