Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Sigh.

Sigh.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
87 Posts 54 Posters 16 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    @future_upbeat

    I absolutely agree.

    At best, what current LLMs are is evidence that linguistic processing follows statistically modelable rules.

    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR This user is from outside of this forum
    raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie
    wrote last edited by
    #22

    @cstross @future_upbeat
    Mostly but not entirely.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

      But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

      ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

      /6 (ends)

      antiqueight@mastodon.ieA This user is from outside of this forum
      antiqueight@mastodon.ieA This user is from outside of this forum
      antiqueight@mastodon.ie
      wrote last edited by
      #23

      @cstross Wait- so... I should get my brain frozen until they perfect the slicing and uploading to silicon to live eternally

      cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • raymaccarthy@mastodon.ieR raymaccarthy@mastodon.ie

        @cstross
        Also since cryogenic freezing a brain destroys the structure of an already dead brain (basically deteriotated), the folk paying for that are being scammed.

        I agree it's nice info for SF world building.

        Presumably they'd have to replace the blood of a living mouse with a special fluid to preserve the structure?

        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
        cstross@wandering.shop
        wrote last edited by
        #24

        @raymaccarthy Yes on the blood-replacement, which implies—awkwardly, for the human uploading fans—that doing this to a human would lay the experimenters open to murder charges.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cstross@wandering.shop
          wrote last edited by
          #25

          @CGM Already noted!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • antiqueight@mastodon.ieA antiqueight@mastodon.ie

            @cstross Wait- so... I should get my brain frozen until they perfect the slicing and uploading to silicon to live eternally

            cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
            cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
            cstross@wandering.shop
            wrote last edited by
            #26

            @Antiqueight Naah, the ice crystals forming in your synapses would mush them into un-digitizable soup.

            shovemedia@triangletoot.partyS antiqueight@mastodon.ieA 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              ... The next step on from Drosophila, the mouse brain, is 560 times larger—never mind a vastly more complex human brain. And to get the murine connectome we'll have to chop up *a lot* of brains: a human upload won't pass any kind of medical ethics review at this point!

              But near-term, it's expected to yield "fundamentally new architectural principles for AI systems that are more sample-efficient, more robust, and more capable of behavioral generalization than current approaches"

              /5

              uilebheist@polyglot.cityU This user is from outside of this forum
              uilebheist@polyglot.cityU This user is from outside of this forum
              uilebheist@polyglot.city
              wrote last edited by
              #27

              @cstross > fundamentally new architectural principles for AI systems that are more sample-efficient, more robust, and more capable of behavioral generalization than current approaches
              I expect Sam Altman to state that this is fake news and nobody can do things better than they do.
              I also hope it'll cause panic-selling shares in all "AI" companies - but that is unlikely, it would require the average investor to have a larger brain than a Drosophila.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                Sigh.

                So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                Link Preview Image
                FlyWire

                favicon

                (flywire.ai)

                Pop-sci explainer here:

                Link Preview Image
                Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                favicon

                RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                "The wiring is the computation".

                /1

                kithrup@wandering.shopK This user is from outside of this forum
                kithrup@wandering.shopK This user is from outside of this forum
                kithrup@wandering.shop
                wrote last edited by
                #28

                @cstross I didn't think that was actually in doubt, was it?

                mhkohne@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                  But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                  ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                  /6 (ends)

                  technicaladept@techhub.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  technicaladept@techhub.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                  technicaladept@techhub.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #29

                  @cstross Also one step closed to proving that we're likely living in a simulation.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                    ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                    /6 (ends)

                    mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mrundkvist@archaeo.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #30

                    @cstross
                    Certainly a more promising avenue towards AGI than stochastic parrots.

                    But then again, what they're doing here is copying a fly brain into a silicon black box and seeing what it does. The research has nothing to do with improving upon fly intelligence and immanentising the Fly Nerd Rapture.

                    #ai #llm

                    U 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      Sigh.

                      So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                      Link Preview Image
                      FlyWire

                      favicon

                      (flywire.ai)

                      Pop-sci explainer here:

                      Link Preview Image
                      Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                      Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                      favicon

                      RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                      Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                      "The wiring is the computation".

                      /1

                      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmcrookston@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #31

                      @cstross

                      I heard when they first got the fly simulation up and running it introduced itself as Elon Musk and said that it was going to set up a colony on Mars.

                      illuminatus@mstdn.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kithrup@wandering.shopK kithrup@wandering.shop

                        @cstross I didn't think that was actually in doubt, was it?

                        mhkohne@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mhkohne@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mhkohne@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #32

                        @kithrup @cstross I think is was widely believed, but previously unproven.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                          But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                          ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                          /6 (ends)

                          larhanya@zeroes.caL This user is from outside of this forum
                          larhanya@zeroes.caL This user is from outside of this forum
                          larhanya@zeroes.ca
                          wrote last edited by
                          #33

                          @cstross Let us know when/where the book is published. It sounds fascinating.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jmcrookston@mastodon.socialJ jmcrookston@mastodon.social

                            @cstross

                            I heard when they first got the fly simulation up and running it introduced itself as Elon Musk and said that it was going to set up a colony on Mars.

                            illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                            illuminatus@mstdn.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                            illuminatus@mstdn.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #34

                            @jmcrookston Yes, but the simulation model <did> set up the colony on Mars. @cstross

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              ... The next step on from Drosophila, the mouse brain, is 560 times larger—never mind a vastly more complex human brain. And to get the murine connectome we'll have to chop up *a lot* of brains: a human upload won't pass any kind of medical ethics review at this point!

                              But near-term, it's expected to yield "fundamentally new architectural principles for AI systems that are more sample-efficient, more robust, and more capable of behavioral generalization than current approaches"

                              /5

                              nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nilz@norden.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nilz@norden.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #35

                              @cstross

                              Lobsters... 🦞

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mrundkvist@archaeo.socialM mrundkvist@archaeo.social

                                @cstross
                                Certainly a more promising avenue towards AGI than stochastic parrots.

                                But then again, what they're doing here is copying a fly brain into a silicon black box and seeing what it does. The research has nothing to do with improving upon fly intelligence and immanentising the Fly Nerd Rapture.

                                #ai #llm

                                U This user is from outside of this forum
                                U This user is from outside of this forum
                                unkx@icosahedron.website
                                wrote last edited by
                                #36

                                @mrundkvist @cstross please do not give the flybros any ideas…

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  But I'm REALLY HAPPY right now because this kinda-sorta validates the key premise of the SF novel I just handed in last month (which involves serial reincarnation via destructive brain-slicing-and-imaging then imprinting onto an immature cortex, and then explores its disastrous societal failure modes).

                                  ... And it also hints that artificial consciousness might, eventually, be possible, if only via the hard path of doing it the same way we do it, only in simulation in silico.

                                  /6 (ends)

                                  lproven@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lproven@social.vivaldi.netL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lproven@social.vivaldi.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #37

                                  @cstross It reminds me of something I read about 30 years ago by some Linux journalist about modelling part of the digestive ganglion of a lobster.

                                  I wonder what happened to that guy? Not seem him in the Linux world in years...

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    Sigh.

                                    So it turns out we've mapped the neural connectome of Drosophila *and simulated it in silico*.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    FlyWire

                                    favicon

                                    (flywire.ai)

                                    Pop-sci explainer here:

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Whole Brain Emulation Achieved: Scientists Run a Fruit Fly Brain in Simulation | RathBiotaClan

                                    Scientists ran a real fruit fly brain in simulation using the FlyWire connectome, achieving the first working whole brain emulation.

                                    favicon

                                    RathBiotaClan (www.rathbiotaclan.com)

                                    Key quote: "The step from a complete connectome to a working computational brain model is not trivial." And there's an even more important finding in this screenshot (alt text via OCR):

                                    "The wiring is the computation".

                                    /1

                                    temptoetiam@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    temptoetiam@eldritch.cafeT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    temptoetiam@eldritch.cafe
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #38

                                    @cstross The popsci writeup stopped me in my tracks at the second paragraph
                                    "The first successful polymerase chain reaction was run in a car on a California highway." Certainly not! PCR was thought out during a car drive, a *very* different thing!
                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction#cite_ref-Mullis_97-0

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                      rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #39

                                      @cstross and while hypothetically one could potentially prolong this with intensive, continuous mental health treatment? It won't succeed, because it literally can't succeed. Unavoidably at some point you have to address the facts of the matter. Which is that they are effectively just instructions on processors, and the possibility of returning to their prior body - or any truly autonomous capability - just doesn't exist.
                                      And now you have a system with severe psychosis and homicidal urges.

                                      cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • rootwyrm@weird.autosR rootwyrm@weird.autos

                                        @cstross and while hypothetically one could potentially prolong this with intensive, continuous mental health treatment? It won't succeed, because it literally can't succeed. Unavoidably at some point you have to address the facts of the matter. Which is that they are effectively just instructions on processors, and the possibility of returning to their prior body - or any truly autonomous capability - just doesn't exist.
                                        And now you have a system with severe psychosis and homicidal urges.

                                        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cstross@wandering.shop
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #40

                                        @rootwyrm I predict that you're going to love my next novel (the one my agent's looking at right now—a few months late due to writing with cataracts).

                                        rootwyrm@weird.autosR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rootwyrm@weird.autosR This user is from outside of this forum
                                          rootwyrm@weird.autos
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #41

                                          @cstross I did, in fact. Said fly exists wholly within a simulated universe with limited sensor perception and no interaction with the 'real' world.

                                          If you want useful or workable output from any sort of machine intelligence, interaction with the 'real' world is inevitable. Doubly so higher orders which may quickly key in to manipulated 'events.' Nevermind the computational requirements.
                                          And once you cross that line, welp. Now you've got Marvin + Skynet.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups