please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
-
@falcennial Yeah. I'm privileged in that I don't have to use them for work, but some people are forced to, I read.
@adriano @falcennial Unwillingly yes, support services are mostly chatbot first.
-
@AdamDavis woops, I replied in a tangential context but u feel me.
@falcennial
NP. In my clumsy way, I'm trying to say this poll is valuable, even though I feel guilty for not being able to select the "never" option.I have been thinking a bit about the dubious things people will do for work which they wouldn't do on their own. So, a poll that highlights that would be interesting.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Can one technically chat with an LLM?
-
@falcennial None, if you don't count the multiple times a day that I curse Gemini back into its hole for touching the power button for a picosecond too long on my android phone.
@GranVegas @falcennial you can usually (well as least I can, Samsung S25) set the side buttton long press to do something else (mine goes to the power off menu).
And I also have the Gemini App and all AI features disabled. -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial
never willing - but some websites will not put you in touch with customer service until you attempt to use their chatbot; which is never actually helpful -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial How often I chat with an LLM? Given that the way we now need to file IT or HR tickets at work is by first harrassing the obligatory "helpful chatbot" into allowing me to file a ticket, too bloody often.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial do you mean chat as in hold casual conversation, or as in interact at all? I use them, but strictly as tools, not for conversation.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Define "chat": small talk, or *any* interaction?
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
Chat as in talking with a person? Never
Chat as in "do this task" ? That's my day job now -
@falcennial What can I say, I like the company of the own nonsense my brain generates
@farah
I'm glad to be subjected to it too -
@falcennial What can I say, I like the company of the own nonsense my brain generates
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial technically when had LLMs forced on me as part of trying to get customer service etc, I've verbally abused them for a while until they pissed off, but, interpreting your question as "How frequently you willingly chat with LLM?" I picked never. ~~~~
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'm secretly a fan of AI/LLM's but no, I won't use them in their current form.
Once it's modular - I can fit it easily into a linux PC
Once it's user-trainable - And not a theft machine of the arts and commons for the richest people on earth
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial what do you mean with „chat“ ? Talking or working? I am a developer and I use it for developing and testing
-
@indigoparadox I miss old search too! duck duck go still has one.
@falcennial I mean, DuckDuckGo was my first stop until recently, but it's even worse at finding things than StartPage which I always end up at, so I just started defaulting to that. And that isn't great at finding stuff either! No boolean operators, and stuff just plain doesn't turn up!
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
Like, chat as a fake friend? Hell no.
Or one-shot "explain why this SQL code thing isnt working". Yeah, I do that.
Going through a SQL class right now, and the LLM output IS helpful, when compared to #Zybooks. Fuck Zybooks. Worse than slop.
These things are crystallized associations of knowledge copied from everything thats not bolted down.
LLM tools are useful, but they are tools. Atttributing "chat" or communication is anthropomorphizing a massive multi billion dimensional array.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial Honestly, I wouldn’t know how to. I’m sure I could if I was bothered but I’m not.
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial I'd say not at all because I don't use it for assistance, but I put a couple times a month because I do occasionally chat with it to test its limits (biases, boundaries, absurdities)
-
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial@mastodon.social
where's 'using one to answer this pole' -
please vote anonymously and boost this poll for transparency and participation:
How frequently do you chat with LLM?
@falcennial @cyb3rrunn3r unfortunately it’s „a few times per month“ just because it’s the only way to find something in our stupid intranet system if I don’t know the _exact_ term
