I could joke about how real estate agents are writing the outage reports but I'm kinda not in the mood.

[munin@infosec.exchange]

RE: https://infosec.exchange/@0xabad1dea/116158961546098296

I could joke about how real estate agents are writing the outage reports but I'm kinda not in the mood.

This is just another instance of a large corp lying to its customers.

And personally, I am well past sick of being lied to - especially so obviously and unskilfully.

[munin@infosec.exchange]

Also, lol, acts of war are not covered by -any- insurance policy, so Amazon's gonna have to soak that loss.

[munin@infosec.exchange]

Fuck Bezos.

[nullpo@masto.hackers.town]

@munin that's the first thing that popped in my head when i heard rofl

[munin@infosec.exchange]

@nullpo

Yep. Should have someone write that up in the financial times, see if we can get the investor class to ditch amazon as too much of a risk for being involved.

[theeclecticdyslexic@mstdn.social]

@munin @nullpo honestly, I hope that becomes their general strategy. Attack unpopulated soft economic assets owned by US companies.

I can't think of a better set of targets to have someone else with influence try to convince the regime to back off.

[nullpo@masto.hackers.town]

@munin I don't even know how much overall impact one data center loss would be for amazon at this point, but it would be really fuckin funny if this causes business with the UAE to plummet due to the new risk lmao (I'm guessing that's where the data center is due to AWS and everyone trying to get business there)

[munin@infosec.exchange]

@nullpo

the investor class is not known for rational behavior.

[tindrasgrove@infosec.exchange]

@munin depending on the type of damage, might need even need war clause (at least for the cyber policy. May still be useful for property and such). Infrastructure exclusion (essentially, if your downtime is due to a loss of power or such) would also be worth keeping an eye on.