Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
127 Posts 82 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • korrupt@nrw.socialK korrupt@nrw.social

    @inthehands meta noindex it is, definitely. robots disallow can actually hurt the process, since google cannot access the file with the noindex header and therefore won't deindex.
    btw, they do indeed respect noindex and robots.txt ATM, since its qute easy to check if pages still get found. Then again, you never know what does not show up in search but is used for training (without giving credit, obv.) anyway. As far as i see, google still remains more standard compliant as e.g. OpenAI.

    rndanger@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
    rndanger@infosec.exchangeR This user is from outside of this forum
    rndanger@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #86

    @korrupt @inthehands
    Then my question is: Will Google claim that their AI search isn't subject to the old conventions and use that data to train AI and serve those results in their new format?

    korrupt@nrw.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mjd@mathstodon.xyzM mjd@mathstodon.xyz

      @theothersimo @cceckman I didn't suggest “should be”. I will stand by “All information on the WWW is available to malicious actors”.

      You seem surprised at this fact, and say the premise is “idiotic”. Okay.

      theothersimo@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      theothersimo@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      theothersimo@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #87

      @mjd @cceckman your bank account is available to malicious actors, but not available unconditionally. That’s a very big caveat to overlook.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

        RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

        Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

        and •only because•

        they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

        Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that are fully breaking that contract. We should reciprocate.

        1/2

        blindcoder@toot.berlinB This user is from outside of this forum
        blindcoder@toot.berlinB This user is from outside of this forum
        blindcoder@toot.berlin
        wrote last edited by
        #88

        @inthehands I directly block on the webserver using https://perishablepress.com/ultimate-ai-block-list/ with a 403 Forbidden response.
        I include anything containing "google" in the list.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • mjd@mathstodon.xyzM mjd@mathstodon.xyz

          @cceckman The contract I thought I was signing was this: I published my stuff on a worldwide information network, with no controls whatever, specifically so that anyone anywhere could access it. I did that with full understanding that it would enable people I might not like to read, copy, and share it and put it to uses that I couldn't foresee and might not approve of. And if I didn't want to entertain that possibility I should not have installed a program on my computer whose sole purpose was to deliver of my stuff to any rando who asked for it.

          I'm not saying I got a good deal, or that I'm happy with the outcome. But I'm not going to pretend I was tricked or that Google reneged on a bargain. We had no bargain. I served them the stuff anyway, whenever they asked for it.

          And I'm not sure I believe Paul Cantrell when he says he thought the contract was different from what I said.

          albinanigans@blackqueer.lifeA This user is from outside of this forum
          albinanigans@blackqueer.lifeA This user is from outside of this forum
          albinanigans@blackqueer.life
          wrote last edited by
          #89

          @mjd @cceckman

          I want people to access my content, not have it regurgitated in some slurry machine. I didn't sign up for that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

            Quick strategy discussion, for those who understand Google indexing and SEO:

            If I want to yank a web site out of Google’s now-fully-extractive search, should I (1) disallow googlebot in robots.txt or (2) add `<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">` to all the page headers?

            The goal here is not just to remove my contributions to the commons from Google’s results, but to •make Google aware• that sites are pulling consent. What will best do that?

            2/2

            markwyner@mas.toM This user is from outside of this forum
            markwyner@mas.toM This user is from outside of this forum
            markwyner@mas.to
            wrote last edited by
            #90

            @inthehands crawlers choose whether or not they want to oblige robots.txt and meta noindex/nofollow.

            The proper way to do this is add agent detection on the server-side, and force a 403. This essentially refuses a request.

            This only works if you know all of the agents and they’re not using covert agents. Anyone can use any agent to crawl the web.

            But the 403 solution is pretty solid overall.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • khm@hj.9fs.netK khm@hj.9fs.net
              in nginx I have this
              if ($http_user_agent ~* (uptime|bot|index|spider|wler|brave)) { return 402 "Just send the money"; }
              it keeps out the riffraff.

              CC: @hyc@mastodon.social @inthehands@hachyderm.io
              ticho@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
              ticho@mas.toT This user is from outside of this forum
              ticho@mas.to
              wrote last edited by
              #91

              @khm @macronaut @hyc @inthehands I'm considering adding "agent" as one of the options for this regexp...

              khm@hj.9fs.netK 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                Quick strategy discussion, for those who understand Google indexing and SEO:

                If I want to yank a web site out of Google’s now-fully-extractive search, should I (1) disallow googlebot in robots.txt or (2) add `<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">` to all the page headers?

                The goal here is not just to remove my contributions to the commons from Google’s results, but to •make Google aware• that sites are pulling consent. What will best do that?

                2/2

                praxeology@post.lurk.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                praxeology@post.lurk.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                praxeology@post.lurk.org
                wrote last edited by
                #92

                @inthehands You could also set up a user-agent rule so that your web server gives the various google bots a tasty gas station sausage instead of the actual web page.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • wronglang@bayes.clubW wronglang@bayes.club

                  @ShadSterling @mjd @cceckman yeah fair, I only commented because this is one place the distinction matters in that a social contract exists in aggregate as a set of expectations regardless of what an individual might expect or feel like they agreed to 🤷

                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  S This user is from outside of this forum
                  shadsterling@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #93

                  @wronglang @mjd @cceckman right, which is distinct enough that it would be better to have a more distinct name for it

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                    Defeatism is form of surrender. Cynicism is surrender. Despair is surrender. Nihilism is surrender.

                    Our job is to •care• and to •keep caring• and to •keep doing and keep building• and to •endure• longer than them.

                    jedbrown@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jedbrown@hachyderm.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jedbrown@hachyderm.io
                    wrote last edited by
                    #94

                    @inthehands It's important to note that search indexing is considered "transformative" and thus fair use *because* it does not supplant the market for the original content. That goes out the window when the product functions to capture traffic that would otherwise go to the cites. They are acting with impunity, but existing copyright law addresses this if courts find it to be not transformative.

                    haihappen@social.anoxinon.deH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                      RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

                      Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

                      and •only because•

                      they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

                      Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that are fully breaking that contract. We should reciprocate.

                      1/2

                      markwyner@mas.toM This user is from outside of this forum
                      markwyner@mas.toM This user is from outside of this forum
                      markwyner@mas.to
                      wrote last edited by
                      #95

                      @inthehands for a while I was hesitant to block Google. They have a psychological grip on us. We’re made to feel like we must play their game or our site doesn’t exist.

                      Fuck that. I’m out. I’m gonna block all of their bots. It’s gonna be 403 city.

                      accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ticho@mas.toT ticho@mas.to

                        @khm @macronaut @hyc @inthehands I'm considering adding "agent" as one of the options for this regexp...

                        khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                        khm@hj.9fs.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                        khm@hj.9fs.net
                        wrote last edited by
                        #96
                        yeah, the most comon one of those is meta-externalagent but that gets matched by wler because the url included has the word 'crawler' in it

                        CC: @macronaut@mas.to @hyc@mastodon.social @inthehands@hachyderm.io
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                          @adamshostack

                          This is clearly how copyright law as written •should• work. Not sure if it’s how it •does• work, but if anybody’s trying, they have my sword.

                          ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
                          ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
                          ferrix@mastodon.online
                          wrote last edited by
                          #97

                          @inthehands @adamshostack it's transformative which makes it a very uncertain fight

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                            RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

                            Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

                            and •only because•

                            they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

                            Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that are fully breaking that contract. We should reciprocate.

                            1/2

                            gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gudenau@hachyderm.io
                            wrote last edited by
                            #98

                            @inthehands Good point, I ought to setup my stuff to serve robots.txt...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                              Quick strategy discussion, for those who understand Google indexing and SEO:

                              If I want to yank a web site out of Google’s now-fully-extractive search, should I (1) disallow googlebot in robots.txt or (2) add `<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">` to all the page headers?

                              The goal here is not just to remove my contributions to the commons from Google’s results, but to •make Google aware• that sites are pulling consent. What will best do that?

                              2/2

                              weizenspreu@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              weizenspreu@chaos.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              weizenspreu@chaos.social
                              wrote last edited by
                              #99

                              @inthehands This won‘t necessarily help prevent the ingestion into LLMs. Have a look at the TDM Reservation Protocol.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                                RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

                                Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

                                and •only because•

                                they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

                                Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that are fully breaking that contract. We should reciprocate.

                                1/2

                                coho@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                coho@climatejustice.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                coho@climatejustice.social
                                wrote last edited by
                                #100

                                @inthehands
                                There is a new fad called "data poisoning" that web sites are using to foil ai scraping. One music site put a Homer Simpson monologue into every track in its online data base. It starts a few seconds in and continues to the end. That's only one way it's being used. We need a generation of ai "monkey wrench gangs " to start sabotaging. It's really no different than what Edward Abbey talked about, instead of extractive earth raping machinery being targeted , it's data mining machinery.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                                  RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

                                  Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

                                  and •only because•

                                  they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

                                  Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that are fully breaking that contract. We should reciprocate.

                                  1/2

                                  nicelymanifest@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nicelymanifest@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nicelymanifest@mastodon.social
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #101

                                  @inthehands The days of 'do no evil' long forgotten. Money as well as power can deeply corrupt.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • inthehands@hachyderm.ioI inthehands@hachyderm.io

                                    RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

                                    Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

                                    and •only because•

                                    they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

                                    Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that are fully breaking that contract. We should reciprocate.

                                    1/2

                                    pionir@masto.bikeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pionir@masto.bikeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pionir@masto.bike
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #102

                                    @inthehands I came across a bit bomb for AI agents but I can't remember the name (sorry!). It worked by making a small zip payload extract to a massive file to overload the agent / crawlers. Not sure how well it works though. I'll see if I can find it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
                                    • schamschula@mastodon.socialS schamschula@mastodon.social

                                      @inthehands If they ignore robots.txt, they will be added to the block list in nginx.conf. My robots.txt has a note stating as much. There is plenty of company there!

                                      albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      albertcardona@mathstodon.xyzA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #103

                                      @schamschula @inthehands

                                      Mind sharing the necessary subset of the nginx config to enforce robots.txt as an nginx block list? Thank you.

                                      schamschula@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • markwyner@mas.toM markwyner@mas.to

                                        @inthehands for a while I was hesitant to block Google. They have a psychological grip on us. We’re made to feel like we must play their game or our site doesn’t exist.

                                        Fuck that. I’m out. I’m gonna block all of their bots. It’s gonna be 403 city.

                                        accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        accordionbruce@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        accordionbruce@mastodon.social
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #104

                                        @markwyner @inthehands
                                        There is a point where their search becomes bad enough that being on Google search has less and less payoff

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • jima@mspsocial.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jima@mspsocial.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                          jima@mspsocial.net
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #105

                                          @khm @inthehands I'm more interested in sending it to AI scrapers, not that they tend to identify themselves honestly. 🙄

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups