At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people.
-
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
@danirabbit Rather like this Soviet cartoon about the supposed evils of cybernetics.
-
E em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
-
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
@danirabbit that becomes very obvious when people on youtube explain the use of AI Agents like Clawdbot as an employee you can command around
-
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
@danirabbit The Venn diagram of people who like to use AI, and people who would like to possess a Human Slave, is a single circle.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
-
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
@danirabbit You mean because it steals from writers, artists,.. etc? Or for some other reason?
-
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
@danirabbit
I understand where you’re coming from, especially with concerns about bias and misuse. It’s definitely something people should be thinking critically about. -
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
@danirabbit AI is just another tool like books/ internet/ search engines, by itself it is not bad, depends on the people who use it.
-
@danirabbit AI is just another tool like books/ internet/ search engines, by itself it is not bad, depends on the people who use it.
@hufflepuffWizard @danirabbit theft is bad actually
-
At the end of the day, AI is a technology for people who like the idea of owning other people. That’s what makes it inherently misogynistic, inherently racist, and inherently fascist. It is an accelerated extraction and exploitation device
@danirabbit Watching all these AI takes is like watching the opinions from the infosec community with the Snowden revelations.
Queue Benny Hill theme.
Driving a Volkswagen makes you a Nazi because ... Hitler.
-
@hufflepuffWizard @danirabbit theft is bad actually
@noodlemaz @danirabbit all technologies we have invented to share knowledge are some kind of theft. Whole internet also was built based on ideas and knowledge stolen from somewhere else. We just need to de-centralise LLMs and make them open source. No single company or country should control it like the internet, it is a very important technology for humans now.
-
@noodlemaz @danirabbit all technologies we have invented to share knowledge are some kind of theft. Whole internet also was built based on ideas and knowledge stolen from somewhere else. We just need to de-centralise LLMs and make them open source. No single company or country should control it like the internet, it is a very important technology for humans now.
@hufflepuffWizard @noodlemaz @danirabbit I disagree. While you can use information sharing tech to steal the hyperlink was set up for attribution. It's what makes Wikipedia so valuable, you make a claim and you need to provide a citation.
Scientific LLMs, ones looking through astronomical data or folding proteins, don't need to steal at all.
