The Open Source community never learned that big tech is not trustworthy.

[tante@tldr.nettime.org]

The Open Source community never learned that big tech is not trustworthy.
Maybe this time?

(based on https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zuckerberg_-_dumb_fucks.png)

[openhuman@mastodon.online]

@tante allerdings geht das Problem ja nicht weg vielleicht ist es nur so ein Lizenzierung Problem bei GitHub, die Crawler werden überall suchen

[_ryekdarkener_@mastodon.social]

@tante

Nope.

[korbs@social.sudovanilla.org]

@tante Codeberg my beloved

[gkrnours@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@tante the original remind me of high school. We had a unique feature, one was half day every other week where teacher offered random course. Once, a student offered to do one on cyber-security. One of the slide was how he contacted a bunch of his friend, asked their password and a whole third gave the password, no question asked. Another third asked why then gave their password.
It was between 2005 and 2008, I hope things improves since

[owl@gts.u8.is]

@tante being corporate-friendly was the point of open source from the beginning.

One of the reasons behind using the term was that "the advantage of using the term open source is that the business world usually tries to keep free technologies from being installed." Those people who adopted the term used the opportunity before the release of Navigator's source code to free themselves of the ideological and confrontational connotations of the term "free software".

Open-source software movement - Wikipedia

(en.wikipedia.org)