Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Let's be clear.

Let's be clear.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
32 Posts 25 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

    Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

    Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

    That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

    Link Preview Image
    The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

    The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

    favicon

    Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

    pedestrianerror@towns.gayP This user is from outside of this forum
    pedestrianerror@towns.gayP This user is from outside of this forum
    pedestrianerror@towns.gay
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @QasimRashid If this doesn't prove to women that complying with patriarchy (in this case, by marrying and taking husbands' names) to avoid conflict and be granted limited privileges is a really bad plan, I don't know what will.

    crissa@meow.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

      Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

      Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

      That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

      Link Preview Image
      The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

      The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

      favicon

      Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

      robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      robo105@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @QasimRashid This is a case where ideology is more important than being patriotic to your country

      huntn00@mastodon.worldH 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
        R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
      • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

        Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

        Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

        That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

        Link Preview Image
        The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

        The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

        favicon

        Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

        a_minion@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        a_minion@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        a_minion@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @QasimRashid

        The tiny minded are at it again. The SAVE act. Anyone who understands how our voting is done knows that fraud on a voter level is almost impossible. Only the morons that follow de Fuhrer think it's ever been done.

        So I propose a way to fix all the problems:

        All American Citizens outsides the US & "Everyone" in the nation can vote, in the same way everyone has judicial rights.

        We can call it the "Save Us From Idiots" voting law. SUFI Yea, I'm not really good at Anachronisms.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

          Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

          Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

          That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

          Link Preview Image
          The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

          The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

          favicon

          Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

          glassdelusion@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          glassdelusion@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          glassdelusion@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @QasimRashid And 5 million adoptees expected to dig up birth certificates? When only 16 states five adoptees access?!?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

            Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

            Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

            That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

            Link Preview Image
            The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

            The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

            favicon

            Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

            decapitae@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            decapitae@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            decapitae@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @QasimRashid Let's hope this next act of cruelty and anti-intellect evaporates.... I mean since they've completely chucked legitimacy and are going for rule by force - it's mostly even unnecessary to do something stupid like trying to roll back voters rights. Just put the damned swastika arm bands on already.. 🤦

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bishop6@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
              bishop6@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
              bishop6@mastodon.online
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @Dwebster @QasimRashid Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • remywhisker@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                remywhisker@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                remywhisker@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @Dwebster @QasimRashid By requiring documents that most either do not have or do not match their current name (for example married women using their husband's last name). Also I suggest reading up on administrative burden and how it is used to deny service. Also, also the numbers just don't make sense. To stop maybe a few hundred illegal votes, you would prevent millions from voting. That's just straight up absurd

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • robo105@mastodon.socialR robo105@mastodon.social

                  @QasimRashid This is a case where ideology is more important than being patriotic to your country

                  huntn00@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                  huntn00@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                  huntn00@mastodon.world
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @Robo105 @QasimRashid Holding, exercising power over others in a former democracy. 🔥🤬

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • bishop6@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bishop6@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bishop6@mastodon.online
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @Dwebster @QasimRashid A bill's effects are more than simply its text, which anyone with any sense knows.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • huntn00@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                      huntn00@mastodon.worldH This user is from outside of this forum
                      huntn00@mastodon.world
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @Dwebster @remywhisker @QasimRashid “Millions trying to vote illegally with the encouragement of democrats”
                      Sadly you just impeached yourself. Layoff the Rightwing Koolaid, your perception will skew back to reality.

                      wavefunction@mastodon.sdf.orgW 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bishop6@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bishop6@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bishop6@mastodon.online
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @Dwebster @Huntn00 @remywhisker @QasimRashid "Impeach" can also mean "to call into question" or "to discredit." The irony of telling someone else to "learn the definition of words" when you haven't cared to do so yourself...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • huntn00@mastodon.worldH huntn00@mastodon.world

                          @Dwebster @remywhisker @QasimRashid “Millions trying to vote illegally with the encouragement of democrats”
                          Sadly you just impeached yourself. Layoff the Rightwing Koolaid, your perception will skew back to reality.

                          wavefunction@mastodon.sdf.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wavefunction@mastodon.sdf.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                          wavefunction@mastodon.sdf.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          @Huntn00 @remywhisker @QasimRashid don't engage the bot accounts.

                          huntn00@mastodon.worldH 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                            Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

                            Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

                            That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

                            Link Preview Image
                            The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

                            The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

                            favicon

                            Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

                            endicottauthor@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            endicottauthor@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                            endicottauthor@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @QasimRashid What was that about election interference?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                              Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

                              Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

                              That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

                              Link Preview Image
                              The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

                              The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

                              favicon

                              Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

                              maxoakland@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maxoakland@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maxoakland@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              @QasimRashid Let’s sound the alarm and get this blocked. We can do it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                                Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

                                Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

                                That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

                                Link Preview Image
                                The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

                                The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

                                favicon

                                Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

                                maxoakland@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                maxoakland@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                maxoakland@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #16

                                @QasimRashid what’s our plan to stop this?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                                  Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

                                  Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

                                  That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

                                  The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

                                  favicon

                                  Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

                                  alandvalonline@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alandvalonline@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  alandvalonline@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #17

                                  @QasimRashid Elect enoujgh women to Congress and the Senate and they might just End Men.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • pedestrianerror@towns.gayP pedestrianerror@towns.gay

                                    @QasimRashid If this doesn't prove to women that complying with patriarchy (in this case, by marrying and taking husbands' names) to avoid conflict and be granted limited privileges is a really bad plan, I don't know what will.

                                    crissa@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    crissa@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    crissa@meow.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @PedestrianError @QasimRashid
                                    Sharing a name short-circuits so many difficulties in day to day life - from sharing bank or credit accounts to insurance to visitation at hospitals or even just dealing with paying utility bills.

                                    This also applies to adopted children, orphaned, or step children just as much as women.

                                    To pretend that it has no advantages to change is just as blind as to say it should be required to change.

                                    As someone who has changed her name more than once - people should have the name they want.

                                    This is designed to disenfranchise everyone who's not had a perfect white Christian male life.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • crissa@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      crissa@meow.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      crissa@meow.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #19

                                      @LukefromDC @QasimRashid
                                      If every Republican Senator seat all lost it would be enough to remove him from office. Highly unlikely but not actually mathematically ruled out.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • raptor85@mastodon.gamedev.placeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        raptor85@mastodon.gamedev.placeR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        raptor85@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @Dwebster @QasimRashid Proof of US citizenship is ALREADY required, that's not what this bill does, this adds requirements that are specifically targeted towards women (matching LAST name on birth certificate/passport) which can take MONTHS to get processed and if you don't live in your birth state cost hundreds of dollars... especially if there's a rush on the services. Around 40 million people will be affected by this, this is nothing more than mass voter suppression.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                                          Let's be clear. Republicans are passing the deceptively named SAVE Act not because they can point to any form of systemic voter or Election fraud, but because it will disenfranchise tens of millions of women and minorities.

                                          Since 1992, women have voted blue by 4 to 13 points. So rather than changing their policies to earn women's votes, they're changing the rules to prevent women's votes.

                                          That's not democracy. That's dictatorship. That's MAGA.

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          The SAVE Act Will End Voting Rights for Women in America

                                          The SAVE Act has passed the House—we cannot let it pass the Senate On February 11, MAGA Republicans in the House passed the deceptively named SAVE Act. I warned about this ludicrous piece of legislation when MAGAs first introduced it in 2024, even though it had no chance of

                                          favicon

                                          Let's Address This with Qasim Rashid (lets-address-this-with-qasim-rashid.ghost.io)

                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          H This user is from outside of this forum
                                          harrymutt@social.vivaldi.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Funny how two can do the same and mean something completely different. Here in Germany and much of Europe, showing your ID and proving you are a citizen is completely normal in the poll station.

                                          But this only works because registration at the place of residence is mandatory, resulting in everybody having an ID. Voting here is SOOO easy because you automatically get a notice in your mail 6 weeks before the next election telling you the exact location and the date of the vote. Nobody tries to take away that right, nobody tries to intimidate voters, nobody tries to make voting harder. Quite the opposite, there are significantly more poll stations per capita than in the states, and you never have to wait for more than a few minutes to cast your vote. Name changes like when marrying is no problem at all. Why should it be?

                                          Now, when the orange gangsters want to introduce the voting part of that system without implementing the registration part, it's very clear, they don't want to make voting easy. Only they can take a good system and use it to introduce more obstacles into the voting process. How disgusting these people are...

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups