Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.

Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
14 Posts 13 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • benfry@information.gardenB benfry@information.garden

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967

    Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.

    In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!

    It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.

    jernej__s@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jernej__s@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jernej__s@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #2

    @benfry Sounds like problems that plague many many modern UIs. All bling, no usability.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • benfry@information.gardenB benfry@information.garden

      RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967

      Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.

      In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!

      It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.

      wellsitegeo@masto.aiW This user is from outside of this forum
      wellsitegeo@masto.aiW This user is from outside of this forum
      wellsitegeo@masto.ai
      wrote last edited by
      #3

      @benfry
      That would have been something to see. Word ("for DOS", it went without saying) v.5 was a really capable non-WYSIWYG word processor that MS didn't match on Windows until about 2000. I almost dread to think what Word for DOS 5 was like on a Mac.
      Could Macs do DOS emulation then?
      (Shrug. My new employer used Manuscript mostly. Which was an education, indeed.)

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benfry@information.gardenB benfry@information.garden

        RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967

        Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.

        In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!

        It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.

        guinnessduck@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        guinnessduck@mstdn.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
        guinnessduck@mstdn.social
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        @benfry I used Word 5.1a on the Mac for ages, long past its end of life. Still probably the best word processor of the gui era.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benfry@information.gardenB benfry@information.garden

          RE: https://mastodon.social/@mjtsai/116494957672603967

          Pretty wild to see Adobe entering the “Microsoft Word 6 for Mac” phase.

          In 1993, Microsoft had the genius idea to normalize the UI across Mac and Windows. Easier for their development! Harder on users!

          It was so bad (and slow!) that they actually went back and **re-released Word 5** while they fixed the worst of it.

          joxn@wandering.shopJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joxn@wandering.shopJ This user is from outside of this forum
          joxn@wandering.shop
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          @benfry @cstross @mjtsai Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

          mjtsai@mastodon.socialM soapdog@social.soapdog.orgS jillypaddock@mastodon.socialJ geraint@mastodon.socialG greenmtnbear@4bear.comG 6 Replies Last reply
          0
          • joxn@wandering.shopJ joxn@wandering.shop

            @benfry @cstross @mjtsai Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

            mjtsai@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mjtsai@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
            mjtsai@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            @joXn Word for Mac 5 was good, but I liked 90s WordPerfect and Nisus Writer better.

            cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mjtsai@mastodon.socialM mjtsai@mastodon.social

              @joXn Word for Mac 5 was good, but I liked 90s WordPerfect and Nisus Writer better.

              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
              cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
              cstross@wandering.shop
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              @mjtsai @joXn As Word for Mac 5 dates to 1985 or 86 it shouldn't surprise anyone that by the 90's the state of the art had moved on …

              mjtsai@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • joxn@wandering.shopJ joxn@wandering.shop

                @benfry @cstross @mjtsai Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

                soapdog@social.soapdog.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                soapdog@social.soapdog.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                soapdog@social.soapdog.org
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                @joXn @benfry @cstross @mjtsai agreed

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • joxn@wandering.shopJ joxn@wandering.shop

                  @benfry @cstross @mjtsai Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

                  jillypaddock@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jillypaddock@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jillypaddock@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  @joXn @benfry @cstross @mjtsai I'm a writer and I've never used Word.
                  Went from Locoscript to Appleworks, which became Corel somewhere along the way, to WordPerfect and Open Office. Now I use LibreOffice and that suits me fine.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    @mjtsai @joXn As Word for Mac 5 dates to 1985 or 86 it shouldn't surprise anyone that by the 90's the state of the art had moved on …

                    mjtsai@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mjtsai@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mjtsai@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #10

                    @cstross @joXn Word for Mac in 1986 was not great. Word 5 was released in the early 90s (5.1, the one people remember fondly, was in 1992), after the release of Nisus.

                    wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • joxn@wandering.shopJ joxn@wandering.shop

                      @benfry @cstross @mjtsai Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

                      geraint@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      geraint@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                      geraint@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      @joXn @benfry @cstross @mjtsai I was going to say that I didn’t experience Word for Mac 5 but Word for Windows 2 on a 386SX was perfect. No bloat, and not enough power to do anything but get ideas down on the page (with footnotes). Then I looked up the timeline and yup both products were released in 91/92 and were pretty much equivalent.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mjtsai@mastodon.socialM mjtsai@mastodon.social

                        @cstross @joXn Word for Mac in 1986 was not great. Word 5 was released in the early 90s (5.1, the one people remember fondly, was in 1992), after the release of Nisus.

                        wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wiredfool@fosstodon.orgW This user is from outside of this forum
                        wiredfool@fosstodon.org
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        @mjtsai @cstross @joXn
                        Word 4 was pretty good on a Mac SE, Word 5 started to get a bit slow.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • joxn@wandering.shopJ joxn@wandering.shop

                          @benfry @cstross @mjtsai Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

                          greenmtnbear@4bear.comG This user is from outside of this forum
                          greenmtnbear@4bear.comG This user is from outside of this forum
                          greenmtnbear@4bear.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          As one of the technical writers on Word for DOS, Word for Windows, and Word for Mac, I'm embarrassed at what it's mutated into. I no longer use it except where required. I use a Markdown editor or LibreOffice.
                          (edited for a grammar error)
                          @joXn @benfry @cstross @mjtsai

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          0
                          • joxn@wandering.shopJ joxn@wandering.shop

                            @benfry @cstross @mjtsai Unironically, word processing kind of peaked at Microsoft Word for Mac 5.

                            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oblomov@sociale.networkO This user is from outside of this forum
                            oblomov@sociale.network
                            wrote last edited by
                            #14

                            @joXn @benfry @cstross @mjtsai that's a very weird way to write WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups