@stefano Thanks for the Time Machine blog writeup — I think I've fixed it not working on Tahoe, and a clue was in your post: you had Samba 4.19, I had 4.22, and it turns out 4.22 doesn't work with Tahoe+TM without a patch, now applied :)
-
@stefano Thanks for the Time Machine blog writeup — I think I've fixed it not working on Tahoe, and a clue was in your post: you had Samba 4.19, I had 4.22, and it turns out 4.22 doesn't work with Tahoe+TM without a patch, now applied

-
@stefano Thanks for the Time Machine blog writeup — I think I've fixed it not working on Tahoe, and a clue was in your post: you had Samba 4.19, I had 4.22, and it turns out 4.22 doesn't work with Tahoe+TM without a patch, now applied

@jamesoff great! But I'm also using one with:
samba423-4.23.4
and it works. Maybe they fixed in 4.23? -
@jamesoff great! But I'm also using one with:
samba423-4.23.4
and it works. Maybe they fixed in 4.23?@stefano I also moved up to 4.23 but just applied the patch without testing without it and it applied cleanly and works - but yes maybe not needed. I’ll test more later

-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
-
@stefano I also moved up to 4.23 but just applied the patch without testing without it and it applied cleanly and works - but yes maybe not needed. I’ll test more later

@jamesoff Perfect. I'm glad it works
-
@jamesoff Perfect. I'm glad it works
@stefano not as glad as I am after spending the money on the hardware for it!

-
@stefano Thanks for the Time Machine blog writeup — I think I've fixed it not working on Tahoe, and a clue was in your post: you had Samba 4.19, I had 4.22, and it turns out 4.22 doesn't work with Tahoe+TM without a patch, now applied

-
-
-