🚨No Joke: Conservatives in the EU Parliament (EVP) want the vote on #ChatControl 1.0 to be repeated this Thursday - even though the Parliament already voted NO!

[aho@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota ‍️ not sure who EVP are, as there is no grouping that uses that short form, you mean EPP? Or PfE? Or ECR? Or ESN?

[digol@mastodon.social]

@aho @Tutanota the EPP, the EVP is the abbreviation on german

[naturemc@mastodon.online]

@Tutanota The message comes quite late ...

edit: I read 'Tuesday' ... my mistake! So we still have time.

[atlovato@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota

[inchulk@mastodon.green]

@Tutanota Message sent, and this notice boosted.

[digol@mastodon.social]

@NatureMC @Tutanota why? The vote is this Thursday

[naturemc@mastodon.online]

@Digol Sorry, my mistake, I read Tuesday. @Tutanota

[rubenwa@social.vivaldi.net]

@Tutanota Send!

[phl@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Conservatives not knowing what "no" means is entirely on brand.

[iguana09863@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Please, these clownish politicians need to stop messing around—if they’ve already said no, it’s a resounding NO. These damn politicians and bureaucrats have a knack for pissing people off.

[tutanota@mastodon.social]

@Digol @aho Thanks, our mistake, it's corrected!

[paniash@mstdn.social]

@Tutanota I'm pretty sure there's a group of US lobbyists behind this chat control. How interesting that even after voting a stern NO, they still demand another vote. What a clown show.

[xeronarth@social.vivaldi.net]

@Tutanota Man, those AI and data collection companies really wanna keep doing this. Keep up the fight, EU. You don't want what's happening here in the States!

[em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange]

@Tutanota This is unbelievable. They literally cannot take no for an answer

[em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange]

@paniash @Tutanota Indeed, lobbyists are behind this: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-eu-ombudsman-criticises-revolving-door-between-europol-and-chat-control-tech-lobbyist-thorn/

[aral@mastodon.ar.al]

@Em0nM4stodon @Tutanota What’s this, conservatives having trouble understanding consent, you say?