While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano 40 commits
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano It‘s crazy to me how someone would think that a PR with just the title V3.0 and no other comments, that changes basically everything about a projects code, would be able to get any kind of acceptance
Also: Didn’t know about this project of yours, that looks convenient
-
M mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social shared this topic
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
A big
to you
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe WTF. At the very least each commit should have been its own PR. -
@stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe WTF. At the very least each commit should have been its own PR.
@divVerent @stefano Well, the commits themselves look rather odd at times (e.g. the reset link), so I guess they reflect the interaction history the committer had with their "co-author" more than individual features.
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano The lazyness in this PR is insane, they didn't even bother to do the absolute minimum.
Feels like a slap in the face, downright disrespectful.
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano The operator had to pay for the usage of the LLM and you had to waste a bit of your time.
Both of you lost. But yours was unintentional.
I couldn't hate more the 'agents' that are deployed just to earn github-points and internet-points (and probably to introduce backdoors here and there).
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano You must have the patience of a saint. I can't think of a generous intention behind an inexplicable ~ +6000/-1000 line change across 37 files!
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano 40 commits, 6.5k lines of code, zero description. That person has to be out of their mind to think that you would accept this.
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
@stefano Whoa! If that’s not a reason to reject a PR, I don’t know what is
OTOH, I learned about this neat little tool of yours.
-
While I understand the good intentions behind this, I had to reject the pull request.
NotiMail can be forked, but it’s not meant to be managed by AI.
This post is deleted!
