Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux one of the worst parts of this was learning that the Proton-GE dev is a slop supporter as well.
-
@gamingonlinux Your stated opinion in the piece, stating "Every extra person using all these AI tools is only adding to the issue." and "Not just that but copyright becomes an issue. Who actually owns the generated code? And now it's being hidden, how can anyone tell? Can you even truly claim it's open source when it's using AI generated code?" belies an ignorance of software development and an unhelpful bias of reporting. Open source projects don't need idiots swarming them.
1) Well, more people using it is a fact that they will need to keep expanding. Saying otherwise is just ignorant.
2) Copyright is an issue. Again, you must be insanely ignorant if you don't think it is. The US even just struck down copyright for AI generated works. Look it up.
Perhaps get informed before making stupid replies at me?
-
If you are an experienced developer, LLM tools speed up coding ~30% and the code is as maintainable as human code downstream.
- YouTube
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
(www.youtube.com)
The licensing issue is gross, and there is a question on consolidating yet more power in US tech companies. Alternatives are available that don't have those issues.
@james_baker @aho What are the alternatives ? (Genuine question, not trying to be rude)
Are they listed in the video
? (not home currently, so couldn't watch) -
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux
"I use high quality tools"A chat bot isn't a tool. It's a toy.
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux The main issue I have with this is them hiding which parts are AI generated. Open-source should always have that clearly labelled, as anything AI generated really
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
Could be much worse. At least they HAVE one real existing developer.;)
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux I don't use Lutris since all of my games are on Steam, but now I will for sure never use Lutris, ever
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux You gotta be shitting me...
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux
It would be OK if instead of code generated once someone ai-happy committed their prompt. Then the build pipeline can generate the same code using some future #siliconiac sidekick – from this preserved prompt. No need to look and tinker as it for decades to come should just compile and link. As the side effect of above us all crazy advocates of repeatable builds, rigid maintenance preplanners, and security paranoics will be free to mount our old unicorns and trot into oblivion... -
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux is lutris really all managed by one single Dev alone?
Actually I will not blame a solo Dev for deciding to use AI on a personal project, especially if the alternative would be that lutis would stop being maintained.
An overworked Dev can make just as many mistakes, as a good AI can...
So perhaps we should all ask first, what we could do to convince the Dev that AI is not needed for this project.
-
@gamingonlinux is lutris really all managed by one single Dev alone?
Actually I will not blame a solo Dev for deciding to use AI on a personal project, especially if the alternative would be that lutis would stop being maintained.
An overworked Dev can make just as many mistakes, as a good AI can...
So perhaps we should all ask first, what we could do to convince the Dev that AI is not needed for this project.
@feyter @gamingonlinux Yeah, I mean if this isn’t even their full time gig, I can’t say I blame them.
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
I see lots of people trashing the Lutris creator in replies on that link. Despite clearly saying he turned to AI to help with the backlog he faced, not one person has offered to step in and help, and give him an alternative.
It's a typical self entitled reaction by some users to free software development.
-
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux AI once, dead forever.
-
I see lots of people trashing the Lutris creator in replies on that link. Despite clearly saying he turned to AI to help with the backlog he faced, not one person has offered to step in and help, and give him an alternative.
It's a typical self entitled reaction by some users to free software development.
This. Many times, this!
-
I see lots of people trashing the Lutris creator in replies on that link. Despite clearly saying he turned to AI to help with the backlog he faced, not one person has offered to step in and help, and give him an alternative.
It's a typical self entitled reaction by some users to free software development.
@mackaj @gamingonlinux If it can't be done without AI, it should not be done at all.
Better no software than AI garbage. -
Lutris now being built with Claude AI, developer decides to hide it after backlash https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/03/lutris-now-being-built-with-claude-ai-developer-decides-to-hide-it-after-backlash/
@gamingonlinux I used to recommend Lutris for people trying to move to Linux who play games. I guess I can't anymore.
-
@james_baker @aho What are the alternatives ? (Genuine question, not trying to be rude)
Are they listed in the video
? (not home currently, so couldn't watch)@kjv I never got Lutris to work on several computers and Linux distros.
I started using Heroic recently, and that went flawless right away. -
I see lots of people trashing the Lutris creator in replies on that link. Despite clearly saying he turned to AI to help with the backlog he faced, not one person has offered to step in and help, and give him an alternative.
It's a typical self entitled reaction by some users to free software development.
@mackaj @gamingonlinux The alternative is obvious. A fork with the code as PD, since the code can no longer be GPL.
-
I agree. We should be celebrating any successful FOSS project and not criticise them for using what is now industry standard tools.
Do you care what PC they run their dev setup on and how ethically sourced their components were? Do you care what energy powers their home/workplace? Do you care if they use a spell checker or linter?
This may just be outrage du jour.
@james_baker @gunther @gamingonlinux We care about the license the code is under, because that is an open source license - the same one being violated by the AI generated commits.
-
@gamingonlinux
Better use Local LLM's and only use Training Data from legal licenses. Actually CC0, MIT or BSD Licenses could be compatible with legally AI training i guess. We need better Licensing on AI Training Data.@Chris2000SP @gamingonlinux Even if the training data was untainted, the AI generated code cannot be GPLed, because it was not generated by a human.