On the one hand, this makes sense, since we don't build either.
-
On the one hand, this makes sense, since we don't build either. But on the other hand, given their value and importance, what the hell is the point of the new defence industrial strategy then?
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:exgetftcp33dveaaki5h5bks/post/3mfrfviudah2u -
On the one hand, this makes sense, since we don't build either. But on the other hand, given their value and importance, what the hell is the point of the new defence industrial strategy then?
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:exgetftcp33dveaaki5h5bks/post/3mfrfviudah2uI’ve been around long enough to have witnessed how our current situation is caused in part by repeated rounds of, “The way we’ve been doing things is broken, we’re instituting a new procurement strategy to fix it!” Each time it has meant resetting every clock to zero and pushing back new equipment by years if not decades.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
I’ve been around long enough to have witnessed how our current situation is caused in part by repeated rounds of, “The way we’ve been doing things is broken, we’re instituting a new procurement strategy to fix it!” Each time it has meant resetting every clock to zero and pushing back new equipment by years if not decades.
Fair point.
-
Fair point.
The best approach is some version of: everything past this point will go ahead so as not to waste the sunk costs and keep us moving, while everything earlier than that will be reviewed/revised.
