Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles!

My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
wikipedia
61 Posts 41 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

    My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

    Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

    Link Preview Image
    Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

    favicon

    (en.wikipedia.org)

    f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
    f4grx@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #19

    @quarknova THANK YOU ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • k@chaos.socialK k@chaos.social

      @quarknova Now, on to the hard part - detection and enforcement.

      f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      f4grx@chaos.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      f4grx@chaos.social
      wrote last edited by
      #20

      @k @quarknova there are article changelogs.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

        @indutny Please keep us posted! I would love for this to become a greater movement, and I'm here if you need any support!

        indutny@mean.engineerI This user is from outside of this forum
        indutny@mean.engineerI This user is from outside of this forum
        indutny@mean.engineer
        wrote last edited by
        #21

        @quarknova will do!

        The vote is in two weeks, and I'm doing all I can to gather support for AI opposition with the petition I created.

        Thank you for support!

        appagalcrochet@mstdn.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

          My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

          Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

          Link Preview Image
          Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

          favicon

          (en.wikipedia.org)

          jessamyn@glammr.usJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jessamyn@glammr.usJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jessamyn@glammr.us
          wrote last edited by
          #22

          @quarknova Congrats, that is a lot of hard work getting those through.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

            My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

            Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

            Link Preview Image
            Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

            favicon

            (en.wikipedia.org)

            morningsong@weirder.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
            morningsong@weirder.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
            morningsong@weirder.earth
            wrote last edited by
            #23

            @quarknova Oh thank gods I was terrified about this.

            morningsong@weirder.earthM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • morningsong@weirder.earthM morningsong@weirder.earth

              @quarknova Oh thank gods I was terrified about this.

              morningsong@weirder.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
              morningsong@weirder.earthM This user is from outside of this forum
              morningsong@weirder.earth
              wrote last edited by
              #24

              @quarknova thank you and everyone else who helped for getting this passed.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                Link Preview Image
                Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                favicon

                (en.wikipedia.org)

                educoder@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                educoder@mastodon.onlineE This user is from outside of this forum
                educoder@mastodon.online
                wrote last edited by
                #25

                @quarknova Wikipedia continues to demonstrate that humanity can just decide to create something wonderful, but it takes real dedication to protect that beauty from those who would take advantage. Thank you for your hard work safeguarding this bastion of collaboration.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                  My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                  Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                  Link Preview Image
                  Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                  favicon

                  (en.wikipedia.org)

                  dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #26

                  Link Preview Image
                  Rage Emoji GIF - Rage emoji Rage - Discover & Share GIFs

                  The perfect Rage emoji Rage Animated GIF for your conversation. Discover and Share the best GIFs on Tenor.

                  favicon

                  Tenor (tenor.com)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                    My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                    Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                    Link Preview Image
                    Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    solardavy@climatejustice.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    solardavy@climatejustice.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                    solardavy@climatejustice.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #27

                    @quarknova

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                      My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                      Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                      Link Preview Image
                      Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                      favicon

                      (en.wikipedia.org)

                      yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yoasif@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #28

                      @quarknova I think that unfortunately, this policy is exactly what big tech wants - fresh training knowledge and training data from humans, which the tech companies are free to remix into new public domain works that are not protected by share-alike.

                      With this policy, Wikipedia demands that humans work for the bots for free, and the humans can't even take advantage of the bots to work against the theft of the commons.

                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD exa@mastodon.onlineE 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                        My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                        Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                        Link Preview Image
                        Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                        favicon

                        (en.wikipedia.org)

                        bodomenke@hessen.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bodomenke@hessen.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        bodomenke@hessen.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #29

                        @quarknova @robpike I am not sure that this will work out.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                        • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                          @quarknova I think that unfortunately, this policy is exactly what big tech wants - fresh training knowledge and training data from humans, which the tech companies are free to remix into new public domain works that are not protected by share-alike.

                          With this policy, Wikipedia demands that humans work for the bots for free, and the humans can't even take advantage of the bots to work against the theft of the commons.

                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dalias@hachyderm.io
                          wrote last edited by
                          #30

                          @yoasif @quarknova You have no idea what you're talking about. There is no way for humans to "take advantage of the bots to work against the theft of the commons". Slop-spewing bots cannot magically create new knowledge of the real world. All they can do is remix things that were already written and scooped up into their training set to make something that sounds plausible but that has no provenance.

                          Yes, malevolent capitalists will continue to scrape and attempt to enclose the commons. We fight them and continue to maintain the things we need and that nourish us. We don't destroy our own treasures to keep them from copying.

                          yoasif@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                            @yoasif @quarknova You have no idea what you're talking about. There is no way for humans to "take advantage of the bots to work against the theft of the commons". Slop-spewing bots cannot magically create new knowledge of the real world. All they can do is remix things that were already written and scooped up into their training set to make something that sounds plausible but that has no provenance.

                            Yes, malevolent capitalists will continue to scrape and attempt to enclose the commons. We fight them and continue to maintain the things we need and that nourish us. We don't destroy our own treasures to keep them from copying.

                            yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                            yoasif@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #31

                            @dalias @quarknova I don't actually believe that the bots can generate knowledge, but that is what we are told.

                            The lie is revealed with the demand for real human knowledge.

                            It isn't "malevolent capitalists" -- it is Wikipedia that has sold out its community: https://www.avclub.com/wikipedia-ai-partnerships-meta-amazon-microsoft

                            If it is good for the goose, why isn't good enough for the gander?

                            More precisely, why continue to contribute to Wikipedia when they have preemptively sold out the commons?

                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                              My genuine hope is that this can spark a broader change. Empower communities on other platforms, and see this become a grassroots movement of users deciding whether AI should be welcome in their communities, and to what extent. On their own terms.

                              A pushback against the #enshittification and forceful push of AI by so many companies in these last few years.

                              yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                              yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                              yoasif@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #32

                              @quarknova I would say that the battle was lost when Wikipedia allowed big tech to buy access to copyleft content without needing to share alike.

                              Your new policy simply enforces "fresh meat" for the models, without any requirement for reciprocity back to the commons.

                              Wikipedians then, are signing up to work for free to feed the models, while people downstream from the models can use their labor entirely for free without giving back.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                                My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                                Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                                Link Preview Image
                                Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                                favicon

                                (en.wikipedia.org)

                                elduvelle@neuromatch.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                elduvelle@neuromatch.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                elduvelle@neuromatch.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #33

                                @quarknova yes!! 👏👏👏

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                                  @dalias @quarknova I don't actually believe that the bots can generate knowledge, but that is what we are told.

                                  The lie is revealed with the demand for real human knowledge.

                                  It isn't "malevolent capitalists" -- it is Wikipedia that has sold out its community: https://www.avclub.com/wikipedia-ai-partnerships-meta-amazon-microsoft

                                  If it is good for the goose, why isn't good enough for the gander?

                                  More precisely, why continue to contribute to Wikipedia when they have preemptively sold out the commons?

                                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dalias@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #34

                                  @yoasif @quarknova That was a mistake, for complex reasons. But it doesn't justify burning down commons that you don't have the means to replicate outside of the organization at present.

                                  yoasif@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                                    My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                                    Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                                    favicon

                                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                                    lykrast@eldritch.cafeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lykrast@eldritch.cafeL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    lykrast@eldritch.cafe
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #35

                                    @quarknova yay 🎉

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                                      @yoasif @quarknova That was a mistake, for complex reasons. But it doesn't justify burning down commons that you don't have the means to replicate outside of the organization at present.

                                      yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      yoasif@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                                      yoasif@mastodon.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #36

                                      @dalias @quarknova I mean, forks could exist.

                                      Forks wouldn't have a deal for big tech to opt out of share-alike, so we could conceivably see better stewards for this repository of knowledge than the Jimmy Wales crew.

                                      As it is, contributing directly to Wikipedia constitutes a tacit acknowledgement of a rejection of the license that your contributions are nominally contributed under; Wikipedia has opted you out, even if you haven't.

                                      - YouTube

                                      Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

                                      favicon

                                      (www.youtube.com)

                                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • quarknova@wikis.worldQ quarknova@wikis.world

                                        My #Wikipedia request for comment just closed, finally banning #AI content in articles! "The use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"

                                        Kudos to all who participated in writing the guideline (especially Kowal2701) and the whole WikiProject AI Cleanup team, this was very much a group effort!

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models/RfC - Wikipedia

                                        favicon

                                        (en.wikipedia.org)

                                        2something@transfem.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                        2something@transfem.social2 This user is from outside of this forum
                                        2something@transfem.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #37

                                        @quarknova@wikis.world Thank you.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • yoasif@mastodon.socialY yoasif@mastodon.social

                                          @dalias @quarknova I mean, forks could exist.

                                          Forks wouldn't have a deal for big tech to opt out of share-alike, so we could conceivably see better stewards for this repository of knowledge than the Jimmy Wales crew.

                                          As it is, contributing directly to Wikipedia constitutes a tacit acknowledgement of a rejection of the license that your contributions are nominally contributed under; Wikipedia has opted you out, even if you haven't.

                                          - YouTube

                                          Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.

                                          favicon

                                          (www.youtube.com)

                                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dalias@hachyderm.io
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #38

                                          @yoasif @quarknova Even if you don't want to contribute to Wikipedia for these reasons (completely legitimate), you should want it not to be burned to the ground by LLM slop in the absence of any viable fork to replace it. The policy banning LLM slop benefits us all by preserving a commons that was built before the very unfortunately and shortsighted choice the org made.

                                          yoasif@mastodon.socialY 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups