Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture.

Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
56 Posts 38 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

    Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

    Link Preview Image
    J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

    Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

    favicon

    Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

    ibraen@masto.aiI This user is from outside of this forum
    ibraen@masto.aiI This user is from outside of this forum
    ibraen@masto.ai
    wrote last edited by
    #8

    @inthehands TBF she's not the first author to support iffy shit.

    What annoys me is: This woman could've had it all and die an icon if she had shut her mouth, not pick fights with a marginalized community, and go all contrarian to the far right when called out for her bullshit.

    Was it better to support a covert bigot? IDK. But I do know that her actions ruined her legacy and harmed fun literature tools. It reframed her fun use of puns for names into distasteful slurs. I hope the remake flops.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

      Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

      Link Preview Image
      J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

      Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

      favicon

      Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

      epistomai@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      epistomai@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
      epistomai@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #9

      @inthehands this is so despicable. I usually don't support LGBTQ or even care, but funding something anti is totally despicable

      mikelovesbikes@hear-me.socialM canleaf@mastodon.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

        Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

        Link Preview Image
        J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

        Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

        favicon

        Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

        johnbrown@thecanadian.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        johnbrown@thecanadian.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        johnbrown@thecanadian.social
        wrote last edited by
        #10

        @inthehands disgusting bourgeoisie parasite. She got rich- up from a teachers salary to *billions* thanks to Potter- and now she's using them to further the same dark ages nonsense trans folk have been dealing with SINCE the fucking dark ages.

        All potter bullshit is banned in our home, and I have 2 children who would be big fans otherwise. We haven't given that nasty lady a dime in a decade or so, but... I did buy the original potter movies forever ago.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • epistomai@mastodon.socialE epistomai@mastodon.social

          @inthehands this is so despicable. I usually don't support LGBTQ or even care, but funding something anti is totally despicable

          mikelovesbikes@hear-me.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mikelovesbikes@hear-me.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          mikelovesbikes@hear-me.social
          wrote last edited by
          #11

          @epistomai @inthehands Sounds like you do care and support us, then! Thanks ❤️

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • arazil@elvenstar.cafeA arazil@elvenstar.cafe

            @inthehands Hot Take: Joanne hasn't produced a good story since 2000. The first few Harry Potter installments were kind of interesting but the series quickly devolved after the novelty factor wore off and some of her more problematic ideology started shining through. I have been able to sample some of the newer "Fantastic Beasts" films and... Boy are they terrible. This is one boycott that will be easy to for me to follow (especially since I stopped wanting to give her money and attention around a decade ago).

            fnord99@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
            fnord99@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
            fnord99@mastodon.online
            wrote last edited by
            #12

            @arazil @inthehands maybe u are not the demographics she plans to tap into...that stuff is for kids like 8 to 12 yo...

            itsmeholland@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

              Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

              Link Preview Image
              J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

              Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

              favicon

              Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

              f3715h@rubber.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              f3715h@rubber.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
              f3715h@rubber.social
              wrote last edited by
              #13

              @inthehands I'd not even pirate TERFling's trash!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

                Link Preview Image
                J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

                Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

                favicon

                Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

                chloeg@mastodon.artC This user is from outside of this forum
                chloeg@mastodon.artC This user is from outside of this forum
                chloeg@mastodon.art
                wrote last edited by
                #14

                @inthehands Look at the pain in that face. Those eyes tell a tale. She is suffering. I am rather pleased about that, not only is she a transphobic hate mongering pathetic human but her stories are crap too. They were always crap. Half the ideas were knockoffs. Her other stories are cringe.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                  Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

                  Link Preview Image
                  J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

                  Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

                  favicon

                  Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

                  huntingdon@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  huntingdon@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                  huntingdon@mstdn.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #15

                  @inthehands

                  The entire company of Hogwarts would be against JK Rowling's anti-trans agenda.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • epistomai@mastodon.socialE epistomai@mastodon.social

                    @inthehands this is so despicable. I usually don't support LGBTQ or even care, but funding something anti is totally despicable

                    canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    canleaf@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                    canleaf@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #16

                    @epistomai @inthehands LGBTs need support. Not bigots.

                    epistomai@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • arazil@elvenstar.cafeA arazil@elvenstar.cafe

                      @inthehands Hot Take: Joanne hasn't produced a good story since 2000. The first few Harry Potter installments were kind of interesting but the series quickly devolved after the novelty factor wore off and some of her more problematic ideology started shining through. I have been able to sample some of the newer "Fantastic Beasts" films and... Boy are they terrible. This is one boycott that will be easy to for me to follow (especially since I stopped wanting to give her money and attention around a decade ago).

                      yog_krakthulhu@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yog_krakthulhu@mastodon.socialY This user is from outside of this forum
                      yog_krakthulhu@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #17

                      That take isn’t all that hot.
                      I haven’t cared about Harry Potter since I was a kid and her books under the Psudonym Robert Galbraith weren’t very good either.

                      pynoh@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                        Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

                        Link Preview Image
                        J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

                        Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

                        favicon

                        Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

                        orientalartsrl@mastodon.unoO This user is from outside of this forum
                        orientalartsrl@mastodon.unoO This user is from outside of this forum
                        orientalartsrl@mastodon.uno
                        wrote last edited by
                        #18

                        @inthehands disgusting person

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • srfirehorseart@ohai.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          srfirehorseart@ohai.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                          srfirehorseart@ohai.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #19

                          @bigblen

                          This.

                          I don't think JKR understands the community that they helped create.

                          I enjoyed reading the books at the time, as I like the SF&F genre. I would re-read them but I am also pro and the two don't equate to me wanting to buy more from this franchise.

                          @inthehands

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                            Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

                            Link Preview Image
                            J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

                            Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

                            favicon

                            Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

                            samiamsam@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            samiamsam@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            samiamsam@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #20

                            @inthehands

                            people like her and musk and their ilk could be living the most spectacular lives, but instead they wallow in hate and apply endless time energy and money making the lives of other people miserable in different ways

                            they are dangerous and pathetic

                            despicable

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                              Keeping money from going to the Harry Potter franchise isn’t just a symbolic gesture. It’s about preventing real harm to real people.

                              Link Preview Image
                              J.K. Rowling uses Harry Potter wealth to fund anti-transgender organization

                              Harry Potter profits are going directly to anti-transgender legal cases.

                              favicon

                              Advocate.com (www.advocate.com)

                              theriac@plasmatrap.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              theriac@plasmatrap.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                              theriac@plasmatrap.com
                              wrote last edited by
                              #21

                              @inthehands@hachyderm.io
                              I know this point has been made before but Harry is her.

                              Aside from that one time he bought Ron a chocolate frog, despite having unlimited wealth and despite practically adopted and living with Ron's family, despite being written as feeling awkward when confronted by the comparative poverty, Harry does absolutely nothing to help Ron or his family. Their lot is to be poor, his is to be wealthy.

                              Link Preview Image
                              elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE p_the_wanderer@mastodon.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • yog_krakthulhu@mastodon.socialY yog_krakthulhu@mastodon.social

                                That take isn’t all that hot.
                                I haven’t cared about Harry Potter since I was a kid and her books under the Psudonym Robert Galbraith weren’t very good either.

                                pynoh@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pynoh@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pynoh@mamot.fr
                                wrote last edited by
                                #22

                                @Yog_Krakthulhu it stays a "hot take" considering millions of people continue to buy her books / films / video games / toys. It's not because you agree to a hot take that it makes it less hot 😉

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • theriac@plasmatrap.comT theriac@plasmatrap.com

                                  @inthehands@hachyderm.io
                                  I know this point has been made before but Harry is her.

                                  Aside from that one time he bought Ron a chocolate frog, despite having unlimited wealth and despite practically adopted and living with Ron's family, despite being written as feeling awkward when confronted by the comparative poverty, Harry does absolutely nothing to help Ron or his family. Their lot is to be poor, his is to be wealthy.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  elbeetoots@mastodon.nl
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #23

                                  @Theriac Sooo... Through the books, she fantasised about being a male person with money..? 🤔

                                  Quite remarkable 😅

                                  @inthehands

                                  theriac@plasmatrap.comT 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mythlfrythtyg@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mythlfrythtyg@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mythlfrythtyg@mastodon.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #24

                                    @bigblen @inthehands She sold her soul - If she ever had one - to the noseless one a long time ago.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • elbeetoots@mastodon.nlE elbeetoots@mastodon.nl

                                      @Theriac Sooo... Through the books, she fantasised about being a male person with money..? 🤔

                                      Quite remarkable 😅

                                      @inthehands

                                      theriac@plasmatrap.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      theriac@plasmatrap.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      theriac@plasmatrap.com
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #25

                                      @ElBeeToots@mastodon.nl @inthehands@hachyderm.io
                                      she chose Robert Galbraith as her nom-de-plume when she tried to prove she could be a successful adult writer.

                                      So perhaps?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cambria@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cambria@hachyderm.ioC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        cambria@hachyderm.io
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #26

                                        @jillL
                                        I don't know, I think I'd make a great billionaire. I'd buy a castle in Scotland and donate to wildcat rescues. And have a herd of house cats. And not have a social media. And leave trans people alone. Maybe even use some of that billions to give money to an org that's helpful to trans people.

                                        This is the alternative universe JKR I wish we'd gotten.
                                        @inthehands

                                        rasmus91@fosstodon.orgR 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • canleaf@mastodon.socialC canleaf@mastodon.social

                                          @epistomai @inthehands LGBTs need support. Not bigots.

                                          epistomai@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          epistomai@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          epistomai@mastodon.social
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #27

                                          @canleaf @inthehands The other way around. The world needs no bigots, for whatever reason. If there were no bigotry, no support may be needed, not only for LGBTQ. Women could study in shahira countries, no hunger in North Korea and dictatorships, no harassment and racism in usa, and the list goes on and on

                                          itsmeholland@mastodon.socialI canleaf@mastodon.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups