Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
19 Posts 12 Posters 70 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • arstechnica@mastodon.socialA arstechnica@mastodon.social

    Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

    New Glenn was due to play a starring role in NASA's Artemis Program.
    https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/blue-origins-new-glenn-rocket-just-exploded-during-a-static-fire-test/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

    t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
    t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
    t2r@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    @arstechnica Why is nobody taking a risk on actual new technology for space? It's the same old same old 1970s rocket tech.

    bryan@dusty.ninjaB tomgwozdz@oldbytes.spaceT 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • t2r@infosec.exchangeT t2r@infosec.exchange

      @arstechnica Why is nobody taking a risk on actual new technology for space? It's the same old same old 1970s rocket tech.

      bryan@dusty.ninjaB This user is from outside of this forum
      bryan@dusty.ninjaB This user is from outside of this forum
      bryan@dusty.ninja
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @T2R
      The goal of capitalism is to make money. Old design with cost-cutting is the strategy.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • t2r@infosec.exchangeT t2r@infosec.exchange

        @arstechnica Why is nobody taking a risk on actual new technology for space? It's the same old same old 1970s rocket tech.

        tomgwozdz@oldbytes.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
        tomgwozdz@oldbytes.spaceT This user is from outside of this forum
        tomgwozdz@oldbytes.space
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        @T2R @arstechnica well, the rockets can land now. That’s pretty new technology.

        t2r@infosec.exchangeT 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
        • tomgwozdz@oldbytes.spaceT tomgwozdz@oldbytes.space

          @T2R @arstechnica well, the rockets can land now. That’s pretty new technology.

          t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
          t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
          t2r@infosec.exchange
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          @TomGwozdz @arstechnica They're still using the same old bell nozzles that are efficient at sea level, but far less in space. We made progress with the space shuttle but now we're back to capsules like Apollo and Mercury. We should be able to take off from a runway, fly up, transition and then go to space.

          iagondiscord@wetdry.worldI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tomgwozdz@oldbytes.spaceT tomgwozdz@oldbytes.space

            @T2R @arstechnica well, the rockets can land now. That’s pretty new technology.

            t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
            t2r@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            @TomGwozdz @arstechnica it’s also just thrust vectoring. Basically a giant Segway of explosive fuel.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • iamnotu@mastodon.socialI iamnotu@mastodon.social

              @arstechnica i wonder if they order parts from Amazon i mean China.

              oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
              oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
              oliver_schafeld@mastodon.online
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              AliMoonExpress usually delivers on time and in budget.

              🤓😜

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • arstechnica@mastodon.socialA arstechnica@mastodon.social

                Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

                New Glenn was due to play a starring role in NASA's Artemis Program.
                https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/blue-origins-new-glenn-rocket-just-exploded-during-a-static-fire-test/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

                oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                oliver_schafeld@mastodon.online
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                Fun prompt:

                If today's U.S. centi-billionaires were taxed at the same rates as in the 1960s, how many Apollo program budgets could be funded with that tax revenue?

                Link Preview Image
                juandesant@mathstodon.xyzJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • arstechnica@mastodon.socialA arstechnica@mastodon.social

                  Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

                  New Glenn was due to play a starring role in NASA's Artemis Program.
                  https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/blue-origins-new-glenn-rocket-just-exploded-during-a-static-fire-test/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

                  emilycdbham@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  emilycdbham@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  emilycdbham@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  @arstechnica

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • arstechnica@mastodon.socialA arstechnica@mastodon.social

                    Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

                    New Glenn was due to play a starring role in NASA's Artemis Program.
                    https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/blue-origins-new-glenn-rocket-just-exploded-during-a-static-fire-test/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

                    emilycdbham@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    emilycdbham@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                    emilycdbham@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @arstechnica

                    that was a bigger bomb then last year's box office

                    and I'll send anybody an ass pick if they get that last reference first one gets it

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grb090423@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      grb090423@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      @julieofthespirits @iamnotU @arstechnica

                      Well said.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • t2r@infosec.exchangeT t2r@infosec.exchange

                        @TomGwozdz @arstechnica They're still using the same old bell nozzles that are efficient at sea level, but far less in space. We made progress with the space shuttle but now we're back to capsules like Apollo and Mercury. We should be able to take off from a runway, fly up, transition and then go to space.

                        iagondiscord@wetdry.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iagondiscord@wetdry.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iagondiscord@wetdry.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        @T2R @TomGwozdz @arstechnica
                        This is the Kerbal Space Program mentality
                        There are actually many reasons why an HTOL SSTO is not a very good idea in real life, so many in fact that if I listed all of them I would be here all day
                        Conventional chemical rockets are too inefficient, and jet engines add a ton of complexity that you really, really would rather not have
                        Thus, I entirely understand why nobody has bothered to actually build one yet

                        t2r@infosec.exchangeT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO oliver_schafeld@mastodon.online

                          Fun prompt:

                          If today's U.S. centi-billionaires were taxed at the same rates as in the 1960s, how many Apollo program budgets could be funded with that tax revenue?

                          Link Preview Image
                          juandesant@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          juandesant@mathstodon.xyzJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          juandesant@mathstodon.xyz
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          @oliver_schafeld a centi-billionaire is 1/10000 of a hecto-billionaire, which is what these people are… I guess LLMs are not big on SI prefixes… I’m sure none of them will be allowed to do calculations that matter, right? Right?

                          oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • juandesant@mathstodon.xyzJ juandesant@mathstodon.xyz

                            @oliver_schafeld a centi-billionaire is 1/10000 of a hecto-billionaire, which is what these people are… I guess LLMs are not big on SI prefixes… I’m sure none of them will be allowed to do calculations that matter, right? Right?

                            oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oliver_schafeld@mastodon.onlineO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oliver_schafeld@mastodon.online
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            »A centibillionaire (prefix: centi- from Latin centum 'hundred' and billionaire)[1] is an individual whose net worth is at least 100 billion units of a given currency, typically USD.«

                            Link Preview Image
                            List of centibillionaires - Wikipedia

                            favicon

                            (en.wikipedia.org)

                            1: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/centi-

                            Link Preview Image
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • iagondiscord@wetdry.worldI iagondiscord@wetdry.world

                              @T2R @TomGwozdz @arstechnica
                              This is the Kerbal Space Program mentality
                              There are actually many reasons why an HTOL SSTO is not a very good idea in real life, so many in fact that if I listed all of them I would be here all day
                              Conventional chemical rockets are too inefficient, and jet engines add a ton of complexity that you really, really would rather not have
                              Thus, I entirely understand why nobody has bothered to actually build one yet

                              t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                              t2r@infosec.exchangeT This user is from outside of this forum
                              t2r@infosec.exchange
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              @iagondiscord @TomGwozdz @arstechnica We have already figured out the turbojet to ramjet transition. Now we just need to add an oxidizer to allow it to operate in space. Ya I know I'm over simplifying that last bit, but it is progress and what we should be sinking $$$ into instead of the same old same old.
                              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8a4kpgA_edU

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • iamnotu@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                iamnotu@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                                iamnotu@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                @julieofthespirits @arstechnica at least what we know about it

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • arstechnica@mastodon.socialA arstechnica@mastodon.social

                                  Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

                                  New Glenn was due to play a starring role in NASA's Artemis Program.
                                  https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/05/blue-origins-new-glenn-rocket-just-exploded-during-a-static-fire-test/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

                                  dark_mouser@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dark_mouser@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dark_mouser@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  @arstechnica Ahora va a desempeñar un papel "estallar". Me da a mi que Artemis va a tener algunos problemillas para estar en la luna. Aunque con semejante explosión puede eyectar a los astronautas en vuelo directo y sin motor.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups