"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes all hail Beebo the God of War!
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes 198-fucking-3. How far we've come.
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes hard to find any publication not gormlessly sanewashing this anymore
you could just not provide positive framing for dumb bullshit, who knew
-
R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
You do know that it's owned by the Daily Mail since 2021?
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes if you deploy LLMs into command shaped spaces, and ask it for definitive answers, it will find a way to create answer shaped continuation without commitment toward anything other than the social contract of the immediate conversation. It's flipping a coin with extra steps while the coin simulates an anxiety disorder the whole time.
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
I, uh, I like the cut o' yer jib, ser.
-
You do know that it's owned by the Daily Mail since 2021?
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes It's the standard "AI is powerful, but Is AI *too* powerful?" tabloid crap to distract from the fact that AI isn't ready for production and might never be.
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes how about a nice game of chess?
-
@davey_cakes It's the standard "AI is powerful, but Is AI *too* powerful?" tabloid crap to distract from the fact that AI isn't ready for production and might never be.
@AlSweigart better that we worry if the tech could someday birth a malevolent god, than notice current real harms up to and including crimes that national governments are adopting a firm of stance of
on. -
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
Expensive auto-complete keeps defaulting to "kill all humans"
-
@davey_cakes It's the standard "AI is powerful, but Is AI *too* powerful?" tabloid crap to distract from the fact that AI isn't ready for production and might never be.
@AlSweigart @davey_cakes I assumed this was in response to Pete Hegseth telling Anthropic he needs the guard rails removed for the military use of Claude.
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes @RhinosWorryMe NS went off the rails some time ago tbh.
-
"Advanced AI models appear willing to deploy nuclear weapons without the same reservations humans have when put into simulated geopolitical crises."
Jesus fucking christ, what happened to New Scientist.
LLMs do not have will, this is a numpty playing with text generators and everyone in the chain of this being published needs to have their crayons taken away for a week.
Fuck me.
FURBYS RECOMMEND SCORCHED EARTH TACTICS WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE FUTURE
@davey_cakes it's insane to me that for decades we've put all our fears and worries of annihilation and war into killer robots and now we've developed the ultimate "expectation assimilation" robot and the media has gone into a frenzy downward spiral where they feed those worries into the robot and the robot assimilates to those expectations and they take that to confirm those worries and continue the cycle. -
R relay@relay.mycrowd.ca shared this topic
