Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Simon Tisdall sets out the betrayal of Ukraine by the US, starting (rightly) with the failure to uphold the so-called 'security guarantees' offered by President Clinton to ensure that Ukraine gave up it nuclear weapons on independence...

Simon Tisdall sets out the betrayal of Ukraine by the US, starting (rightly) with the failure to uphold the so-called 'security guarantees' offered by President Clinton to ensure that Ukraine gave up it nuclear weapons on independence...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
ukrainepolitics
13 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

    Simon Tisdall sets out the betrayal of Ukraine by the US, starting (rightly) with the failure to uphold the so-called 'security guarantees' offered by President Clinton to ensure that Ukraine gave up it nuclear weapons on independence...

    How different the situation would have looked if those guarantees had actually been fulfilled (or of course, Ukraine had kept the nukes stationed on its soil).

    Who now would believe anything the US 'guaranteed'?

    #Ukraine #politics
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/21/ukraine-us-betrayal-donald-trump-vladimir-putin

    grumpydad@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
    grumpydad@infosec.exchangeG This user is from outside of this forum
    grumpydad@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @ChrisMayLA6 Deals with the US should now be seen as null and void

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • infoseepage@mastodon.socialI infoseepage@mastodon.social

      @ChrisMayLA6 Everything the US has done since then has made the situation worse. We're no longer any sort of partner on security. We're a danger to keep in the loop on intelligence and potential source of extortion if a nation relies too heavily on US made weapons systems (or anything else). We're no longer the indispensable nation, we're a nation that countries are scrambling to disentangle themselves from while whispering soothing noises at our mad king.

      infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
      infoseepage@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @ChrisMayLA6 And every US action under Trump has underscored the value of keeping nuclear programs from prying eyes and delivering one's status as member of the nuclear club as a fair accompli. Trump has killed nuclear non proliferation and IAEA inspection.

      infoseepage@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • infoseepage@mastodon.socialI infoseepage@mastodon.social

        @ChrisMayLA6 And every US action under Trump has underscored the value of keeping nuclear programs from prying eyes and delivering one's status as member of the nuclear club as a fair accompli. Trump has killed nuclear non proliferation and IAEA inspection.

        infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        infoseepage@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @ChrisMayLA6 We're in a position of probably needing to launch a massive ground invasion of Iran to actually prevent them from crossing the nuclear finishing line (assuming they haven't simply built ~3 WW2 class devices out of sub weapon's grade material). We used up most of the US stockpile of deep strike conventional munitions, so the alternative for no boots on the ground is basically tactical nukes. Assuming we knew where all the facilities were.

        chrismayla6@zirk.usC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • infoseepage@mastodon.socialI infoseepage@mastodon.social

          @ChrisMayLA6 Everything the US has done since then has made the situation worse. We're no longer any sort of partner on security. We're a danger to keep in the loop on intelligence and potential source of extortion if a nation relies too heavily on US made weapons systems (or anything else). We're no longer the indispensable nation, we're a nation that countries are scrambling to disentangle themselves from while whispering soothing noises at our mad king.

          captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
          captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC This user is from outside of this forum
          captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.world
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @Infoseepage @ChrisMayLA6

          perhaps in the long term, trump has accidentally done the world a favour.

          chrismayla6@zirk.usC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • infoseepage@mastodon.socialI infoseepage@mastodon.social

            @ChrisMayLA6 We're in a position of probably needing to launch a massive ground invasion of Iran to actually prevent them from crossing the nuclear finishing line (assuming they haven't simply built ~3 WW2 class devices out of sub weapon's grade material). We used up most of the US stockpile of deep strike conventional munitions, so the alternative for no boots on the ground is basically tactical nukes. Assuming we knew where all the facilities were.

            chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
            chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
            chrismayla6@zirk.us
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @Infoseepage

            And of course, as discussed earlier this week, in Tehran a war is seen as both survivable but also possibly bettering their bargaining position as the US will fatigue quite quickly of the aggressions & response(s)

            infoseepage@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.worldC captain_jack_sparrow@mastodon.world

              @Infoseepage @ChrisMayLA6

              perhaps in the long term, trump has accidentally done the world a favour.

              chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
              chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
              chrismayla6@zirk.us
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @Captain_Jack_Sparrow @Infoseepage

              if so, it certainly will have been an accident

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                @Infoseepage

                And of course, as discussed earlier this week, in Tehran a war is seen as both survivable but also possibly bettering their bargaining position as the US will fatigue quite quickly of the aggressions & response(s)

                infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                infoseepage@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                @ChrisMayLA6 Saying this as I sit with my ass planted in Serbia, I wonder if Trump's regime thinks the situation on the ground is fluid enough that Iran's regime could be tilted towards falling like Yugoslavia's was after the 1999 NATO bombing campaign, which significantly weakened Milošević's hold on power.

                chrismayla6@zirk.usC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • infoseepage@mastodon.socialI infoseepage@mastodon.social

                  @ChrisMayLA6 Saying this as I sit with my ass planted in Serbia, I wonder if Trump's regime thinks the situation on the ground is fluid enough that Iran's regime could be tilted towards falling like Yugoslavia's was after the 1999 NATO bombing campaign, which significantly weakened Milošević's hold on power.

                  chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chrismayla6@zirk.usC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chrismayla6@zirk.us
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @Infoseepage

                  Its possible that's the shining behind the move, but I think they may misapprehend the Iranian population's suspicion of the US as a 'saviour' - certainly Iran is ripe for political reform, but whether that could be 'supercharged' by a bombing campaign? Iranians may well be galvanised to huddle round the regime rather than reject it?

                  infoseepage@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                    @Infoseepage

                    Its possible that's the shining behind the move, but I think they may misapprehend the Iranian population's suspicion of the US as a 'saviour' - certainly Iran is ripe for political reform, but whether that could be 'supercharged' by a bombing campaign? Iranians may well be galvanised to huddle round the regime rather than reject it?

                    infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                    infoseepage@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                    infoseepage@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @ChrisMayLA6 They've had recent large scale protests there which seemed to have had a restoration of the monarchy bent to them (or at least that's what the monarchists wishing to be restored to power have claimed). But how many of the people who lead those protests are now dead or in jail? The US may have missed its window due to poor timing/preparedness. Even if the regime were overthrown, no guarantee what emerges in its place would be in any way in line with what the Trump regime wants.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • chrismayla6@zirk.usC chrismayla6@zirk.us

                      Simon Tisdall sets out the betrayal of Ukraine by the US, starting (rightly) with the failure to uphold the so-called 'security guarantees' offered by President Clinton to ensure that Ukraine gave up it nuclear weapons on independence...

                      How different the situation would have looked if those guarantees had actually been fulfilled (or of course, Ukraine had kept the nukes stationed on its soil).

                      Who now would believe anything the US 'guaranteed'?

                      #Ukraine #politics
                      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/21/ukraine-us-betrayal-donald-trump-vladimir-putin

                      hoare_spitall@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hoare_spitall@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hoare_spitall@mastodon.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @ChrisMayLA6 This might not be the most fitting response to your very much welcomed post. I was going to write "Only a fool" to your final question, but this is the most emotional, soulful rendition of foolishness I know of, and echoes my feelings of deep sorrow about what MAGA, and the Trump baboon truppe's deceit have done to the Ukrainian people.

                      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=D-sQiySX79g

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups