Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Interview done!

Interview done!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
20 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

    This figure shows that SpaceX's million data center stupid idea would result in dozens of satellite streaks per exposure (from the FORS2 instrument at Paranal) over half the sky, even an hour after nautical twilight. The part of the sky where you could still do astronomy research would be extremely limited.

    mikeh@ice.sophari.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mikeh@ice.sophari.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
    mikeh@ice.sophari.org
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @sundogplanets Talking of satellite streaks, how fast, in degrees per minute (or other suitable timeframe) do satellites in starlink level orbits appear to cross the sky?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

      "A mega-constellation of one million or more satellites would fundamentally alter observing conditions, ensuring that most exposures contain multiple trails during a large fraction of the night. The field-of-view losses then rise to 10%–20%, making satellites the dominant source of data loss, ahead of weather and technical downtime."

      But don't worry, we'll be in full Kessler Syndrome long before we get to one million satellites! 😭

      schamschula@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      schamschula@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
      schamschula@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @sundogplanets I wonder how much fuel is budgeted to do the "LEO weave"?
      Never mind, what are the odds that there isn't a failure of controlability (uplink comms, onboard processing, thrusters, etc): Tl;dr vanishingly small

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

        Interview done! Now time to dig in to this really thorough, horrifying paper by Olivier Hainaut about what the night sky will look like with future satellites https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.09427

        This is similar to the kind of modelling that I've done with my collaborators, but using totally different code and methods. This is how science works! Predictions are being tested, and unfortunately for the sky, this paper's predictions line up with ours. It's bad.

        evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
        evoscale@c.imE This user is from outside of this forum
        evoscale@c.im
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @sundogplanets If there were the option of these satellites interconnecting, to form a global solar panel, some of us would actually go "hmmm"...

        But, not.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

          They also model Reflect Orbital's stupid idea, showing that with giant mirrors in orbit, the entire night sky worldwide would become as bright as in a typical suburb, even if you're outside their beams.

          jerzone@techhub.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jerzone@techhub.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
          jerzone@techhub.social
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @sundogplanets I just had a horrible thought that the businesses who'd be using the "sun any time" service would be car lots. They already try any trick to garner attention, so having their cars lit up like daytime into the dark night might be too much to resist.

          sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

            "A mega-constellation of one million or more satellites would fundamentally alter observing conditions, ensuring that most exposures contain multiple trails during a large fraction of the night. The field-of-view losses then rise to 10%–20%, making satellites the dominant source of data loss, ahead of weather and technical downtime."

            But don't worry, we'll be in full Kessler Syndrome long before we get to one million satellites! 😭

            szakib@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
            szakib@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
            szakib@freeradical.zone
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @sundogplanets Has anyone modelled the Kessle syndrome sky? I wonder what it would look like.

            sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
              sundogplanets@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @redshiftdrift I am extremely aware of that. Just can't fit all the many problems into one thread.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jerzone@techhub.socialJ jerzone@techhub.social

                @sundogplanets I just had a horrible thought that the businesses who'd be using the "sun any time" service would be car lots. They already try any trick to garner attention, so having their cars lit up like daytime into the dark night might be too much to resist.

                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @jerzone Well, "fortunately" the spotlight size is like 5km. So it wouldn't really "benefit" the car lot only. (Lots of quotes because this is all awful)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • szakib@freeradical.zoneS szakib@freeradical.zone

                  @sundogplanets Has anyone modelled the Kessle syndrome sky? I wonder what it would look like.

                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  sundogplanets@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @szakib I've thought about doing that simulation, and decided it was too depressing

                  szakib@freeradical.zoneS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                    @szakib I've thought about doing that simulation, and decided it was too depressing

                    szakib@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                    szakib@freeradical.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                    szakib@freeradical.zone
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @sundogplanets yeah...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • sundogplanets@mastodon.socialS sundogplanets@mastodon.social

                      Interview done! Now time to dig in to this really thorough, horrifying paper by Olivier Hainaut about what the night sky will look like with future satellites https://arxiv.org/pdf/2604.09427

                      This is similar to the kind of modelling that I've done with my collaborators, but using totally different code and methods. This is how science works! Predictions are being tested, and unfortunately for the sky, this paper's predictions line up with ours. It's bad.

                      manul70@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      manul70@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      manul70@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @sundogplanets It's horrible, is the exosphere and thermosphere a lawless place?
                      Follows Starlink `constellation`:

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups