The U.S. State Dept is reportedly developing an online portal that will enable people in Europe and elsewhere to see content banned by their govts, "including alleged hate speech and terrorist propaganda," as a way to counter censorship.

[stevebellovin@infosec.exchange]

@kevinrothrock Does that include Colbert's interview with Talarico?

[kevinrothrock@infosec.exchange]

@SteveBellovin

[mdebal@vmst.io]

@kevinrothrock sooo countries just block freedumb.gov at the dns level? Unless the user is already on a vpn I don’t see how this will work. And in that case, the portal isn’t needed anymore. Either I’m missing the point or there are some really incompetent people in that department.

[kevinrothrock@infosec.exchange]

@mdebal this is a vibes-based administration, you see

[urwumpe@hessen.social]

@kevinrothrock Let me guess... they don't talk about Hungary.

[kevinrothrock@infosec.exchange]

@urwumpe only before a meal

[wackyideas@mastodon.social]

@kevinrothrock @gwaldby Meanwhile, #Epstein?

[hfinyow@mstdn.ca]

@kevinrothrock maybe European and other countries should create a similar site to allow users in the US to see un-censored TikTok or any other content that is even remotely pro-Palestine or anti-genocide

[kevinrothrock@infosec.exchange]

@hfinyow Is that censored in the US? Mainstream outlets and platform algorithms meddle left and right, but very little is legally blocked here in America.

[srtcd424@mas.to]

@kevinrothrock
Nobody tell the state department they've already been funding Tor for decades...

[hfinyow@mstdn.ca]

@kevinrothrock not censored but severely blocked...in some ways better than outright censorship because the viewer never even knows the content exists.

[kevinrothrock@infosec.exchange]

@hfinyow Agreed, but I still prefer corporate censorship over government censorship, if forced to choose.