Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year.

I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 23 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mike@thecanadian.socialM mike@thecanadian.social

    @cwebber I'm not advocating replacing humans but I think the business case would be that an AI doesn't sleep, eat, take breaks, get sick, go on holiday or require a raise every year. Also an employer pays more than your salary, the line item for a human resource is salary plus payroll tax, and benefits. so it's usually your gross salary plus 30%.
    I really do get where you're coming from though. AI should be a force multiplier not an excuse to layoff staff.

    cargot_robbie@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cargot_robbie@urbanists.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    cargot_robbie@urbanists.social
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    @mike Is it true that AI won't require a raise every year? I wouldn't be surprised that executives would think that, but it seems like token price inflation would be a lot harder for companies to mitigate than it has been for them to suppress wages. AI has the whole multi-billion dollar company apparatus behind it, most employees are lucky if they can afford an employment lawyer to read their contracts.

    @cwebber

    mike@thecanadian.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cargot_robbie@urbanists.socialC cargot_robbie@urbanists.social

      @mike Is it true that AI won't require a raise every year? I wouldn't be surprised that executives would think that, but it seems like token price inflation would be a lot harder for companies to mitigate than it has been for them to suppress wages. AI has the whole multi-billion dollar company apparatus behind it, most employees are lucky if they can afford an employment lawyer to read their contracts.

      @cwebber

      mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mike@thecanadian.social
      wrote last edited by
      #23

      @cargot_robbie @cwebber Fair point

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mike@thecanadian.socialM mike@thecanadian.social

        @cwebber I'm not advocating replacing humans but I think the business case would be that an AI doesn't sleep, eat, take breaks, get sick, go on holiday or require a raise every year. Also an employer pays more than your salary, the line item for a human resource is salary plus payroll tax, and benefits. so it's usually your gross salary plus 30%.
        I really do get where you're coming from though. AI should be a force multiplier not an excuse to layoff staff.

        n1xnx@tilde.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
        n1xnx@tilde.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
        n1xnx@tilde.zone
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @mike @cwebber
        Of course, the OTHER thing AI doesn't do is learn from its mistakes (that humans had to clean up after).

        mike@thecanadian.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • n1xnx@tilde.zoneN n1xnx@tilde.zone

          @mike @cwebber
          Of course, the OTHER thing AI doesn't do is learn from its mistakes (that humans had to clean up after).

          mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mike@thecanadian.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mike@thecanadian.social
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          @n1xnx @cwebber Actually that is somewhat debatable. The models do accept training and do by definition learn. Do they learn like humans? Probably not.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

            So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

            npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            npars01@mstdn.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            npars01@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            @cwebber

            AI isn't funded by the fossil fuel industry for its revenue or ROI (return on investment).

            AI initiatives exist to launder fossil fuel money for corrupt petrostate despots.
            https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/technology/saudi-arabia-ai-exporter.html

            AI initiatives exist to burn more fossil fuel, wastefully.
            https://www.wired.com/story/trump-energy-industry-ai-fossil-fuels-pittsburgh-summit/

            There's also the chokepoint capitalism, electricity rate surge, state surveillance, election meddling, wage suppression, price fixing, predatory pricing, rent fixing, & automated warfare.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

              I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

              So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

              a2_4am@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              a2_4am@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              a2_4am@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              @cwebber Tokens don't unionize

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                elrohir@mastodon.galE This user is from outside of this forum
                elrohir@mastodon.galE This user is from outside of this forum
                elrohir@mastodon.gal
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                @cwebber it's not rational spending, but irrational resentment. Corpos resent employees with the energy of a thousand suns. They see every work-life accommodation as a conspiracy to steal their god given right to profit margins and every paycheck as a defeat.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                  I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                  So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                  squeakypancakes@sunbeam.cityS This user is from outside of this forum
                  squeakypancakes@sunbeam.cityS This user is from outside of this forum
                  squeakypancakes@sunbeam.city
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @cwebber ai cant unionize

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                    I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                    So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                    i_give_u_worms@beige.partyI This user is from outside of this forum
                    i_give_u_worms@beige.partyI This user is from outside of this forum
                    i_give_u_worms@beige.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    @cwebber sooo they don't have to pay into #HealthInsurance and can shift that burden to you instead #CapitalStrike

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

                      I have a friend who has a budget where she spends as much individually on AI-as-a-service tokens as I make in a year. And it's acknowledged that the system misbehaves, needs to be monitored closely like a junior engineer, etc.

                      So why not hire some junior engineers if you're an org that has that equivalent cash to spend? Companies that are in such a position: you've never had a better market chance to get a sweet deal on young talent

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      tadbithuman@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @cwebber
                      They lie that they cannot find the talent

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups