Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I want this but as a Linux distribution.

I want this but as a Linux distribution.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
132 Posts 74 Posters 26 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • johnlehet@mas.toJ johnlehet@mas.to

    One thing for sure, I’ve got a fire under my butt to get out of 1password pretty quick.

    maaneeack@noc.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    maaneeack@noc.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    maaneeack@noc.social
    wrote last edited by
    #64

    @johnlehet @mcc I knew 1password was getting worse, my renewal is soon and that's not happening now. Someone in thread said keepass 2.x isn't infected with AI. There's passwordstore.org and passky.org which I just learned about. Honestly I'm not sure what to try, this is a big PITA.

    johnlehet@mas.toJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

      RE: https://mastodon.scot/@kim_harding/116108957641748718

      I want this but as a Linux distribution. I don't think I'm asking for much here. I am just asking for the "open source community" to be to the left of Goldman Sachs

      dramforever@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      dramforever@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
      dramforever@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #65

      @mcc So uh I have bad news about this Linux thing...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lunarloony@dosgame.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
        lunarloony@dosgame.clubL This user is from outside of this forum
        lunarloony@dosgame.club
        wrote last edited by
        #66

        @nina_kali_nina I was tempted to do Vaultwarden, but the Bitwarden clients are affected so I don't think that'd help much. Might be an okay stop-gap until I have the time to invest in it properly.

        lhengstmengel@mastodon.nlL 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

          My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

          Internal server error · GitHub

          favicon

          (github.com)

          csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
          csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
          csolisr@hub.azkware.net
          wrote last edited by
          #67
          @mcc Which reminds me, how is the reimplementation of Bitwarden, Vaultwarden, doing in that regard? I'm using the latter precisely because I'm wary of depending on a commercial product that happens to be open-source, but can yank the open licensing at any point in time.
          mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

            @itamarst Well, there is no universe where I would consider using 1password, but I guess that's still good to know

            drangnon@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            drangnon@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            drangnon@hachyderm.io
            wrote last edited by
            #68

            @mcc @itamarst I thought KeePassXC required human reviews / unit tests in order to mitigate any llm harms. Did that change?

            More broadly, I don't really see how you can prove no LLMs were involved in code contributions if they are actually contributed by a human. Prove you used emacs or vi and didn't compile it ever on a cloud service? (I'm not happy about that state of affairs, mind you)

            I suppose we can start adding some sort of watermark on code?

            mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wideeyedcurious@mstdn.socialW wideeyedcurious@mstdn.social

              @Lingmops @mcc I’m beginning to feel as if I’m gonna need to head back to just saving my pswds in a text file on my computer again. 🫤

              csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
              csolisr@hub.azkware.netC This user is from outside of this forum
              csolisr@hub.azkware.net
              wrote last edited by
              #69
              @WideEyedCurious @Lingmops @mcc Wondering if there's a way to save OTP derivation keys in an encrypted file, then use the CLI to decrypt and then derive the current six-digit code.
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                My understanding is that Bitwarden and KeePassXC, the two open source password managers, are *both* using random code generators at this point, which is terrifying as those are the exact tools where a small error could have the largest negative impact, and also tools that once you've committed to using it you can't quickly back out if they enter a code quality decline

                Internal server error · GitHub

                favicon

                (github.com)

                eladnarra@disabled.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                eladnarra@disabled.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                eladnarra@disabled.social
                wrote last edited by
                #70

                @mcc Aw man that sucks. Why would they... Ugh.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • luana@wetdry.worldL luana@wetdry.world

                  @mcc @ariadne hmmm there’s probably some really awful way to hack this into NixOS if you want to compile your whole system

                  xarvos@outerheaven.clubX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xarvos@outerheaven.clubX This user is from outside of this forum
                  xarvos@outerheaven.club
                  wrote last edited by
                  #71

                  @luana@wetdry.world @mcc@mastodon.social @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems wouldn't you have to have a database of packages that don't contain LLM-written code? i don't think it's readily available

                  ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA luana@wetdry.worldL 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • elfin@mstdn.socialE elfin@mstdn.social

                    @mcc KeePass 2 is clean.

                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                    wrote last edited by
                    #72

                    @elfin @mcc

                    If you're looking for an alternative to KeePassXC, GNOME Secrets is pretty much a drop-in replacement.

                    mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • johnlehet@mas.toJ johnlehet@mas.to

                      @mcc Excuse an undereducated question from a long term 1password user who is going to move from it now: is the issue with “random code generators” that random passwords generated by these apps are easy to crack?

                      I’m looking at moving to Keepassium and as I understand it each of these apps in this family have different code to do password generating and are thus all different.

                      zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zwol@masto.hackers.townZ This user is from outside of this forum
                      zwol@masto.hackers.town
                      wrote last edited by
                      #73

                      @johnlehet @mcc My educated guess is the problems are more likely to be things like

                      - sync protocol has a security flaw that makes it possible for malware in coffee shop wifi router to learn all your passwords

                      - sync protocol just plain stops working

                      - restoration of offline backups stops working, nobody notices for months

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                        @elfin @mcc

                        If you're looking for an alternative to KeePassXC, GNOME Secrets is pretty much a drop-in replacement.

                        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mcc@mastodon.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #74

                        @argv_minus_one @elfin that's great, but can it interop with a phone?

                        argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • drangnon@hachyderm.ioD drangnon@hachyderm.io

                          @mcc @itamarst I thought KeePassXC required human reviews / unit tests in order to mitigate any llm harms. Did that change?

                          More broadly, I don't really see how you can prove no LLMs were involved in code contributions if they are actually contributed by a human. Prove you used emacs or vi and didn't compile it ever on a cloud service? (I'm not happy about that state of affairs, mind you)

                          I suppose we can start adding some sort of watermark on code?

                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mcc@mastodon.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #75

                          @draNgNon @itamarst

                          "I thought KeePassXC required human reviews / unit tests in order to mitigate any llm harms. Did that change?"

                          I literally don't give a shit. If you think it's OK to generate computer source code from a neural network, I don't trust yr judgement enough to trust your code reviews.

                          "More broadly, I don't really see how you can prove no LLMs were involved in code contributions if they are actually contributed by a human."

                          Same way you enforce any policy against stolen code

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • xarvos@outerheaven.clubX xarvos@outerheaven.club

                            @luana@wetdry.world @mcc@mastodon.social @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems wouldn't you have to have a database of packages that don't contain LLM-written code? i don't think it's readily available

                            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ariadne@social.treehouse.systemsA This user is from outside of this forum
                            ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
                            wrote last edited by
                            #76

                            @mcc @luana @xarvos that is indeed the problem

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                              @argv_minus_one @elfin that's great, but can it interop with a phone?

                              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                              argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #77

                              @mcc @elfin

                              Can you be more specific? I wasn't under the impression that KeePassXC runs on phones.

                              mcc@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • csolisr@hub.azkware.netC csolisr@hub.azkware.net
                                @mcc Which reminds me, how is the reimplementation of Bitwarden, Vaultwarden, doing in that regard? I'm using the latter precisely because I'm wary of depending on a commercial product that happens to be open-source, but can yank the open licensing at any point in time.
                                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mcc@mastodon.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #78

                                @csolisr i'm told elsewhere in thread that vaultwarden has not accepted AI code, but vaultwarden replaces the *server*, not the client, right?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                                  @mcc @elfin

                                  Can you be more specific? I wasn't under the impression that KeePassXC runs on phones.

                                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mcc@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  mcc@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #79

                                  @argv_minus_one @elfin I do not use keepassxc

                                  EDIT: checking google there *is* a "Keepass2Android", one assumes forked from the original keepass

                                  gaditb@icosahedron.websiteG cuddle_puddle@mastodon.catgirl.cloudC 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • xarvos@outerheaven.clubX xarvos@outerheaven.club

                                    @luana@wetdry.world @mcc@mastodon.social @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems wouldn't you have to have a database of packages that don't contain LLM-written code? i don't think it's readily available

                                    luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    luana@wetdry.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    luana@wetdry.world
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #80

                                    @ariadne @mcc @xarvos that would be the pretty way. Another pretty way would be having nixpkgs maintainers add that info.

                                    I said it was an awful way that would require full system building for a reason, I imagine it’s possible to override the default check phase or even the fetchers to check the downloaded src for .copilot and alike and fail if present.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • maaneeack@noc.socialM maaneeack@noc.social

                                      @johnlehet @mcc I knew 1password was getting worse, my renewal is soon and that's not happening now. Someone in thread said keepass 2.x isn't infected with AI. There's passwordstore.org and passky.org which I just learned about. Honestly I'm not sure what to try, this is a big PITA.

                                      johnlehet@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      johnlehet@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      johnlehet@mas.to
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #81

                                      @maaneeack @mcc StrongBox has been sold to a company with maybe iffy success with the products they have acquired. I had first hand experience with their mess-up of the Mac utility Bartender, which I bailed on after their version.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • wideeyedcurious@mstdn.socialW wideeyedcurious@mstdn.social

                                        @Lingmops @mcc I’m beginning to feel as if I’m gonna need to head back to just saving my pswds in a text file on my computer again. 🫤

                                        mozziediver@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mozziediver@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mozziediver@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #82

                                        @WideEyedCurious
                                        If you're ok with local storage and local replication rather than "cloudy", there's pwsafe. You could keep the db in some less local storage, I guess.
                                        https://www.pwsafe.org/index.shtml

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mcc@mastodon.socialM mcc@mastodon.social

                                          @argv_minus_one @elfin I do not use keepassxc

                                          EDIT: checking google there *is* a "Keepass2Android", one assumes forked from the original keepass

                                          gaditb@icosahedron.websiteG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gaditb@icosahedron.websiteG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gaditb@icosahedron.website
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #83

                                          @mcc @argv_minus_one @elfin I use https://www.keepassdx.com/ on android, and sync the file over with Syncthing.

                                          I don't THINK either of those projects use LLMs, but I haven't been machmir about poring over careful details when checking.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups