Request for input

[asprinkleofsage@mastodon.social]

@elrohir @randahl great minds think alike!

[taatm@mathstodon.xyz]

@randahl
You can tell them that with the greatest respect, they can fuck off.

That should do it.

You know you can never convince someone of the truth if they really want the lie to be true.

Emotions have been around longer and intelligence is on top of it, so emotions rule. Always has.

[paulk@writing.exchange]

@randahl Include a few bloopers, perhaps. Unless you are perfect in 1 go, that should work.

And otherwise create some bloopers.

[asprinkleofsage@mastodon.social]

@randahl make up some new words (preferably obscene) on the show, like "Putin is a cuntwaffle"

[gryzor@androiddev.social]

@randahl just show that you don't have six fingers

[shuro@friends.deko.cloud]

@randahl nothing.

[urbanedm@yeg.bike]

@randahl This has been a thing for as long as the internet has been around. 15 years it was people calling "photoshop" on everything, today it's "AI."

It's tough to get people to understand what the tells of a fake actually are, and even the best spotters will have some false positives.

"We can't know what's true" is part of the point of disinformation, and by far the hardest one to counter.

[davidnielsen@mastodon.social]

@randahl lean into it, claim to not be AI but a lizard man in a human suit.

[txtx@mastodon.social]

@sjsmac I doubt that normal people think @randahl is AI generated...more likely these are troll factory workers/bots doing their work.

[wesdym@mastodon.social]

@randahl I would say you can't, and there's no point in trying. It would be a pointless distraction.

The poor writing in your example suggests someone who's not well educated, or at least not challenged in their education to make more effort. It's lazy, and suggests lazy thinking. You can't do much for lazy thinkers. They have to participate in the effort, and they're clearly unwilling or unable to.

[gneilyo@mastodon.online]

@randahl This calls for a Bugs Bunny polemic

[marcr@social.tchncs.de]

@randahl Erm, is that comment maybe referring to that automated AI translation voice over by Youtube? Maybe these persons don't know how to turn it off.

[erikmenzel@social.edu.nl]

@randahl
I think there is no way to convince those people.
Any attempt to prove you are not AI will probably be interpreted as proof of you being AI.
It reminds me of the wise words of the great philosopher yogi bear
“The deeper you go into the woods, the more nuts you will find.”

[dave@europhiles.uk]

@randahl
You could politely point out in Dansk (and whatever other languages you speak other than English) that the commenters are rude <plural expletive of choice>.

[randulo@mastodon.social]

@randahl It's funny, the wave of people who talk to their chatgpt as mates and their opposites who see every thing as AI-generated will never meet. The ultimate truth is that this is well-presented and researched.. Even if it was generated by AI, it would be as valid as if it was created by a high school student.
Perfect presentation and editing. I do not find the accent to be strong, but quite light.
Regardless of it all, the call to action at the end is lucid: vote. Democracy depends on it.

[rjohnston@techhub.social]

@randahl Check a box.

[erwinrossen@mas.to]

@randahl Won't referring to your older videos (from before generating video was so easy) not be enough?

[elcelio@mastodon.uno]

@randahl @sjsmac
the best of your videos ever. btw.

[eetschrijver@mastodon.social]

@randahl Interesting one should address comments to an AI generated character.

[troed@masto.sangberg.se]

@randahl Your production quality is top notch which some AI-haters have problems believing humans can do.

You'll just have to start the next video climbing out of bed, bad hairdo, putting on coffee and mutter something unintelligible like the rest of us before shaping up