Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. The Linux Foundation spends 2% of its money on Linux (kernel) and twice as much on "blockchain".

The Linux Foundation spends 2% of its money on Linux (kernel) and twice as much on "blockchain".

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
28 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • swelljoe@mas.toS swelljoe@mas.to

    @neverpanic @bagder thanks for the heads up. I didn't read very deeply. Still mad about the Linux Foundation supporting blockchain projects at any level. It's like supporting the pig butchering scam industry.

    neverpanic@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    neverpanic@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
    neverpanic@chaos.social
    wrote last edited by
    #11

    @swelljoe @bagder Agree on that. Blockchain is a solution looking for a problem, if not for cryptocurrencies, which have their own well-documented problems like enabling the ransomware industry.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • julsboo@mamot.frJ julsboo@mamot.fr

      @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder Blockchain isn't an industry, it's a technology. You can kill a pig with a knife, you can also use it to mince a cucumber

      stiiin@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
      stiiin@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
      stiiin@infosec.space
      wrote last edited by
      #12

      @julsboo @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder I have yet to come across an application of a blockchain for a purpose that isn't more effectively served through any other means.

      julsboo@mamot.frJ neverpanic@chaos.socialN K 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • stiiin@infosec.spaceS stiiin@infosec.space

        @julsboo @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder I have yet to come across an application of a blockchain for a purpose that isn't more effectively served through any other means.

        julsboo@mamot.frJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julsboo@mamot.frJ This user is from outside of this forum
        julsboo@mamot.fr
        wrote last edited by
        #13

        @stiiin @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder I agree, but it's not surprising when you consider that the first decentralized blockchain with a public ledger is less than 20 years old and the rough idea is barely 2 or 3 decades older. The technology could prove useful in ensuring the security of the package supply chain, but that is well beyond my expertise; I imagine the Linux Foundation funds research in this area, but not the toxic industries that embody it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • stiiin@infosec.spaceS stiiin@infosec.space

          @julsboo @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder I have yet to come across an application of a blockchain for a purpose that isn't more effectively served through any other means.

          neverpanic@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          neverpanic@chaos.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
          neverpanic@chaos.social
          wrote last edited by
          #14

          @stiiin well, if you consider buying illicit drugs and extortion through ransomware an application, there is a very good use case for it.

          @julsboo @swelljoe

          stiiin@infosec.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • swelljoe@mas.toS swelljoe@mas.to

            The Linux Foundation spends 2% of its money on Linux (kernel) and twice as much on "blockchain". https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml

            knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            knowprose@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #15

            @swelljoe I was a member, once upon a time, and it did not feel like they were pointed in the right direction years ago.

            Sad to see what it has become.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • swelljoe@mas.toS swelljoe@mas.to

              The Linux Foundation spends 2% of its money on Linux (kernel) and twice as much on "blockchain". https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml

              cholling@bytes.programming.devC This user is from outside of this forum
              cholling@bytes.programming.devC This user is from outside of this forum
              cholling@bytes.programming.dev
              wrote last edited by
              #16

              @swelljoe This is how they finally get me to switch to BSD?

              swelljoe@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • neverpanic@chaos.socialN neverpanic@chaos.social

                @stiiin well, if you consider buying illicit drugs and extortion through ransomware an application, there is a very good use case for it.

                @julsboo @swelljoe

                stiiin@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                stiiin@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                stiiin@infosec.space
                wrote last edited by
                #17

                @neverpanic @julsboo @swelljoe Even for money launderers, there are no upsides. All illegal activities are on a public ledger, barely pseudonymised and non-repudiable. I don't know enough about the inner workings of the network's protocol and architecture to judge the OPSEC of running one's own full node vs. that of depending on one ran by a third party. But even if a transaction can't be traced back to an IP address (and thus to a person) that way, there's always the question of getting real money, goods, or services in and out.

                swelljoe@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • stiiin@infosec.spaceS stiiin@infosec.space

                  @julsboo @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder I have yet to come across an application of a blockchain for a purpose that isn't more effectively served through any other means.

                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                  kneoghau@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #18

                  @stiiin @julsboo @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder I'm sure there's plenty of people on Facebook and twitter saying the same thing about decentralised social media networks. How many hacks, exploits, and outages has the bitcoin blockchain experienced over the last ~20 years compared to the average centralised network, especially considering the potential financial gains for hacking or disrupting bitcoin core network.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gokushrm@mastodon.socialG gokushrm@mastodon.social

                    @swelljoe we need a 1 complete Linux OS instead of 20 different distro to fight against window & mac

                    jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackemled@furry.engineer
                    wrote last edited by
                    #19

                    @GOKUSHRM @swelljoe Linux is just a kernel. That's why so many different operating systems use it. You're welcome to make your own complete operating system using Linux.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • swelljoe@mas.toS swelljoe@mas.to

                      The Linux Foundation spends 2% of its money on Linux (kernel) and twice as much on "blockchain". https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml

                      michaelormsby@mastodon.artM This user is from outside of this forum
                      michaelormsby@mastodon.artM This user is from outside of this forum
                      michaelormsby@mastodon.art
                      wrote last edited by
                      #20

                      @swelljoe Not disputing original post but a solid operating system should have less churn than other software. Once it works just leave it alone unless there’s good reason to fix it. Kind of like the foundation of a structure. Pour it, waterproof it, bury it, and forget about it. One surviving aqueduct is 2.5 millennia old.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • swelljoe@mas.toS swelljoe@mas.to

                        The Linux Foundation spends 2% of its money on Linux (kernel) and twice as much on "blockchain". https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml

                        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
                        fishidwardrobe@mastodon.me.uk
                        wrote last edited by
                        #21

                        @swelljoe so… 4%? probably more important to ask where the other 94% goes?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • cholling@bytes.programming.devC cholling@bytes.programming.dev

                          @swelljoe This is how they finally get me to switch to BSD?

                          swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                          swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                          swelljoe@mas.to
                          wrote last edited by
                          #22

                          @cholling I don't know why that would be so. It seems like the Linux Foundation has very little to do with Linux.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • stiiin@infosec.spaceS stiiin@infosec.space

                            @neverpanic @julsboo @swelljoe Even for money launderers, there are no upsides. All illegal activities are on a public ledger, barely pseudonymised and non-repudiable. I don't know enough about the inner workings of the network's protocol and architecture to judge the OPSEC of running one's own full node vs. that of depending on one ran by a third party. But even if a transaction can't be traced back to an IP address (and thus to a person) that way, there's always the question of getting real money, goods, or services in and out.

                            swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                            swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                            swelljoe@mas.to
                            wrote last edited by
                            #23

                            @stiiin @neverpanic @julsboo no, cryptocurrency is good for crime. It's true you can trace where the money goes in terms of addresses, but law enforcement is only rarely able to identify the person who owns the address. And, they're often operating in places with no extradition treaty or cooperative government. No banks, no know your customer laws.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • swelljoe@mas.toS swelljoe@mas.to

                              The Linux Foundation spends 2% of its money on Linux (kernel) and twice as much on "blockchain". https://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/Over_97_of_the_Linux_Foundation_s_Budget_Goes_Not_to_Linux.shtml

                              mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mjg59@nondeterministic.computer
                              wrote last edited by
                              #24

                              @swelljoe That's a list of the sector of organisations that belong to the LF. This is the budget breakdown, which shows 3% being spent directly on the kernel. Some amount of the funding for other projects is also going to contribute to the kernel in various ways.

                              But, fundamentally, the LF is a trade organisation and an umbrella for multiple other foundations. A lot of the money given to them is earmarked for specific purposes, they can't just choose to spend it on the kernel.

                              Link Preview Image
                              swelljoe@mas.toS mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM 2 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • swelljoe@mas.toS swelljoe@mas.to

                                @neverpanic @bagder thanks for the heads up. I didn't read very deeply. Still mad about the Linux Foundation supporting blockchain projects at any level. It's like supporting the pig butchering scam industry.

                                mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mjg59@nondeterministic.computer
                                wrote last edited by
                                #25

                                @swelljoe @neverpanic @bagder I'd expect a lot of those blockchain companies to be members of the Hyperledger Foundation, which is mostly focused on non-cryptocurrency uses of blockchain technology.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM mjg59@nondeterministic.computer

                                  @swelljoe That's a list of the sector of organisations that belong to the LF. This is the budget breakdown, which shows 3% being spent directly on the kernel. Some amount of the funding for other projects is also going to contribute to the kernel in various ways.

                                  But, fundamentally, the LF is a trade organisation and an umbrella for multiple other foundations. A lot of the money given to them is earmarked for specific purposes, they can't just choose to spend it on the kernel.

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  swelljoe@mas.to
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #26

                                  @mjg59 I can't find explanation of what that chart is in the the text, so I'm not actually sure what it represents. "Serving Nearly 1,500 Open Source Project Communities" makes me think "giving some kind of support to" rather than "receiving some kind of support from". And "Communities" aint got money. I assumed the big "Project Support" category was what the "Serving" chart applied to.

                                  So, is it misleadingly labeled? Am I missing somewhere in the text the chart is explained?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM mjg59@nondeterministic.computer

                                    @swelljoe That's a list of the sector of organisations that belong to the LF. This is the budget breakdown, which shows 3% being spent directly on the kernel. Some amount of the funding for other projects is also going to contribute to the kernel in various ways.

                                    But, fundamentally, the LF is a trade organisation and an umbrella for multiple other foundations. A lot of the money given to them is earmarked for specific purposes, they can't just choose to spend it on the kernel.

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mjg59@nondeterministic.computer
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #27

                                    @swelljoe And, in general, the reliability of Techrights is summed up by https://techrights.org/i/2025/12/case-judgment-summary.html

                                    swelljoe@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mjg59@nondeterministic.computerM mjg59@nondeterministic.computer

                                      @swelljoe And, in general, the reliability of Techrights is summed up by https://techrights.org/i/2025/12/case-judgment-summary.html

                                      swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      swelljoe@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      swelljoe@mas.to
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #28

                                      @mjg59 lol. Incredible. I gotta stay out of the dark corners of the internet (Hacker News). It's leading me to bad places.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups