Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
88 Posts 42 Posters 7 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • lazza@mastodon.socialL lazza@mastodon.social

    @Vivaldi will you consider making it optional rather than fully removing it? Like an opt-in feature?

    I know Vivaldi is very friendly when it comes to user choice.

    nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
    nini@oldbytes.spaceN This user is from outside of this forum
    nini@oldbytes.space
    wrote last edited by
    #38

    @lazza Can't see why they would when they're opposed to integrating any form of LLM into the browser, they are friendly but they're not about to renegotiate on their principles either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

      @lazza @kimcrawley What do you expect when you show up in someone's mentions advocating for the "AI" industry's interests?

      lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      lazza@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #39

      @dalias well, if I did that, maybe... but given that I didn't, the point is freaking moot.

      I asked Vivaldi what they plan to do about users' choice. Given that Vivaldi is one of the most customizable browser in the world, that is a very valid question.

      Anyway, it's always funny to see how anti-AI zealots get triggered. More or less the same as far-right extremists when we try to explain to them that immigrants and LGBT individuals are people, too.

      dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lazza@mastodon.socialL lazza@mastodon.social

        @dalias well, if I did that, maybe... but given that I didn't, the point is freaking moot.

        I asked Vivaldi what they plan to do about users' choice. Given that Vivaldi is one of the most customizable browser in the world, that is a very valid question.

        Anyway, it's always funny to see how anti-AI zealots get triggered. More or less the same as far-right extremists when we try to explain to them that immigrants and LGBT individuals are people, too.

        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        dalias@hachyderm.io
        wrote last edited by
        #40

        @lazza Wow, showing your true colors...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

          By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

          Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

          We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

          elearningtechie@mas.toE This user is from outside of this forum
          elearningtechie@mas.toE This user is from outside of this forum
          elearningtechie@mas.to
          wrote last edited by
          #41

          @Vivaldi Thank you.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

            @tay Regarding the second part, we DON'T WANT "something we can use on our own terms" from "AI". There is nothing useful to be had here. It's all malicious, every last bit of it. The only thing "high quality" local models would enable is massive automated spam, scam, and deception/disinformation campaigns without the perpetrators having to pay for it.

            tay@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
            tay@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
            tay@tech.lgbt
            wrote last edited by
            #42

            @dalias I mean, I feel like we're past that point, so unless you EMP every hard drive with a .GGUF file on it, we will continue to see slop articles clogging up search results. Which is deeply frustrating but, given that I've found _some_ use from LLMs (admittedly not much, and wouldn't complain too much if they did all just vanish), I would like to keep those on my own terms

            But anyway, I think I've said as much as I care to for now, I thank you for being at least willing to hear what I have to say, but in all honesty I am overdue for some rest, and wouldn't mind doing something more productive. Maybe I could update musl et al on all my systems, I'm sure my horrible patching hygiene isn't doing your good work justice.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

              @lazza @dalias @Vivaldi

              but...

              why would you ever want something like this?

              fuck the AI cruft. i can't understand opt-in/ opt-out as an argument

              lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
              lazza@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #43

              @benroyce @Vivaldi it's better when people have choice, not when some company forces you to behave like they want.

              Respectfully, it doesn't matter much whether you understand or not the fact that some people want to chose for themselves.

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kyu3a@social.vivaldi.netK kyu3a@social.vivaldi.net

                @Vivaldi I’d like to be able to hide the AI summary on Google’s search results page. This feature is very inaccurate and often gets things wrong. Plus, there’s no option to turn it off. It forces the summary onto users who don’t want it and wastes electricity.

                kaito02@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kaito02@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                kaito02@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #44

                @kyu3a unfortunately that's because you visit google.com. If you don't visit google.com this wouldn't be a problem.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                  By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                  Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                  We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                  allyngibson@social.vivaldi.netA This user is from outside of this forum
                  allyngibson@social.vivaldi.netA This user is from outside of this forum
                  allyngibson@social.vivaldi.net
                  wrote last edited by
                  #45

                  @Vivaldi I went ahead an updated the flags suggested in the news articles, anyway. An extra bit of guard never hurt!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • lazza@mastodon.socialL lazza@mastodon.social

                    @benroyce @Vivaldi it's better when people have choice, not when some company forces you to behave like they want.

                    Respectfully, it doesn't matter much whether you understand or not the fact that some people want to chose for themselves.

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #46

                    @lazza @Vivaldi

                    sure, some people choose AI

                    some people choose not to get vaccinated

                    rather the same phenomenon to me: poor choices

                    and likewise, you don't have to use Vivaldi. that's your real choice here

                    Vivaldi has ripped out the AI cruft, which most of us cheer, so go use your Chrome and enjoy yourself elsewhere

                    you dig?

                    lazza@mastodon.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                      @lazza @Vivaldi

                      sure, some people choose AI

                      some people choose not to get vaccinated

                      rather the same phenomenon to me: poor choices

                      and likewise, you don't have to use Vivaldi. that's your real choice here

                      Vivaldi has ripped out the AI cruft, which most of us cheer, so go use your Chrome and enjoy yourself elsewhere

                      you dig?

                      lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                      lazza@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #47

                      @benroyce @Vivaldi you should open the "Privacy and Security" panel in the settings... you will find some surprises. Like the fact that some Google services are enabled by default in Vivaldi, unless the user opts out.

                      And you are getting mad because one person is suggesting that LLM integration should be opt-in.

                      Priorities, I guess.

                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • lazza@mastodon.socialL lazza@mastodon.social

                        @benroyce @Vivaldi you should open the "Privacy and Security" panel in the settings... you will find some surprises. Like the fact that some Google services are enabled by default in Vivaldi, unless the user opts out.

                        And you are getting mad because one person is suggesting that LLM integration should be opt-in.

                        Priorities, I guess.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #48

                        @lazza @Vivaldi

                        "And you are getting mad because one person is suggesting that LLM integration should be opt-in"

                        yes, precisely. and i'm quite comfortable with that hard stance

                        lazza@mastodon.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                          By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                          Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                          We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                          pl@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pl@cosocial.caP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pl@cosocial.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #49

                          @Vivaldi why do you choose to fight with your foundational technology instead of rolling your own? I refuse to use anything Chromium solely so that there are other engines that may survive, why don't you?

                          cholling@bytes.programming.devC 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                            @lazza @Vivaldi

                            "And you are getting mad because one person is suggesting that LLM integration should be opt-in"

                            yes, precisely. and i'm quite comfortable with that hard stance

                            lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lazza@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                            lazza@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #50

                            @benroyce 😂

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                            • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                              By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                              Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                              We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                              kenswinson@indieweb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kenswinson@indieweb.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kenswinson@indieweb.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #51

                              @Vivaldi Thank you! This is why Vivaldi is my browser of choice. keep up the good work!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                                By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                                Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                                We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                                ericcarroll@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                                ericcarroll@cosocial.caE This user is from outside of this forum
                                ericcarroll@cosocial.ca
                                wrote last edited by
                                #52

                                @Vivaldi
                                How close is Vivaldi to Ungoogled Chromium?

                                luna@neopaquita.esL cal@kind.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • ericcarroll@cosocial.caE ericcarroll@cosocial.ca

                                  @Vivaldi
                                  How close is Vivaldi to Ungoogled Chromium?

                                  luna@neopaquita.esL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  luna@neopaquita.esL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  luna@neopaquita.es
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #53

                                  @EricCarroll @Vivaldi Ungoogled Chromium is completely FOSS, while Vivaldi has some proprietary, closed source components.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                                    By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                                    Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                                    We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                                    Y This user is from outside of this forum
                                    Y This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ybneth@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #54

                                    @Vivaldi It's true though. I swapped to Linux because of this, instantly felt difference. Hardware was never a problem, software was.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                                      By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                                      Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                                      We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                                      cynical13@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cynical13@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cynical13@social.vivaldi.net
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #55

                                      @Vivaldi

                                      I do appreciate your stance towards AI, but I'm surprised how many services you support or partner with that use generative or chat AI like Proton, DuckDuckGo, etc.

                                      Have you considered including NoAIDuckDuckGo in your search engine options? Is DDG against that?

                                      solitha@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • vivaldi@social.vivaldi.netV vivaldi@social.vivaldi.net

                                        By now you've all probably heard about the latest shenanigans from Google and their love for in-browser AI features (if you don't, this is the story: https://www.theverge.com/tech/924933/google-chrome-4gb-gemini-nano-ai-features).

                                        Our team has been inspecting the Chromium code and disabling stuff from the very first version of Vivaldi (we have some posts about this in our blog, such as https://vivaldi.com/blog/news/alert-no-google-topics-in-vivaldi/ or https://vivaldi.com/blog/no-google-vivaldi-users-will-not-get-floced/).

                                        We've also been very outspoken about our dislike of the built-in AI trend in the browser industry, but in case there's still any doubts: yes, we disable all Gemini-related features, and we've been doing it for a while.

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Guest
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #56

                                        @Vivaldi nice!

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • kimcrawley@zeroes.caK kimcrawley@zeroes.ca

                                          @dalias @lazza @Vivaldi

                                          No, no planet killing "extension," either. Gen AI should be illegal.

                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gbsills@social.vivaldi.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #57

                                          @kimcrawley @dalias @lazza @Vivaldi Heck, even the crappy spicey search they are trying to pass off as Gen AI should be illegal.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups