Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Open source has an open slop problem.

Open source has an open slop problem.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
20 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

    Open source has an open slop problem.

    And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

    Link Preview Image
    The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

    Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

    favicon

    Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

    steelman@mstdn.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
    steelman@mstdn.ioS This user is from outside of this forum
    steelman@mstdn.io
    wrote last edited by
    #6

    oi! @forgejo a feature request: circles.

    @Daojoan
    @Codeberg

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
    • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

      Open source has an open slop problem.

      And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

      Link Preview Image
      The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

      Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

      favicon

      Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

      decibyte@social.data.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
      decibyte@social.data.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
      decibyte@social.data.coop
      wrote last edited by
      #7

      @Daojoan not a bad idea. But:

      > You could imagine this layered onto GitHub

      Except GitHub is owned by Microsoft who bet all their money and their entire business on the slop economy. So you'd never* get them to do something like that, that reduces the incentives to mass slopping.

      *) "Never", until they jump on the next hype train going in a new exhausting direction.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

        Open source has an open slop problem.

        And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

        Link Preview Image
        The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

        Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

        favicon

        Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

        sergiudinit@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sergiudinit@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
        sergiudinit@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #8

        This is something that has been bugging me for months. The noise to signal ratio in open source repos has gotten insane. You used to be able to trust that if something had stars and contributors it was legit. Now half of it is AI slop with a polished README and zero real usage. We need better curation, not more code

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

          Open source has an open slop problem.

          And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

          Link Preview Image
          The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

          Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

          favicon

          Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

          thierry_van_kerm@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          thierry_van_kerm@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          thierry_van_kerm@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #9

          @Daojoan Interesting

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

            Open source has an open slop problem.

            And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

            Link Preview Image
            The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

            Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

            favicon

            Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

            da5nsy@social.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
            da5nsy@social.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
            da5nsy@social.coop
            wrote last edited by
            #10

            @Daojoan
            #Couchsurfing used to have a vouch system which worked a bit like this (once you'd been vouched for x times you could vouch for other people)

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

              Open source has an open slop problem.

              And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

              Link Preview Image
              The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

              Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

              favicon

              Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

              durandal@oldbytes.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
              durandal@oldbytes.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
              durandal@oldbytes.space
              wrote last edited by
              #11

              @Daojoan this vouch system has been doing the rounds…

              Link Preview Image
              GitHub - mitchellh/vouch: A community trust management system based on explicit vouches to participate.

              A community trust management system based on explicit vouches to participate. - mitchellh/vouch

              favicon

              GitHub (github.com)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                Open source has an open slop problem.

                And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

                Link Preview Image
                The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

                Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

                favicon

                Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

                dbat@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
                dbat@mastodon.gamedev.placeD This user is from outside of this forum
                dbat@mastodon.gamedev.place
                wrote last edited by
                #12

                @Daojoan fabulous article. Thanks.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                  Open source has an open slop problem.

                  And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

                  Link Preview Image
                  The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

                  Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

                  favicon

                  Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

                  chrastecky@phpc.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chrastecky@phpc.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                  chrastecky@phpc.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #13

                  @Daojoan Didn't really read it whole, simping for monopolies is not my cup of tea.

                  The Romans also had many things figured out - turns out slavery is great when you want to cut costs!

                  That's pretty much how the intro reads to me.

                  renardboy@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                    Open source has an open slop problem.

                    And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

                    Link Preview Image
                    The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

                    Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

                    favicon

                    Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

                    lcstyle@mas.toL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lcstyle@mas.toL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lcstyle@mas.to
                    wrote last edited by
                    #14

                    @Daojoan it's hard for people to reject authoritarianism and accept freedom. I get it.

                    The Wake-Up Call That Looks Like an Attack - Loose Cannon

                    In a World That Runs on Emptiness.

                    favicon

                    (www.ctrlaltrevolt.net)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                      Open source has an open slop problem.

                      And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

                      Link Preview Image
                      The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

                      Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

                      favicon

                      Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

                      elon12@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      elon12@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                      elon12@mastodon.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #15

                      @Daojoan Hello friend Greetings 🌺
                      ‎How are you doing today hope you’re feeling well and your family? You are having a direct text from Elon.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                        Open source has an open slop problem.

                        And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

                        Link Preview Image
                        The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

                        Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

                        favicon

                        Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

                        nucholab@genomic.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nucholab@genomic.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nucholab@genomic.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #16

                        @Daojoan But Florentine weavers would also resort to burning down the workshops of outsider weavers… do we want people in the web of trust to burn down AI data cent…. never mind, proceed!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                          Open source has an open slop problem.

                          And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

                          Link Preview Image
                          The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

                          Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

                          favicon

                          Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

                          renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                          renardboy@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #17

                          @Daojoan Love this, thinking about a practical implementation.

                          We could have software that generates cryptographic certificates, which anyone who already has one can issue. The new certificate would contain the issuer's certificate, which by this rule would itself contain its own issuer's certificate, and so on.

                          Pull requests, social media posts, whatever, could have certificates attached, and be visible to clients who would reject anything without a trusted cert somewhere in the chain.

                          renardboy@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • chrastecky@phpc.socialC chrastecky@phpc.social

                            @Daojoan Didn't really read it whole, simping for monopolies is not my cup of tea.

                            The Romans also had many things figured out - turns out slavery is great when you want to cut costs!

                            That's pretty much how the intro reads to me.

                            renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            renardboy@mastodon.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #18

                            @chrastecky @Daojoan Brother you gotta learn to spot a provocative title, and also not be commenting when you didn't read the article.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • renardboy@mastodon.socialR renardboy@mastodon.social

                              @Daojoan Love this, thinking about a practical implementation.

                              We could have software that generates cryptographic certificates, which anyone who already has one can issue. The new certificate would contain the issuer's certificate, which by this rule would itself contain its own issuer's certificate, and so on.

                              Pull requests, social media posts, whatever, could have certificates attached, and be visible to clients who would reject anything without a trusted cert somewhere in the chain.

                              renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              renardboy@mastodon.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #19

                              @Daojoan and there could be a repository to report bad activity that would notify everyone in the bad actor's cert chain so they can take action, some kind of mechanism to revoke a cert etc.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • daojoan@mastodon.socialD daojoan@mastodon.social

                                Open source has an open slop problem.

                                And I think the solution is one that would've been perfectly obvious to a thirteenth-century Florentine weaver...

                                Link Preview Image
                                The case for gatekeeping, or: why medieval guilds had it figured out

                                Every open source maintainer I've talked to in the last six months has the same complaint: the absolute flood of mass-produced, AI-generated, mass-submitted slop requests have turned their repositories into a slush pile. The contributions look like contributions, they have commit messages, they reference issues and they follow templates etc.

                                favicon

                                Westenberg. (www.joanwestenberg.com)

                                paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paco@infosec.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                paco@infosec.exchange
                                wrote last edited by
                                #20

                                @Daojoan When you say ‘The "open" in open source was always about access to code, not the abolition of all quality filters on human participation.’ You highlight humans making the same stupid error LLMs do. They take a word like “open” that has a variety of meanings based on context, remove all context, assign a meaning, and try to stick it back into a context it doesn’t fit.

                                Like an LLM discussing “diving” can easily careen between skydiving, scuba diving, and swimming diving. Snorkel? Parachute? Swimming cap?

                                To me, it feels like a variation on context collapse. Using the wrong sense of a word (“open”) because it has been stripped of its context (the open source tradition).

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups