Hey kids, in the olden days you bought (instead of “rented”) software and it came in a box with a disc and it was yours to use forever!
-
@rasterweb 2/ My sense is that's the general system of frequent upgrade is necessary, but too many vendors take advantage of that fact to squeeze end-users in various ways, because current regulation does not adequately discourage that.
Regulation needs beefing up, with a few unusually egregious vendors made examples for everyone. But the subscription model is otherwise a reasonable alternative to replacing software more frequently, as long as it doesn't become exploitative.
@wesdym If I look back 15 years ago I knew people who would skip a version of a large software purchase/upgrade, or they would purposely just not upgrade for as long as possible because the software did what they needed.
Often it was dealing with another user who had a newer version that forced an upgrade.
-
Well, the “forever” part was tricky because it might break due to OS upgrades or computer architecture/chip changes.
But making a one-time purchase and using software 5 or 10 years was not unheard of.
I think I paid $500 for Photoshop and it came out to under $9 per month if I do the math right… that’s for 10 years of use.
If it’s still $20 per month for a subscription and you do 10 years that’s $2,400.
I should note that I was able to pay $500 for Photoshop only because I did a huge freelance project and made enough to buy a copy. I know that's not in everyone's budget though, and that's how they get you with the $20 a month (cheap!) cost of rental.
-
@rasterweb 2/ I would liken software to being more like a personal vehicle, which you can buy, rent, or lease. Probably lease. A new car depreciates over time, no matter how well cared for. A leased car has aspects of both ownership or rental, but is replaced periodically.
But no one can build equity in software, no matter how you access it or for how long. There's no appreciation, no resale value, for anyone.
@wesdym How do you classify my model then, where I bought a 12 year old used car for cheap, paid it off in one year, and now own it forever. What is the software equivalent?
-
Well, the “forever” part was tricky because it might break due to OS upgrades or computer architecture/chip changes.
But making a one-time purchase and using software 5 or 10 years was not unheard of.
I think I paid $500 for Photoshop and it came out to under $9 per month if I do the math right… that’s for 10 years of use.
If it’s still $20 per month for a subscription and you do 10 years that’s $2,400.
@rasterweb for what it’s worth Affinity apps I bought still run on my 2015 intel PowerBook.
-
@wesdym How do you classify my model then, where I bought a 12 year old used car for cheap, paid it off in one year, and now own it forever. What is the software equivalent?
@rasterweb You will not own it forever, and this is only an analogy, not an exact analogue, and I know that you're smart enough to know that.
-
@rasterweb You will not own it forever, and this is only an analogy, not an exact analogue, and I know that you're smart enough to know that.
@wesdym If you want to be pedantic (which I am fine with):
I can own it for as long as like and/or as long as I am able.
Is that better?
So what is the software equivalency of this?
In the old days maybe it would have been getting a used computer with software already installed from the previous owner that you could still use?
-
@rasterweb for what it’s worth Affinity apps I bought still run on my 2015 intel PowerBook.
@fistfulofdave It just always seems that at some point you've got software, the OS, and hardware (chip architecture) and those three things all have to work together or the software no longer runs.
-
@wesdym If you want to be pedantic (which I am fine with):
I can own it for as long as like and/or as long as I am able.
Is that better?
So what is the software equivalency of this?
In the old days maybe it would have been getting a used computer with software already installed from the previous owner that you could still use?
@rasterweb Ironic that you should accuse me of pedantry.
Take a powder. And try not to be this tiresome and immature in the future, okay?
-
@rasterweb Ironic that you should accuse me of pedantry.
Take a powder. And try not to be this tiresome and immature in the future, okay?
@wesdym Apologies, I meant no insult. I am pedantic and hold no ill will towards others who are.
My mind is a little fuzzy from medication today so if I read things poorly please know I did not mean to do so.
-
@fistfulofdave It just always seems that at some point you've got software, the OS, and hardware (chip architecture) and those three things all have to work together or the software no longer runs.
@rasterweb I think you won’t be able to run Intel apps on Apple Silicon after the new OS this year? Not that the 2015PB is running anything close to 26. I keep getting warnings for a couple apps and extensions on my M1.
-
@rasterweb I think you won’t be able to run Intel apps on Apple Silicon after the new OS this year? Not that the 2015PB is running anything close to 26. I keep getting warnings for a couple apps and extensions on my M1.
@fistfulofdave I got a (used) M series Mac a few months ago, but still have five Intel Macs running in my house right now. I’ll see how long I can hold out with them, though I’d guess at least one will be replaced this year.
-
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
