Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. YES, MORE!

YES, MORE!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
3 Posts 3 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.placeA This user is from outside of this forum
    afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.placeA This user is from outside of this forum
    afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.place
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    YES, MORE!

    Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
    domo@pizza.enby.cityD psychicparrot42@mastodon.gamedev.placeP 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.placeA afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.place

      YES, MORE!

      Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
      domo@pizza.enby.cityD This user is from outside of this forum
      domo@pizza.enby.cityD This user is from outside of this forum
      domo@pizza.enby.city
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @afreytes oh neat, I'm not on that platform, but I did find an article complaining about it, and it gave a great overview for those that want to know:

      A newly proposed tax on high-value second homes in New York City is quickly becoming a flashpoint in the state’s broader debate over wealth, investment and how to close the city’s growing budget gap.

      The proposal, backed by Gov. Kathy Hochul and praised by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, would place an annual surcharge on secondary residences in the city valued at $5 million or more. Supporters argue the measure would require owners of ultra-luxury properties that sit largely unused to contribute more toward public services at a time when city finances are under pressure.

      The plan is being framed by its backers as a way to raise substantial revenue without increasing taxes on primary residences or broadening the burden to working- and middle-class New Yorkers. City officials have also tied the measure to efforts to preserve core services and fund priorities such as child care and other affordability programs.

      After that, the article starts complaining that rich people are sad or whatever, so I won't even link it, but it's great to see mamdani doing some good basics!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.placeA afreytes@mastodon.gamedev.place

        YES, MORE!

        Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
        psychicparrot42@mastodon.gamedev.placeP This user is from outside of this forum
        psychicparrot42@mastodon.gamedev.placeP This user is from outside of this forum
        psychicparrot42@mastodon.gamedev.place
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @afreytes 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 awww poor scaredy rich bastards 🤣🤣🤣🤣

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • System shared this topic
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups