Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. A salient point within by @pluralistic "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized.

A salient point within by @pluralistic "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
19 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    inkyschwartz@mastodon.social
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    RE: https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/116414078285695998

    A salient point within by @pluralistic
    "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized. How much more do we need to spend before we're certain that god isn't lurking in the word-guessing program? Sam Altman says it'll take another $2-3t – call it six months' worth of all US federal spending. If we do that and we still haven't met god, are we done? Can we call it a day?"

    bms48@mastodon.socialB paninid@mastodon.worldP wesdym@mastodon.socialW cassandracorvid@mstdn.socialC pomcountyirregs@mstdn.socialP 5 Replies Last reply
    0
    • inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI inkyschwartz@mastodon.social

      RE: https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/116414078285695998

      A salient point within by @pluralistic
      "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized. How much more do we need to spend before we're certain that god isn't lurking in the word-guessing program? Sam Altman says it'll take another $2-3t – call it six months' worth of all US federal spending. If we do that and we still haven't met god, are we done? Can we call it a day?"

      bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      bms48@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @InkySchwartz @pluralistic As if having to live through the collapse of Western late-stage capitalism screwing itself in the heinie wasn't bad enough, without it trying to take what is left of liberal democracy down with it...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI inkyschwartz@mastodon.social

        RE: https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/116414078285695998

        A salient point within by @pluralistic
        "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized. How much more do we need to spend before we're certain that god isn't lurking in the word-guessing program? Sam Altman says it'll take another $2-3t – call it six months' worth of all US federal spending. If we do that and we still haven't met god, are we done? Can we call it a day?"

        paninid@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
        paninid@mastodon.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
        paninid@mastodon.world
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @InkySchwartz

        I personally love that @pluralistic is making oblique references to #ImmanentizeTheEschaton.

        LFG

        bms48@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
          marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
          marjolica@social.linux.pizza
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic surely not. In 1953 Arthur C Clarke wrote that they could be printed out in 100 days, with a rented computer of the time.

          Link Preview Image
          The Nine Billion Names of God - Wikipedia

          favicon

          (en.wikipedia.org)

          proteusbcn@masto.esP brainwise@mas.toB cptbutton@dice.campC 3 Replies Last reply
          0
          • paninid@mastodon.worldP paninid@mastodon.world

            @InkySchwartz

            I personally love that @pluralistic is making oblique references to #ImmanentizeTheEschaton.

            LFG

            bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bms48@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
            bms48@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @paninid @InkySchwartz @pluralistic My references to "Illuminatus!" are anything but oblique, they are very direct. Cognition itself is potentially under attack, if not already.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM marjolica@social.linux.pizza

              @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic surely not. In 1953 Arthur C Clarke wrote that they could be printed out in 100 days, with a rented computer of the time.

              Link Preview Image
              The Nine Billion Names of God - Wikipedia

              favicon

              (en.wikipedia.org)

              proteusbcn@masto.esP This user is from outside of this forum
              proteusbcn@masto.esP This user is from outside of this forum
              proteusbcn@masto.es
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @marjolica @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic Perhaps the most unsettling thought is that when we finally reach that multi-trillion dollar 'discovery', we’ll encounter the same ending as in the book. Arthur C. Clarke was a giant; 70 years later and he’s still the most relevant compass for our technological obsession.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI inkyschwartz@mastodon.social

                RE: https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/116414078285695998

                A salient point within by @pluralistic
                "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized. How much more do we need to spend before we're certain that god isn't lurking in the word-guessing program? Sam Altman says it'll take another $2-3t – call it six months' worth of all US federal spending. If we do that and we still haven't met god, are we done? Can we call it a day?"

                wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wesdym@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @InkySchwartz Those who've seen THX1138 might recall that the relentless pursuit of the protagonist only ends when his pursuers decide that it's too costly and no longer justified.

                However oppressive that society was, they understood cost/benefit down to the penny. Ours? Not so such, it seems.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • angusm@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  angusm@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                  angusm@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic I say we get right on it. What's the worst that could happen?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM marjolica@social.linux.pizza

                    @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic surely not. In 1953 Arthur C Clarke wrote that they could be printed out in 100 days, with a rented computer of the time.

                    Link Preview Image
                    The Nine Billion Names of God - Wikipedia

                    favicon

                    (en.wikipedia.org)

                    brainwise@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brainwise@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
                    brainwise@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @marjolica Robert Powell's reading for BBC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWvUKSIjBYk

                    / @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic

                    marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • brainwise@mas.toB brainwise@mas.to

                      @marjolica Robert Powell's reading for BBC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWvUKSIjBYk

                      / @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic

                      marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                      marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                      marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      @brainwise @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic I think I remember hearing a reading of the story by Arthur C Clarke himself, but it was some time ago and I can't now find either a reference or link, so maybe it wasn't him, maybe it was the BBC reading you mention.

                      brainwise@mas.toB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI inkyschwartz@mastodon.social

                        RE: https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/116414078285695998

                        A salient point within by @pluralistic
                        "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized. How much more do we need to spend before we're certain that god isn't lurking in the word-guessing program? Sam Altman says it'll take another $2-3t – call it six months' worth of all US federal spending. If we do that and we still haven't met god, are we done? Can we call it a day?"

                        cassandracorvid@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cassandracorvid@mstdn.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cassandracorvid@mstdn.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        @InkySchwartz

                        Robert Anton Wilson FTW!

                        @pluralistic

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • inkyschwartz@mastodon.socialI inkyschwartz@mastodon.social

                          RE: https://mamot.fr/@pluralistic/116414078285695998

                          A salient point within by @pluralistic
                          "As of this moment, the human race has lit more than $1.4t on fire to immanentize this eschaton, and it remains stubbornly disimmanentized. How much more do we need to spend before we're certain that god isn't lurking in the word-guessing program? Sam Altman says it'll take another $2-3t – call it six months' worth of all US federal spending. If we do that and we still haven't met god, are we done? Can we call it a day?"

                          pomcountyirregs@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pomcountyirregs@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pomcountyirregs@mstdn.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          @InkySchwartz @pluralistic @lisamelton It hasn’t been lit on fire, exactly. One entity’s expense is another’s income.

                          Now, for those who claim to believe in marketplace efficiency may, in a Professor Pangloss way, argue that this had to happen and is a good thing.

                          I have skepticism regarding the complete efficiency and what kids once called the wisdom of crowds. But I do believe the more extended, the more painful the correction for a solution looking for a mass scale problem.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM marjolica@social.linux.pizza

                            @brainwise @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic I think I remember hearing a reading of the story by Arthur C Clarke himself, but it was some time ago and I can't now find either a reference or link, so maybe it wasn't him, maybe it was the BBC reading you mention.

                            brainwise@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brainwise@mas.toB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brainwise@mas.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            @marjolica There was also a fully dramatized reading, but I cannot find a recording of that posted online. / @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • kirch@tilde.zoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kirch@tilde.zoneK This user is from outside of this forum
                              kirch@tilde.zone
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              @arfisk @marjolica @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic I actually did this a few years back, using a 23-character alphabet like in the story produced 9gb of text... And the world's still here

                              marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM marjolica@social.linux.pizza

                                @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic surely not. In 1953 Arthur C Clarke wrote that they could be printed out in 100 days, with a rented computer of the time.

                                Link Preview Image
                                The Nine Billion Names of God - Wikipedia

                                favicon

                                (en.wikipedia.org)

                                cptbutton@dice.campC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cptbutton@dice.campC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cptbutton@dice.camp
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                @marjolica @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic

                                A while back I did some calculations based on line printers from back then. Don't have it to hand, but I think it came 10 of the best line-printers then, with some allowance for maintenance.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mannydexter@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mannydexter@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mannydexter@beige.party
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @arfisk @marjolica @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic

                                  Fellow workers,

                                  This is The Way.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • wcbdata@vis.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wcbdata@vis.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                    wcbdata@vis.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    @arfisk @marjolica @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic And I glanced up and saw the eyes of billionaires blinking out one by one leaving only the rapturous joy of literally everyone else.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    0
                                    • damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      damonwakes@mastodon.sdf.org
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic I can do it way cheaper: https://damonwakes.itch.io/the-ten-million-invocations-of-esnesnon-22022022

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kirch@tilde.zoneK kirch@tilde.zone

                                        @arfisk @marjolica @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic I actually did this a few years back, using a 23-character alphabet like in the story produced 9gb of text... And the world's still here

                                        marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        @kirch @arfisk @rellek_m @InkySchwartz @pluralistic are you sure? Seems a bit like a bad dream at the moment. But of course the tech bros are very busy replacing the stars with satellites so it's hard to tell if the stars have really gone or not.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                        Reply
                                        • Reply as topic
                                        Log in to reply
                                        • Oldest to Newest
                                        • Newest to Oldest
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Login

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Categories
                                        • Recent
                                        • Tags
                                        • Popular
                                        • World
                                        • Users
                                        • Groups