Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

Let's remind everyone what a safe internet actually means.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
saferinternetdasid
57 Posts 38 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • aubrey@nullgender.comA aubrey@nullgender.com

    @gonun13 @soderling Well, then the government gives me a token for something. First, they know I requested a token at this time (which is also a privacy problem, but not that big). I give that token to the site I want to use, that is okay still. But then the government asks the site owner to give them all the users with all their tokens. Now the government can match the users with real people based on the tokens they gave out.

    gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
    gonun13@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #48

    @aubrey @soderling That's not exactly the sequence. Service -> govID -> you authenticate with govID -> you share age verification with service -> they store a valid age verification token -> gov can check valid tokens not who made them (by law).
    The are other conversations involved like anonymity vs privacy. Public vs private data. But it is technically possible, it's more on how we setup our digital legal governance.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

      @Tutanota

      That second column isn't designed to make anything safer for the end user.

      panda@pandas.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      panda@pandas.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      panda@pandas.social
      wrote last edited by
      #49

      @simonzerafa

      ... while also not helping victims of abuse.

      @Tutanota

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A abody@mastodon.social

        @Tutanota Does your solution support open standards like POP/IMAP, allowing the end users to encrypt/decrypt/verify their messages EXTERNALLY? If it does not, please stop using the word "safe" and the name of your product in the same sentence.

        azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        azarilh@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #50

        @abody @Tutanota POP/IMAP is not safe tho?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • strigga_@mastodon.socialS strigga_@mastodon.social

          @Tutanota the left column does not protect minors from AI Fake content, porn and violence. This is just the wrong sharepic for the conext

          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          chris2000sp@social.anoxinon.de
          wrote last edited by
          #51

          @strigga_ @Tutanota
          That is Stigmata what you are saying. You are correct on the 3rd but nut on the first 2. The First two has to be regulated and not to be banned. And i mean it also in context of minors. Because you are make it as a Tabu and this is violence the minors indirectly. This is Double Standard if you argument that censoring everything is a good way to protect minors because that will make more victims if that Topics are stigmatized by everyone. That will get more violence not less.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gonun13@mastodon.socialG gonun13@mastodon.social

            @Tutanota Just a note. Age verification is not mutually exclusive to everything that is on the safer column. If the real world has age requirements in some operations, it's acceptable that the digital world also has the same. Making the Internet lawless is what drives attacks on other liberties.

            azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
            azarilh@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #52

            @gonun13 You block legal porn sites, people will get to illegal porn sites full of potential malware. Or simply to torrents.

            Age verification online solves absolutely nothing. Better education is the solution.

            On the other hand, blocking social media is a double edged sword. 1: It might keep children safe from toxic behaviour; but they won't learn to recognise such behaviours once they are adults. But i guess once you are an adult you don't matter anymore? Hence, education is the solution.
            1/2

            azarilh@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • azarilh@mastodon.socialA azarilh@mastodon.social

              @gonun13 You block legal porn sites, people will get to illegal porn sites full of potential malware. Or simply to torrents.

              Age verification online solves absolutely nothing. Better education is the solution.

              On the other hand, blocking social media is a double edged sword. 1: It might keep children safe from toxic behaviour; but they won't learn to recognise such behaviours once they are adults. But i guess once you are an adult you don't matter anymore? Hence, education is the solution.
              1/2

              azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              azarilh@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #53

              @gonun13 2: It might keep them ignorant on important stuff if their education is bad. Some parents are queerphobic, and children discover about queerness only in social media, which is extremely helpful. Some children only get emotional support from social media, as they CANNOT get it in person due to discrimination. This law puts at risk queer children.
              2/2

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                azarilh@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #54

                @aubrey EU is doing such software and it's open source. They are very transparent about how it works.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gonun13@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gonun13@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #55

                  @aubrey True thus we should fight governments with better solutions. But the digital world can't become a lawless place or catered just by big corps.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • rbuzz@mastodon.socialR rbuzz@mastodon.social

                    @Tutanota why age verification is not safe? Internet should be 35+ only. Because it destroys brain tissues with cat pictures.

                    memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                    memdmp@catgirl.centerM This user is from outside of this forum
                    memdmp@catgirl.center
                    wrote last edited by
                    #56

                    @rbuzz@mastodon.social @Tutanota@mastodon.social internet should be 80+ only to make it safe for seniors, of course. adults have the chance to make seniors uncomfortable and as such the internet should only consist of seniors.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tcmuffin@toot.walesT tcmuffin@toot.wales

                      @Tutanota

                      I've been using KeePassXC for years and my default password length is 32 characters comprising A-Z, a-z, 0-9, and special characters...

                      Link Preview Image
                      azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      azarilh@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      azarilh@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #57

                      @TCMuffin @Tutanota My password generator is my hands smashing the keyboard.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups