Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A 29-year-old warehouse worker burned down a Kimberly-Clark warehouse and destroyed $500M in inventory while stating, “All you had to do was pay us enough to live.”

A 29-year-old warehouse worker burned down a Kimberly-Clark warehouse and destroyed $500M in inventory while stating, “All you had to do was pay us enough to live.”

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
31 Posts 19 Posters 17 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    barbra@social.vivaldi.net
    wrote last edited by
    #16

    @peterbrown @QasimRashid

    Don't put words in my mouth.

    I have 3 courses of active n which are legal, honourable, and don't result in their co-workers losing their jobs:

    1. Union action;
    2. Change jobs to a lower-cost area. Plenty of workers won't take a job in SillyValley because, even with a 6-figure income, they would have a lower standard of living than making half as much elsewhere;
    3. Finding someone else to share expenses with.

    So instead the asshole put all his co-workers out on the street. I'm sure they just LOVE him for that.

    But HE has no problem - he'll get free room and board and medical care, he's got his, Fuck his co-workers.

    richlv@mastodon.socialR technicaladept@techhub.socialT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • theorangetheme@en.osm.townT theorangetheme@en.osm.town

      @barbra @QasimRashid Oh sure. Who needs warehouse workers, right? And who needs independence when you can just live in a tenement with seven other people while your landlord gets rich?

      How does it feel to be part of the problem, Barbra?

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      barbra@social.vivaldi.net
      wrote last edited by
      #17

      @theorangetheme @QasimRashid

      I proposed constructive solutions. Union action wouldn't have left his co-workers and their families out on the street.

      And sharing expenses with ONE (not 7) other person is what plenty of working families do.

      Ask his now-unemployed co-workers how they feel about him. Good thing he's in jail - they'd probably beat the crap out of him because unlike him, who gets all his housing a And medical covered for the next 5-10 years, they're jobless and facing being out on the street and no medical.

      If they were precarious before, they're facing destitution now. Why not spare a thought for them instead of white-knighting this asshole?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

        @peterbrown @QasimRashid

        Don't put words in my mouth.

        I have 3 courses of active n which are legal, honourable, and don't result in their co-workers losing their jobs:

        1. Union action;
        2. Change jobs to a lower-cost area. Plenty of workers won't take a job in SillyValley because, even with a 6-figure income, they would have a lower standard of living than making half as much elsewhere;
        3. Finding someone else to share expenses with.

        So instead the asshole put all his co-workers out on the street. I'm sure they just LOVE him for that.

        But HE has no problem - he'll get free room and board and medical care, he's got his, Fuck his co-workers.

        richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        richlv@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #18

        @barbra @peterbrown @QasimRashid
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRpwVwFxyk4

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • franceskamann@freeradical.zoneF franceskamann@freeradical.zone

          @geonz @dianea @QasimRashid

          they are a legend and a hero, whether you acknowledge that or not. All she had to do was pay her workers a living wage. Billions in profit. Whose side are you on?

          geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
          geonz@mathstodon.xyzG This user is from outside of this forum
          geonz@mathstodon.xyz
          wrote last edited by
          #19

          @FranceskaMann @dianea @QasimRashid YOu're answerign my question, thanks.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
            viq@social.hackerspace.plV This user is from outside of this forum
            viq@social.hackerspace.pl
            wrote last edited by
            #20

            @Sfwmson @bweller @QasimRashid in a perfect world (or, I think still happening in some places in the world, and less than a century ago in USA) the CEO salary would be 4x that of a general worker, not 400x

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • richlv@mastodon.socialR richlv@mastodon.social

              @barbra @peterbrown @QasimRashid
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRpwVwFxyk4

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              barbra@social.vivaldi.net
              wrote last edited by
              #21

              @richlv @peterbrown @QasimRashid

              I'm well aware of Amazon's anti-union tactics. One warehouse here unionized, they closed them all down. That doesn't mean that unions aren't viable - just that stronger legislation is needed to level the playing field.

              In other words, change politicians.

              richlv@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • 401matthall@mastodon.xyz4 This user is from outside of this forum
                401matthall@mastodon.xyz4 This user is from outside of this forum
                401matthall@mastodon.xyz
                wrote last edited by
                #22

                @anarchademic

                Let's do this. I can get behind this.

                @FranceskaMann @QasimRashid

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • qasimrashid@mastodon.socialQ qasimrashid@mastodon.social

                  A 29-year-old warehouse worker burned down a Kimberly-Clark warehouse and destroyed $500M in inventory while stating, “All you had to do was pay us enough to live.”

                  So I quickly researched his claim. And the numbers don’t look good for Kimberly-Clark. https://youtube.com/shorts/uim6Egt66bM?si=rL-_kfaAYX_kkvpm

                  indigo8s@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  indigo8s@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  indigo8s@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #23

                  @QasimRashid O M G. I do understand his sentiment; HOWEVER, this is so extreme. Thanks for the cost of living stats for that area and Kimberly Clark data.

                  bweller@mstdn.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • indigo8s@mastodon.socialI indigo8s@mastodon.social

                    @QasimRashid O M G. I do understand his sentiment; HOWEVER, this is so extreme. Thanks for the cost of living stats for that area and Kimberly Clark data.

                    bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bweller@mstdn.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    bweller@mstdn.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #24

                    @indigo8s extreme is how id describe wealth inequality the rich perpetrate

                    this is just a toilet paper fire. literally shit tickets. just stuff. not working class people.

                    @QasimRashid

                    indigo8s@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • indigo8s@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      indigo8s@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      indigo8s@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #25

                      @peterbrown @QasimRashid Thank you for this gem of a chart! As a child of the 1950s, I learned from my modest income parents (children during the Great Depression) that the rich were finally paying their fair share in the 1950s and early 1960s.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bweller@mstdn.socialB bweller@mstdn.social

                        @indigo8s extreme is how id describe wealth inequality the rich perpetrate

                        this is just a toilet paper fire. literally shit tickets. just stuff. not working class people.

                        @QasimRashid

                        indigo8s@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        indigo8s@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        indigo8s@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #26

                        @bweller @QasimRashid Yes, that too!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

                          @QasimRashid

                          The economic argument in the video is bs.

                          First, two people at that stage would have a comfortable living, so if you're single, double up with someone else. Two income households is the norm nowadays.

                          Second, if you can't make a living there on your wage, either change jobs or move somewhere cheaper - you've got the whole country.

                          Third, no union? Form a union. Union is ineffective? Work to change it.

                          People pull up stakes all the time. Just burning down the place is cowardly.

                          h2onolan@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                          h2onolan@infosec.exchangeH This user is from outside of this forum
                          h2onolan@infosec.exchange
                          wrote last edited by
                          #27

                          @barbra @QasimRashid
                          Just dropping in here to say fuck off, barbra. Fix your heart, collaborator.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

                            @peterbrown @QasimRashid

                            Don't put words in my mouth.

                            I have 3 courses of active n which are legal, honourable, and don't result in their co-workers losing their jobs:

                            1. Union action;
                            2. Change jobs to a lower-cost area. Plenty of workers won't take a job in SillyValley because, even with a 6-figure income, they would have a lower standard of living than making half as much elsewhere;
                            3. Finding someone else to share expenses with.

                            So instead the asshole put all his co-workers out on the street. I'm sure they just LOVE him for that.

                            But HE has no problem - he'll get free room and board and medical care, he's got his, Fuck his co-workers.

                            technicaladept@techhub.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            technicaladept@techhub.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                            technicaladept@techhub.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #28

                            @barbra @peterbrown @QasimRashid I’m pretty sure his coworkers won’t be out on the street. Someone very clever suggested people could just form a union, live in a multi income household or get a job elsewhere.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

                              @richlv @peterbrown @QasimRashid

                              I'm well aware of Amazon's anti-union tactics. One warehouse here unionized, they closed them all down. That doesn't mean that unions aren't viable - just that stronger legislation is needed to level the playing field.

                              In other words, change politicians.

                              richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              richlv@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              richlv@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #29

                              @barbra @peterbrown @QasimRashid It looks like some people feel like they are trapped and have no agency. If you want to give them orders, you'd have to go in and do things first.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • technicaladept@techhub.socialT technicaladept@techhub.social

                                @barbra @peterbrown @QasimRashid I’m pretty sure his coworkers won’t be out on the street. Someone very clever suggested people could just form a union, live in a multi income household or get a job elsewhere.

                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                B This user is from outside of this forum
                                barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                                wrote last edited by
                                #30

                                @technicaladept @peterbrown @QasimRashid

                                His co-workers COULD have done those things, but once he burned down the place, their jobs are permanently gone. The warehouse was owned by a 3rd party, so this is an opportunity for Kimberly -Clark to get rid of the hub-and-spoke distribution model, and drop-ship to their largest customers, so those warehouse jobs are gone forever. Any future warehouses will be much smaller, and may even be "dark", only requiring a couple of rent-a-cops and one afternoon a week for scheduled inspection and maintenance.

                                But the asshole who set the fire doesn't have to worry about a job for at least 5 years. He's got his, selfish bastard.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • h2onolan@infosec.exchangeH h2onolan@infosec.exchange

                                  @barbra @QasimRashid
                                  Just dropping in here to say fuck off, barbra. Fix your heart, collaborator.

                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @h2onolan @QasimRashid

                                  How does pointing out that this asshole cost his co-workers their jobs make me a "collaborator?" And this doesn't count the other jobs lost from suppliers, big and small, in the community.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups