Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
iposnasdaqindexspacexopenai
71 Posts 40 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

    @iamnotU The churn is gonna look like feeding time at the gator tank.

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    tribactam@social.vivaldi.net
    wrote last edited by
    #57

    @MissConstrue @iamnotU

    when the guy doing the feeding falls in...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

      Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

      Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

      They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

      Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

      They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

      #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

      Link Preview Image
      What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

      SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

      favicon

      Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

      artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
      artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
      artharg@mastodon.nl
      wrote last edited by
      #58

      @MissConstrue Hmmm … so passive index funds will be forced to include the bloatstocks into their portfolios, right? But to make room for that, they will have to sell off much of their current portfolio. Which means downward pressure on all other stocks. Maybe time to buy some put options?

      missconstrue@mefi.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • artharg@mastodon.nlA artharg@mastodon.nl

        @MissConstrue Hmmm … so passive index funds will be forced to include the bloatstocks into their portfolios, right? But to make room for that, they will have to sell off much of their current portfolio. Which means downward pressure on all other stocks. Maybe time to buy some put options?

        missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        missconstrue@mefi.social
        wrote last edited by
        #59

        @ArtHarg I've heard a few analysts say something similar, but I don't have the courage to play the puts and shorts game. I'm more on the dividend aristocrat reinvesting for twenty years side of the board. 😉

        artharg@mastodon.nlA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB beggarmidas@mastodon.social

          @MissConstrue You could also start a petition drive asking the hedge funds to include an investment spread that avoids or only lightly invests in 'high risk' companies forcing premature/irrational market IPOs inclusion. Or hell, just call a spade a spade. Say "X Y Z are forcing high risk investment into medium & lower risk portfolio. We want an index option that specifically discludes companies X Y Z from the index. Get enough signatures on that, hedge fund managers will sit up & take notice

          missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          missconstrue@mefi.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          missconstrue@mefi.social
          wrote last edited by
          #60

          @Beggarmidas There are index and etfs that are not broad spectrum. They're vertical markets that focus on a specific industry or niche.

          indices can get really confusing really fast, which is why most people's funds are in broad market, it spreads out the risk...theoretically. I think these rules make that less true than it was.

          Simple Page

          favicon

          (www.investopedia.com)

          beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

            @ArtHarg I've heard a few analysts say something similar, but I don't have the courage to play the puts and shorts game. I'm more on the dividend aristocrat reinvesting for twenty years side of the board. 😉

            artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
            artharg@mastodon.nlA This user is from outside of this forum
            artharg@mastodon.nl
            wrote last edited by
            #61

            @MissConstrue I never did shorts either. Too risky for my tolerance, since the losses are potentially unbounded. Puts and calls are safer: I stand to lose the cost of the option at most. What is actually fun is to buy call options when you sense a short squeeze coming up. Buying them “out of the money” makes them cheap and then when the short squeeze drives up the price of the asset, you can make a nice profit by selling the option.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

              @Beggarmidas There are index and etfs that are not broad spectrum. They're vertical markets that focus on a specific industry or niche.

              indices can get really confusing really fast, which is why most people's funds are in broad market, it spreads out the risk...theoretically. I think these rules make that less true than it was.

              Simple Page

              favicon

              (www.investopedia.com)

              beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              beggarmidas@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #62

              @MissConstrue It's all very complicated, I suspect by intent to a degree. I mean, we're all pretty well agreed that Crypto is a giant ponzi and that hype around AI has brought in such a level of investment that it's creating it's own special gravity. It's textbook overvalued. Both Crypto & AI have drawn in SO much money, including many deep pockets normally more risk adverse. A bubble popping will almost immediately pop the other as people in a panic create a run cash in their chips.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                @Beggarmidas There are index and etfs that are not broad spectrum. They're vertical markets that focus on a specific industry or niche.

                indices can get really confusing really fast, which is why most people's funds are in broad market, it spreads out the risk...theoretically. I think these rules make that less true than it was.

                Simple Page

                favicon

                (www.investopedia.com)

                beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                beggarmidas@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                beggarmidas@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #63

                @MissConstrue BTW: Love your nick. I had an idea for a character absolutely years ago who in the story had a public nom du guerre like Miss Take or Miss Demeanor or Miss Direction or Miss Teak. All very saucy, almost burlesque stage name adjacent for a screenplay I was working on.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                  @shredder7579 Qualify: I’m not a financial advisor, but as I understand it, passive index is forced to buy shares in any stock listed in the 100.

                  That’s why changing the rules to allow a company that will be 95% privately held to be jammed into every index portfolio is a massive risk to the entire market.

                  Spacex ipo is coming in a valuation that exceed all other military contractors combined. A bigger cap that all of coke, Pepsi, frito, nestle, et al, combined.

                  The SpaceX IPO is expected to be the largest in history, with a targeted valuation between $1.75 trillion and $2 trillion, placing it among the world’s top 10 most valuable companies by market cap. At a $1.75 trillion valuation, SpaceX would rank 8th globally, surpassing companies like Meta, Tesla, and Broadcom, and exceeding Saudi Aramco’s $1.7 trillion IPO in 2019.

                  For a company valued at 1000x earnings. A company that has never made a profit. It’s bugfuck insane. It’s pure grift.

                  cadejohnson@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cadejohnson@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cadejohnson@toot.cat
                  wrote last edited by
                  #64

                  @MissConstrue
                  The point is valid, but the index weighting of the SpaceX stock is not directly determined by market value. Because the company will be mostly privately held, the index will have a weighting factor that reduces the SpaceX proportion of the index. The NASDAQ approach is "aggressive" so SpaceX will still have considerable impact (I think they use 30% of market value for corporation with under 10% public ownership, or something like that). The S&P indexes are less aggressive, and MSCI indexes even less (maybe only accounting the direct public market capitalization in the index?).

                  Interestingly, the SpaceX ipo is expected to depress the index in the prelude to ipo day because everyone knows index funds will be compelled to sell various other holdings at market price to buy ipo shares. Nobody wants to own shares they'll be forced to sell in a buyer's market.

                  @shredder7579

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                    Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

                    Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

                    They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

                    Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

                    They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

                    #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

                    Link Preview Image
                    What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

                    SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

                    favicon

                    Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                    cadejohnson@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cadejohnson@toot.catC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cadejohnson@toot.cat
                    wrote last edited by
                    #65

                    @MissConstrue
                    It is worth mentioning that nobody is FORCED to buy or hold a NASDAQ index fund. If I owned such a fund, I'd move to the sidelines for a while (i.e. switch to a different fund) while these mega-ipo deals play out. fwiw

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                      @shredder7579 Qualify: I’m not a financial advisor, but as I understand it, passive index is forced to buy shares in any stock listed in the 100.

                      That’s why changing the rules to allow a company that will be 95% privately held to be jammed into every index portfolio is a massive risk to the entire market.

                      Spacex ipo is coming in a valuation that exceed all other military contractors combined. A bigger cap that all of coke, Pepsi, frito, nestle, et al, combined.

                      The SpaceX IPO is expected to be the largest in history, with a targeted valuation between $1.75 trillion and $2 trillion, placing it among the world’s top 10 most valuable companies by market cap. At a $1.75 trillion valuation, SpaceX would rank 8th globally, surpassing companies like Meta, Tesla, and Broadcom, and exceeding Saudi Aramco’s $1.7 trillion IPO in 2019.

                      For a company valued at 1000x earnings. A company that has never made a profit. It’s bugfuck insane. It’s pure grift.

                      mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mlanger@mastodon.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #66

                      @MissConstrue @shredder7579 I think having any stock that Elon Musk actively manages is a risk. The guy is unstable and toxic. The IPO is set up to make him even richer than he already is. The company has many unprofitable subsidies. I wouldn't touch SpaceX stock with a 10 foot pole and I certainly would not buy into any fund that included it. (1/2)

                      mlanger@mastodon.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mlanger@mastodon.worldM mlanger@mastodon.world

                        @MissConstrue @shredder7579 I think having any stock that Elon Musk actively manages is a risk. The guy is unstable and toxic. The IPO is set up to make him even richer than he already is. The company has many unprofitable subsidies. I wouldn't touch SpaceX stock with a 10 foot pole and I certainly would not buy into any fund that included it. (1/2)

                        mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mlanger@mastodon.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mlanger@mastodon.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #67

                        I am slowly moving all of my retirement investments out of the stock market and into FDIC insured CDs. Yes, I know the potential for profit is much lower, but I also know that the risk is basically nonexistent. It's all going to come tumbling down and I'm not going to let it take my retirement funds with it. (2/2)
                        @MissConstrue @shredder7579

                        soojinl@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                          @shredder7579 Qualify: I’m not a financial advisor, but as I understand it, passive index is forced to buy shares in any stock listed in the 100.

                          That’s why changing the rules to allow a company that will be 95% privately held to be jammed into every index portfolio is a massive risk to the entire market.

                          Spacex ipo is coming in a valuation that exceed all other military contractors combined. A bigger cap that all of coke, Pepsi, frito, nestle, et al, combined.

                          The SpaceX IPO is expected to be the largest in history, with a targeted valuation between $1.75 trillion and $2 trillion, placing it among the world’s top 10 most valuable companies by market cap. At a $1.75 trillion valuation, SpaceX would rank 8th globally, surpassing companies like Meta, Tesla, and Broadcom, and exceeding Saudi Aramco’s $1.7 trillion IPO in 2019.

                          For a company valued at 1000x earnings. A company that has never made a profit. It’s bugfuck insane. It’s pure grift.

                          atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                          atleagle@mastodon.onlineA This user is from outside of this forum
                          atleagle@mastodon.online
                          wrote last edited by
                          #68

                          @MissConstrue @shredder7579 those numbers are silly. That is just blatantly making things up out of thin air. People aren't going to only lose faith in markets, they're going to stop believing in money

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                            Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

                            Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

                            They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

                            Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

                            They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

                            #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

                            Link Preview Image
                            What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

                            SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

                            favicon

                            Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                            kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kkarhan@c.imK This user is from outside of this forum
                            kkarhan@c.im
                            wrote last edited by
                            #69

                            @MissConstrue so YET ANOTHER REASON* why #retirements should not be contingent on #StockTrading and #Stocks in general!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mlanger@mastodon.worldM mlanger@mastodon.world

                              I am slowly moving all of my retirement investments out of the stock market and into FDIC insured CDs. Yes, I know the potential for profit is much lower, but I also know that the risk is basically nonexistent. It's all going to come tumbling down and I'm not going to let it take my retirement funds with it. (2/2)
                              @MissConstrue @shredder7579

                              soojinl@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              soojinl@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                              soojinl@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #70

                              @mlanger @MissConstrue @shredder7579 I’ve been doing the same for the past couple of years. Also been spreading across multiple financial institutions to ensure all my retirement funds are fully FDIC insured and reduce risk with an individual financial institution failure.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • missconstrue@mefi.socialM missconstrue@mefi.social

                                Y’all, we need to talk about upcoming #IPOs, and the insane rule changes that #nasdaq has just announced.

                                Nasdaq rewrote its #index inclusion rules to accommodate #SpaceX’s mega-IPO, implementing a "Fast Entry" provision that allows the company to join the Nasdaq-100 index just 15 trading days after its initial public offering, down from the standard three-month seasoning period.

                                They also eliminated the minimum float requirement of 20% available public shares and instead stocks with less than 20% of shares publicly traded, Nasdaq applies a 3x multiplier to the free-float for index weighting purposes, artificially inflating low-float giants like SpaceX in passive funds.

                                Ok, but in English? #SpaceX, #OpenAI and #Anthropic have just figured out a scam to force every passive #IRA, #401k, and index fund to buy their stock before pricing evaluation.

                                They’ve figured out how to steal your #retirement.

                                #AI #LLM #Scam #guillotines #YouWillOwnNothing

                                Link Preview Image
                                What the SpaceX IPO means for markets

                                SpaceX's IPO filing has arrived. Elon Musk's rocket company is set to reshape the market when it goes public, with impacts at the index level and beyond.

                                favicon

                                Business Insider (www.businessinsider.com)

                                justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                justinderrick@mstdn.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #71

                                @MissConstrue This is the exit plan for everyone who has propped up Elon's ignorance and stupidity over the past decade... The twitter purchase and subsequent collapse in value, xAI's disaster as a product, Tesla's inability to ship the 'Full Self Driving' that was promised to be delivered 6+ years ago...

                                This is all wrapped up in Elon's only truly successful venture, SpaceX -- and once all of Wall Street and billionaire middle-eastern princes exit... Then everything falls to the ground and explodes, much like the majority of the starship launches.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups