Well I don't know.
-
Well I don't know. Honestly. What is the world coming to?
Am I correct that it is Papa Johns, and not Papa John's. If so, that offends the grammarian in me
Gemini said
It might be time to take a deep, grounding breath. You are correct about their current branding, and your grammatical instincts are spot on.In November 2021, the company officially rebranded its consumer-facing identity from Papa John’s to Papa Johns, deliberately removing the possessive apostrophe.
Here is the breakdown of why this happened and how it affects your grammarian sensibilities.
Why They Dropped the Apostrophe
The decision was a strategic move made during a period of significant company upheaval. The primary reasons cited by the company and branding experts were:Distancing from the Founder: The chain was named after its founder, John Schnatter ("Papa John"). Following public controversies involving Schnatter and his subsequent departure from the company, removing the apostrophe was a symbolic way to signal that the brand no longer belonged to him. It shifted the focus from the man to the collective brand.
Modernization and Simplicity: The company stated the new logo was designed to be "bold, simple, fun and clean," making it easier to read on digital platforms, app icons, and smaller screens. This is a common trend in corporate rebranding.
Inclusivity: Some interpretations suggest that "Papa Johns" implies a collective—the many people named John, or more likely, the collective of "Papas" (fathers/grandfathers) that the brand wants to evoke—rather than one specific person’s domain.
For Your Grammarian Soul
You are entirely correct that this defies standard English conventions.If the restaurant is owned by Papa John, it should be Papa John's (singular possessive).
If the restaurant is owned by multiple Papas, and those Papas are all named John, it should theoretically be Papa Johns' (plural possessive).
Papa Johns has no possessive marker at all. It treats the name as a compound, pluralized noun functioning purely as a trademark.
The Silver Lining (Sort Of)
While their logos, pizza boxes, and websites all scream Papa Johns, the official corporate entity remains Papa John’s International, Inc. The company kept the apostrophe in its formal legal name even while abandoning it in its advertising.You can take some comfort in knowing that on a strictly legal document, the rules of grammar still hold some sway. But on the storefront, the grammarian in you will have to look away.
-
Well I don't know. Honestly. What is the world coming to?
Am I correct that it is Papa Johns, and not Papa John's. If so, that offends the grammarian in me
Gemini said
It might be time to take a deep, grounding breath. You are correct about their current branding, and your grammatical instincts are spot on.In November 2021, the company officially rebranded its consumer-facing identity from Papa John’s to Papa Johns, deliberately removing the possessive apostrophe.
Here is the breakdown of why this happened and how it affects your grammarian sensibilities.
Why They Dropped the Apostrophe
The decision was a strategic move made during a period of significant company upheaval. The primary reasons cited by the company and branding experts were:Distancing from the Founder: The chain was named after its founder, John Schnatter ("Papa John"). Following public controversies involving Schnatter and his subsequent departure from the company, removing the apostrophe was a symbolic way to signal that the brand no longer belonged to him. It shifted the focus from the man to the collective brand.
Modernization and Simplicity: The company stated the new logo was designed to be "bold, simple, fun and clean," making it easier to read on digital platforms, app icons, and smaller screens. This is a common trend in corporate rebranding.
Inclusivity: Some interpretations suggest that "Papa Johns" implies a collective—the many people named John, or more likely, the collective of "Papas" (fathers/grandfathers) that the brand wants to evoke—rather than one specific person’s domain.
For Your Grammarian Soul
You are entirely correct that this defies standard English conventions.If the restaurant is owned by Papa John, it should be Papa John's (singular possessive).
If the restaurant is owned by multiple Papas, and those Papas are all named John, it should theoretically be Papa Johns' (plural possessive).
Papa Johns has no possessive marker at all. It treats the name as a compound, pluralized noun functioning purely as a trademark.
The Silver Lining (Sort Of)
While their logos, pizza boxes, and websites all scream Papa Johns, the official corporate entity remains Papa John’s International, Inc. The company kept the apostrophe in its formal legal name even while abandoning it in its advertising.You can take some comfort in knowing that on a strictly legal document, the rules of grammar still hold some sway. But on the storefront, the grammarian in you will have to look away.
@JonathanMosen What if it turns out that the rebranded Papa Johns was named in recognition of the founder of Johns Hopkins university?
-
Well I don't know. Honestly. What is the world coming to?
Am I correct that it is Papa Johns, and not Papa John's. If so, that offends the grammarian in me
Gemini said
It might be time to take a deep, grounding breath. You are correct about their current branding, and your grammatical instincts are spot on.In November 2021, the company officially rebranded its consumer-facing identity from Papa John’s to Papa Johns, deliberately removing the possessive apostrophe.
Here is the breakdown of why this happened and how it affects your grammarian sensibilities.
Why They Dropped the Apostrophe
The decision was a strategic move made during a period of significant company upheaval. The primary reasons cited by the company and branding experts were:Distancing from the Founder: The chain was named after its founder, John Schnatter ("Papa John"). Following public controversies involving Schnatter and his subsequent departure from the company, removing the apostrophe was a symbolic way to signal that the brand no longer belonged to him. It shifted the focus from the man to the collective brand.
Modernization and Simplicity: The company stated the new logo was designed to be "bold, simple, fun and clean," making it easier to read on digital platforms, app icons, and smaller screens. This is a common trend in corporate rebranding.
Inclusivity: Some interpretations suggest that "Papa Johns" implies a collective—the many people named John, or more likely, the collective of "Papas" (fathers/grandfathers) that the brand wants to evoke—rather than one specific person’s domain.
For Your Grammarian Soul
You are entirely correct that this defies standard English conventions.If the restaurant is owned by Papa John, it should be Papa John's (singular possessive).
If the restaurant is owned by multiple Papas, and those Papas are all named John, it should theoretically be Papa Johns' (plural possessive).
Papa Johns has no possessive marker at all. It treats the name as a compound, pluralized noun functioning purely as a trademark.
The Silver Lining (Sort Of)
While their logos, pizza boxes, and websites all scream Papa Johns, the official corporate entity remains Papa John’s International, Inc. The company kept the apostrophe in its formal legal name even while abandoning it in its advertising.You can take some comfort in knowing that on a strictly legal document, the rules of grammar still hold some sway. But on the storefront, the grammarian in you will have to look away.
@JonathanMosen It took me a while to realise that the name of the university was *Johns* Hopkins and it is named, presumably, after two people, or at least one person with a double barrelled name. It’s not a possessive - I never thought it was, but I assumed that there was or had been a Mr John Hopkins and I kept mishearing the name.
-
Well I don't know. Honestly. What is the world coming to?
Am I correct that it is Papa Johns, and not Papa John's. If so, that offends the grammarian in me
Gemini said
It might be time to take a deep, grounding breath. You are correct about their current branding, and your grammatical instincts are spot on.In November 2021, the company officially rebranded its consumer-facing identity from Papa John’s to Papa Johns, deliberately removing the possessive apostrophe.
Here is the breakdown of why this happened and how it affects your grammarian sensibilities.
Why They Dropped the Apostrophe
The decision was a strategic move made during a period of significant company upheaval. The primary reasons cited by the company and branding experts were:Distancing from the Founder: The chain was named after its founder, John Schnatter ("Papa John"). Following public controversies involving Schnatter and his subsequent departure from the company, removing the apostrophe was a symbolic way to signal that the brand no longer belonged to him. It shifted the focus from the man to the collective brand.
Modernization and Simplicity: The company stated the new logo was designed to be "bold, simple, fun and clean," making it easier to read on digital platforms, app icons, and smaller screens. This is a common trend in corporate rebranding.
Inclusivity: Some interpretations suggest that "Papa Johns" implies a collective—the many people named John, or more likely, the collective of "Papas" (fathers/grandfathers) that the brand wants to evoke—rather than one specific person’s domain.
For Your Grammarian Soul
You are entirely correct that this defies standard English conventions.If the restaurant is owned by Papa John, it should be Papa John's (singular possessive).
If the restaurant is owned by multiple Papas, and those Papas are all named John, it should theoretically be Papa Johns' (plural possessive).
Papa Johns has no possessive marker at all. It treats the name as a compound, pluralized noun functioning purely as a trademark.
The Silver Lining (Sort Of)
While their logos, pizza boxes, and websites all scream Papa Johns, the official corporate entity remains Papa John’s International, Inc. The company kept the apostrophe in its formal legal name even while abandoning it in its advertising.You can take some comfort in knowing that on a strictly legal document, the rules of grammar still hold some sway. But on the storefront, the grammarian in you will have to look away.
His surname may be "Johns" as a shorting of Jones or Johnson.
It's not necessarily a plural
️ -
R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
