Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 685: The Ability to Be Hotterhttps://atp.fm/685

685: The Ability to Be Hotterhttps://atp.fm/685

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
26 Posts 16 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

    685: The Ability to Be Hotter
    https://atp.fm/685

    Farewell, Mac Pro.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    illustro@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    @atpfm the "mistake", from a Mac Pro perspective, Apple made was going with a monolithic architecture design as opposed to a chiplet architecture design.

    AMD has been ruining Intel in the PC chip performance at all levels of the CPU industry in part *because* they chose chiplets as their design paradigm.

    They have released in the last two years a couple of white papers that may be of interest:

    Chiplet discussion:
    https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/solutions/technologies/chiplet-architecture-white-paper.pdf

    GPUs using chiplets:
    https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/instinct-tech-docs/white-papers/amd-cdna-4-architecture-whitepaper.pdf

    dschaub@mstdn.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

      685: The Ability to Be Hotter
      https://atp.fm/685

      Farewell, Mac Pro.

      atpfmfanboi@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      atpfmfanboi@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      atpfmfanboi@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #17

      @atpfm i’m having trouble getting reliable numbers on what kinds of laptops school districts across the country are buying. My personal experience across three states, 12 districts, and a couple of hundred schools is that very few buildings are still buying Chromebook. And it is entirely because they physically breakdown, not because of device management.

      atpfmfanboi@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • atpfmfanboi@mastodon.socialA atpfmfanboi@mastodon.social

        @atpfm i’m having trouble getting reliable numbers on what kinds of laptops school districts across the country are buying. My personal experience across three states, 12 districts, and a couple of hundred schools is that very few buildings are still buying Chromebook. And it is entirely because they physically breakdown, not because of device management.

        atpfmfanboi@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        atpfmfanboi@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        atpfmfanboi@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        @atpfm so instead of a $200 Chromebook, schools are buying the $500 Lenovo Yoga4. And there is no comparison between that device and the MacBook Neo.

        Additionally, school ITs are not encouraging, per se, but they are making it easier for students to bring their own devices. Hot swapping because you left yours at home isn’t an issue: you just get a crappy Lenova for the day. But your MacBook can get into all of the school stuff relatively quickly

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I illustro@mastodon.social

          @atpfm the "mistake", from a Mac Pro perspective, Apple made was going with a monolithic architecture design as opposed to a chiplet architecture design.

          AMD has been ruining Intel in the PC chip performance at all levels of the CPU industry in part *because* they chose chiplets as their design paradigm.

          They have released in the last two years a couple of white papers that may be of interest:

          Chiplet discussion:
          https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/solutions/technologies/chiplet-architecture-white-paper.pdf

          GPUs using chiplets:
          https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/instinct-tech-docs/white-papers/amd-cdna-4-architecture-whitepaper.pdf

          dschaub@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dschaub@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          dschaub@mstdn.social
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          @illustro @atpfm

          Apple's monolithic designs made sense, and scaled up to well to the Max.

          With the M5 Pro/Max, Apple is now on heterogenous chiplets, but Apple's not scaling multiples of them (I think it is just a CPU die and a GPU die).

          We don't know how they'll scale up to Ultra (or even Quadra... my preferred term), without designing NEW chiplets.

          With the M7 and M8 we'll see if Apple gets to multiple CPU dies and multiple GPU dies to allow true efficient scaling.

          I 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • eric_neue@indieweb.socialE eric_neue@indieweb.social

            @ianRobinson @atpfm I was reading about how audio professionals are going to be in a bind, because Thunderbolt apparently has some detectable latency that PCIE sails through.

            This will never happen, but I’d love to see a Mac Studio with a PCIE receptacle on the bottom that could connect into a card enclosure with a widdle interface poking out of the top.

            dschaub@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dschaub@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
            dschaub@mstdn.social
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            @Eric_Neue @ianRobinson @atpfm

            Beyond latency concerns, this doesn't solve the Thunderbolt bandwidth problem (being 1/4 of max PCIe slot bandwidth).

            What I think Apple needs to do is:

            - Add "bonded multiple cable connections" to the Thunderbolt spec to allow 2-4 Thunderbolt cables between a Mac and a PCIe card slot chassis.

            - Then ship such a chassis for $1999 🙂

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dschaub@mstdn.socialD dschaub@mstdn.social

              @illustro @atpfm

              Apple's monolithic designs made sense, and scaled up to well to the Max.

              With the M5 Pro/Max, Apple is now on heterogenous chiplets, but Apple's not scaling multiples of them (I think it is just a CPU die and a GPU die).

              We don't know how they'll scale up to Ultra (or even Quadra... my preferred term), without designing NEW chiplets.

              With the M7 and M8 we'll see if Apple gets to multiple CPU dies and multiple GPU dies to allow true efficient scaling.

              I This user is from outside of this forum
              I This user is from outside of this forum
              illustro@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              @dschaub @atpfm oh yes, for the majority of their line, a monolithic design likely makes sense (see the first whitepaper I referenced, early on, for a discussion of the downsides of chiplets). That's why I specifically referenced relating to the Mac Pro.

              I do posit they ran into the issues with their monolithic design prior to the Mac Pro: their ultra fusion interconnector meant they got some of the disadvantages of chiplets without the yield & process benefits of true chiplets.

              dschaub@mstdn.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I illustro@mastodon.social

                @dschaub @atpfm oh yes, for the majority of their line, a monolithic design likely makes sense (see the first whitepaper I referenced, early on, for a discussion of the downsides of chiplets). That's why I specifically referenced relating to the Mac Pro.

                I do posit they ran into the issues with their monolithic design prior to the Mac Pro: their ultra fusion interconnector meant they got some of the disadvantages of chiplets without the yield & process benefits of true chiplets.

                dschaub@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dschaub@mstdn.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dschaub@mstdn.social
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                @illustro

                Anyway, I think Apple's trajectory is good, so the M6, M7, and M8 should be fine.

                I 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dschaub@mstdn.socialD dschaub@mstdn.social

                  @illustro

                  Anyway, I think Apple's trajectory is good, so the M6, M7, and M8 should be fine.

                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  illustro@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  @dschaub agreed.

                  I'll be interested to see if they go down a similar route to amd of having chiplets on "legacy" processes for tasks that wouldn't benefit from miniaturisation (like I/O), while keeping the remaining CPU and GPU functions on the bleeding edge, or if they will stick to monolithic chiplets.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                    685: The Ability to Be Hotter
                    https://atp.fm/685

                    Farewell, Mac Pro.

                    nicholasmodesto@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nicholasmodesto@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nicholasmodesto@mastodon.world
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    @atpfm

                    @siracusa@mastodon.socia,

                    Here is some external storage you may appreciate.

                    https://www.owc.com/solutions/thunderbay-flex-8

                    Link Preview Image
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                      685: The Ability to Be Hotter
                      https://atp.fm/685

                      Farewell, Mac Pro.

                      lukeratta@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lukeratta@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lukeratta@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      @atpfm
                      Marco: “They use the term ‘the big island’ because that’s more descriptive”

                      I’ve always thought that “Long Island” was also fairly descriptive.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • atpfm@mastodon.socialA atpfm@mastodon.social

                        685: The Ability to Be Hotter
                        https://atp.fm/685

                        Farewell, Mac Pro.

                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        craigb@mstdn.ca
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        @atpfm
                        @siracusa

                        I’m with you in the spirit of your post-show. However 9 Supreme Court justices over-rule in this case. Which for all visible purposes it would appear Long Island is an island. It has legally been clarified as and deemed a peninsula.

                        https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/76297/sort-bogus-reason-long-island-isnt-considered-island

                        https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/469/504/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        0
                        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups