You did it!

[dasra@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Yes!

[howtheyvoteeu@eupolicy.social]

@aetios @Tutanota The link I posted was the final vote in plenary, that ultimately failed. The screenshot above is from the vote on Amendment 35, which you can find on our site under the amendment section of the final vote. Hope this clarifies things

[connynasch@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota

[laurielle@mastodon.art]

@Tutanota This is great! Question, where are you getting the picture from? I'm checking the EU website and the difference seems to be quite bigger that 1 MP (lucky us) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040_EN.html#_section4

[aetios@sns.minovsky.space]

@HowTheyVoteEU @Tutanota Thank you, that helps a bunch! Despite following EU politics for several years already, I still get lost now and then!

[rtr@mastorol.es]

@Laurielle la imagen es de la votacion de la enmienda 34

[justinmac84@mastodon.social]

@Tutanota Wait what? I didn't think private message scanning was ever approved. I thought it kept being blocked and they kept trying to bring it back.

[landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@Tutanota Let me attempt cool aunt mode...

Rare EU W

[landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@zeitfalle 2 would be my guess.

[laurielle@mastodon.art]

@rtr Aaaah eso explica

[chantology@mastodon.gamedev.place]

@Tutanota finally good news

[lumiukko@metalhead.club]

@HowTheyVoteEU @aetios @Tutanota Another question: Where do you get the title for a proposition from? I couldn't find it on the europarl website, and I thought it is pretty strange to add the purpose of a proposal (here: to "combat online child sexual abuse") in the title.

[rhizomancer@todon.eu]

@Tutanota

[artie@mastodon.novotnykrystof.com]

@Tutanota That's it. The chains are starting to crack.

[the_universality@mastodon.novotnykrystof.com]

@Tutanota I'm happy and incredibly disappointed that it hadn't passed by just ONE.

This is frightening that it has so much support.

[boud@framapiaf.org]

@HowTheyVoteEU @aetios @Tutanota

Looks like you need to find the "Amendments" section at top of [1] to find Amendment 34 (Am 34) [2], which passed by 307 vs 306. IIUC, Am 34 put strong restrictions requiring specific justification to justify spying, and forbidding spying that bypasses E2EE.

IIUC, if the vote on the overall Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 had passed, then thanks to Am 34, the regulation would have hypothetically been weakened.

[1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040_EN.html
[2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-10-2026-0040-AM-004-006_EN.pdf

[omar@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@Laurielle

that's all gibberish in this report.

seriously, who understand that convoluted crap?

@Tutanota

[howtheyvoteeu@eupolicy.social]

@lumiukko Great question! It’s the official title of the legislative procedure the vote belongs to: https://oeil.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/en/procedure-file?reference=2025/0429(COD)

We use that as a fall-back, until all data from Parliament has been uploaded. This is also why you might see this changing at some point.

We don’t editorialize titles or hand-pick them.

[nemobis@mamot.fr]

@Laurielle AM34 passed with 307 votes and the final text only got 228. The 80 votes lost (mostly among Greens, Left, Renew) were presumably people who voted for the amendment not because they liked it but because they knew EPP wouldn't like it. 157 MEPs in the EPP voted against the amendment and 137 ended up voting against the final text once it passed.

Cf. https://framapiaf.org/@boud/116295844606323488

#EUpolicy #ChatControl

[nini@oldbytes.space]

@Tutanota At least until they want to try again, they're pretty relentless about pushing snooping charters through.