Would it be better or worse for the United States if Trump was competent ?

[the5thcolumnist@mstdn.ca]

Would it be better or worse for the United States if Trump was competent ?

[kimlockhartga@beige.party]

@the5thColumnist a smart evil is twice as bad

[minego@pdx.social]

@the5thColumnist That's a tricky question. I voted worse, but that is working under the assumption that he was still in power.

I suspect that if he was competent, he wouldn't be. He is where he is because many rich people and corrupt heads of other states were able to manipulate him.

If he was competent, we likely wouldn't even know his name.

[peachfront@toot.community]

@the5thColumnist

if he was competent, he never would have risen to the presidency as a GOP

ever since Nixon appointed Ford, the guy who "played too much football without a helmet" & could barely walk, GOP picks idiotic puppets under a theory they're controllable-- Reagan & both Bushes were famous for their empty heads...

[manyroads@mstdn.social]

@the5thColumnist Let's vote on Santa instead... I like that fictional character much better.

[space_burger_steve@mstdn.ca]

@the5thColumnist I was just thinking about something similar the other day, that one of the reasons Germany lost WW2 was because little moustache jerk was terrible at strategy. Assassinating him after the war started could have been bad news for the Allies.

[nixanadoo@mastodon.social]

@the5thColumnist both