Okay, I'll give you that: LLMs aren't the root of the problem.
-
@mgorny
3/
LLMs didn't invent corporate enshittification; they just industrialized it, providing a high-speed assembly line to automate the noise. It's exhausting to realize we aren't fighting the tools themselves, but the structural mandate that everything must constantly be exploited until it breaks.How about "communist" China?
True communist? Not quite. But China's state-capitalist model is its own beast. There, the 'infinite churn' isn't driven by VC panic or quarterly shareholder value, but by national security and strategic quotas.
Tech giants and startups aren't building LLMs just to juice a stock price; they are mandated by Beijing to achieve absolute domestic self-reliance against Western sanctions. Different master, same hyper-speed treadmill.
-
How about "communist" China?
True communist? Not quite. But China's state-capitalist model is its own beast. There, the 'infinite churn' isn't driven by VC panic or quarterly shareholder value, but by national security and strategic quotas.
Tech giants and startups aren't building LLMs just to juice a stock price; they are mandated by Beijing to achieve absolute domestic self-reliance against Western sanctions. Different master, same hyper-speed treadmill.
@mgorny
2/
The internal tech market there is brutally competitive. Because access to cutting-edge chips is rationed, they can't afford Silicon Valley's luxury of burning billions on theoretical 'god models' just to see what happens.It forces intense pragmatism. That's why we see a massive wave of highly optimized open-source projects—like Alibaba’s Qwen or DeepSeek—built for immediate, low-cost deployment. It's a hyper-frugal tech cage match.
-
@mgorny
2/
The internal tech market there is brutally competitive. Because access to cutting-edge chips is rationed, they can't afford Silicon Valley's luxury of burning billions on theoretical 'god models' just to see what happens.It forces intense pragmatism. That's why we see a massive wave of highly optimized open-source projects—like Alibaba’s Qwen or DeepSeek—built for immediate, low-cost deployment. It's a hyper-frugal tech cage match.
@mgorny
3/
The waste still exists, but it's bureaucratic. When Beijing declares AI a priority, local governments throw subsidies at it. Overnight, hundreds of identical startups bubble up to chase the cash.Developers end up frantically churning out features not to please a marketing department, but to tick boxes for state innovation quotas to keep the funding alive. Programmers are still cogs, just in a state-directed wheel.
-
@mgorny
3/
The waste still exists, but it's bureaucratic. When Beijing declares AI a priority, local governments throw subsidies at it. Overnight, hundreds of identical startups bubble up to chase the cash.Developers end up frantically churning out features not to please a marketing department, but to tick boxes for state innovation quotas to keep the funding alive. Programmers are still cogs, just in a state-directed wheel.
@mgorny
4/
As for 'enshittification,' it has a different red line. In the West, platforms rot when they squeeze users for ad metrics. In China, if an algorithm exploits workers or builds a monopoly that threatens social stability, the state steps in with a hammer.But the trade-off is total information control. An LLM there must align flawlessly with state guidelines. So instead of a VC's dream, you're coding for a government registry.
-
Okay, I'll give you that: LLMs aren't the root of the problem.
Capitalism is. The idea of infinite growth. The idea that people can't just live, they must with 40+ hours a week to justify their existence, and they must be purchasing something all the time. Companies must keep selling new stuff. All the resources must be tapped into and exploited.
And companies are making software. They must keep selling new features and pointless complete redesigns nobody wanted. The code must keep being churned over and over again. Programmers must justify their existence by churning out absurd amounts of meaningless code. The companies must exploit them.
Then, companies are entering the #OpenSource "market". They are acquiring and enshittifying. They are hiring and exploiting. And then so many volunteers just jump on the bandwagon and keep cosplaying them. And they too churn out useless code, "sell" pointless complete makeovers, "profit" off their users (even if they actually aren't making any real profit).
And then come LLMs, perfect tools for the job. Perfect tools for exploitation, for churning out useless code, for creating addiction, and for turning everyone into mindless corpospeak bullshit machines.
@mgorny There's a simple solution to this. Adopt economic inactivity. It's difficult at first, but it's an excellent solution to am issue that can easily be solved by that action alone
-
Okay, I'll give you that: LLMs aren't the root of the problem.
Capitalism is. The idea of infinite growth. The idea that people can't just live, they must with 40+ hours a week to justify their existence, and they must be purchasing something all the time. Companies must keep selling new stuff. All the resources must be tapped into and exploited.
And companies are making software. They must keep selling new features and pointless complete redesigns nobody wanted. The code must keep being churned over and over again. Programmers must justify their existence by churning out absurd amounts of meaningless code. The companies must exploit them.
Then, companies are entering the #OpenSource "market". They are acquiring and enshittifying. They are hiring and exploiting. And then so many volunteers just jump on the bandwagon and keep cosplaying them. And they too churn out useless code, "sell" pointless complete makeovers, "profit" off their users (even if they actually aren't making any real profit).
And then come LLMs, perfect tools for the job. Perfect tools for exploitation, for churning out useless code, for creating addiction, and for turning everyone into mindless corpospeak bullshit machines.
@mgorny I suspect you have critically misunderstood the point & role of capitalism. The problems we have are not native to capitalism. We find analogous forms of pointless waste in EVERY other economic system with NO exceptions.
The problem is the LACK OF OVERSIGHT & ENFORCEMENT. -
Okay, I'll give you that: LLMs aren't the root of the problem.
Capitalism is. The idea of infinite growth. The idea that people can't just live, they must with 40+ hours a week to justify their existence, and they must be purchasing something all the time. Companies must keep selling new stuff. All the resources must be tapped into and exploited.
And companies are making software. They must keep selling new features and pointless complete redesigns nobody wanted. The code must keep being churned over and over again. Programmers must justify their existence by churning out absurd amounts of meaningless code. The companies must exploit them.
Then, companies are entering the #OpenSource "market". They are acquiring and enshittifying. They are hiring and exploiting. And then so many volunteers just jump on the bandwagon and keep cosplaying them. And they too churn out useless code, "sell" pointless complete makeovers, "profit" off their users (even if they actually aren't making any real profit).
And then come LLMs, perfect tools for the job. Perfect tools for exploitation, for churning out useless code, for creating addiction, and for turning everyone into mindless corpospeak bullshit machines.
we probably should start calling infinite economical growth the name we use in medicine... cancer.
i still dont get the "reasons" by which people explain the necessity of capitalism to have good stuff... its completely irrational to say we have to buy all the shit thats advertised, have 100 shampoos in the supermarket etc if we want to have the great advances in medicine etc. and we even see capitalist greed make medical supply worse than it could be by the state of current technology
-
Okay, I'll give you that: LLMs aren't the root of the problem.
Capitalism is. The idea of infinite growth. The idea that people can't just live, they must with 40+ hours a week to justify their existence, and they must be purchasing something all the time. Companies must keep selling new stuff. All the resources must be tapped into and exploited.
And companies are making software. They must keep selling new features and pointless complete redesigns nobody wanted. The code must keep being churned over and over again. Programmers must justify their existence by churning out absurd amounts of meaningless code. The companies must exploit them.
Then, companies are entering the #OpenSource "market". They are acquiring and enshittifying. They are hiring and exploiting. And then so many volunteers just jump on the bandwagon and keep cosplaying them. And they too churn out useless code, "sell" pointless complete makeovers, "profit" off their users (even if they actually aren't making any real profit).
And then come LLMs, perfect tools for the job. Perfect tools for exploitation, for churning out useless code, for creating addiction, and for turning everyone into mindless corpospeak bullshit machines.
@mgorny LLMs have anyway relevant technological limits and defects, beyond their implementation with ethical, ecological, economical, and more consequences.
The same "open source" software has been leveraged to create and grow all of the companies that right know take hostage the world.
This shows how naive and silly are the overcomplicated OSS licenses.When you create any technology, or phylosophy, transparently for everyone, you may expect it to be adopted by anyone. You can't choose who.
-
@mgorny I suspect you have critically misunderstood the point & role of capitalism. The problems we have are not native to capitalism. We find analogous forms of pointless waste in EVERY other economic system with NO exceptions.
The problem is the LACK OF OVERSIGHT & ENFORCEMENT.@Beggarmidas, I suspect you have critically confused free market capitalism with arbitrary perfectly controlled variation of capitalism that is invented whenever someone points out that having people with money in control doesn't work out.
-
Okay, I'll give you that: LLMs aren't the root of the problem.
Capitalism is. The idea of infinite growth. The idea that people can't just live, they must with 40+ hours a week to justify their existence, and they must be purchasing something all the time. Companies must keep selling new stuff. All the resources must be tapped into and exploited.
And companies are making software. They must keep selling new features and pointless complete redesigns nobody wanted. The code must keep being churned over and over again. Programmers must justify their existence by churning out absurd amounts of meaningless code. The companies must exploit them.
Then, companies are entering the #OpenSource "market". They are acquiring and enshittifying. They are hiring and exploiting. And then so many volunteers just jump on the bandwagon and keep cosplaying them. And they too churn out useless code, "sell" pointless complete makeovers, "profit" off their users (even if they actually aren't making any real profit).
And then come LLMs, perfect tools for the job. Perfect tools for exploitation, for churning out useless code, for creating addiction, and for turning everyone into mindless corpospeak bullshit machines.
What AI is highlighting is how little the exec suiye knows about...anything. They think a lotto prediction engine can do what their employees do.
Stop fighting it. Let the whole thing fail.
Make sure you are cashed out though...
It WILL get ugly. -
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
