Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967
Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.
In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!
It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.
@benfry Sounds like problems that plague many many modern UIs. All bling, no usability.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967
Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.
In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!
It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.
@benfry
That would have been something to see. Word ("for DOS", it went without saying) v.5 was a really capable non-WYSIWYG word processor that MS didn't match on Windows until about 2000. I almost dread to think what Word for DOS 5 was like on a Mac.
Could Macs do DOS emulation then?
(Shrug. My new employer used Manuscript mostly. Which was an education, indeed.) -
RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967
Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.
In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!
It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.
@benfry I used Word 5.1a on the Mac for ages, long past its end of life. Still probably the best word processor of the gui era.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967
Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.
In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!
It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.
-
@joXn Word for Mac 5 was good, but I liked 90s WordPerfect and Nisus Writer better.
-
@joXn Word for Mac 5 was good, but I liked 90s WordPerfect and Nisus Writer better.
-
-
-
-
@joXn @benfry @cstross @mjtsai I was going to say that I didn’t experience Word for Mac 5 but Word for Windows 2 on a 386SX was perfect. No bloat, and not enough power to do anything but get ideas down on the page (with footnotes). Then I looked up the timeline and yup both products were released in 91/92 and were pretty much equivalent.
-
-
-
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic