Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A usage question - do you consider the term "fellows" to be inherently gendered?

A usage question - do you consider the term "fellows" to be inherently gendered?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
languagegender
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
    dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.org
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    A usage question - do you consider the term "fellows" to be inherently gendered?

    i.e. would you read the sentence "some fellows were playing volleyball at the park this morning" to imply men were playing, or people the speaker considers fellow citizens / fellow volleyball fans / etc.?

    #language #gender

    ameliasbrain@mstdn.caA 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.orgD dragonfrog@mastodon.sdf.org

      A usage question - do you consider the term "fellows" to be inherently gendered?

      i.e. would you read the sentence "some fellows were playing volleyball at the park this morning" to imply men were playing, or people the speaker considers fellow citizens / fellow volleyball fans / etc.?

      #language #gender

      ameliasbrain@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
      ameliasbrain@mstdn.caA This user is from outside of this forum
      ameliasbrain@mstdn.ca
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @dragonfrog It annoys me that "fellows" is gendered when it shouldn't be, but yes, it is very much a synonym for "guys" in my lexicon. Except that guys can be sometimes be derogatory/dismissive ("some guys"), while fellows & especially fellas (which I'd be more likely to say) is usually friendly.

      But yeah, it is weird because "fellow" as an adjective is not gendered at all. So the noun should be neutral. But it got adopted into English at a time when the fellows (🀨) using it didn't consider women to be their fellow in social or professional pursuits, so... πŸ˜‘

      And oops, now we've hit semantic satiation. fell-ow fe-llow f'low... πŸ˜΅β€πŸ’«

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups