Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. 9GW datacentre approved.

9GW datacentre approved.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
109 Posts 68 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

    9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

    Link Preview Image
    New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

    The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

    favicon

    Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

    huntingdon@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    huntingdon@mstdn.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
    huntingdon@mstdn.social
    wrote last edited by
    #96

    @quixoticgeek

    It's a cinch that new 9 gw AI software data center in Utah won't be used to process your credit card purchases -- except as part of processing your entire personal file.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD dougfir@m.ai6yr.org

      @quixoticgeek
      Did you also note the proposed site is served by one 2 lane road? Back when they were building the natural gas pipeline, the one 6 room motel in the area was pretty busy. All other workers had to drive about 1½ hours from any sort of accommodation.

      dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      dougfir@m.ai6yr.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
      dougfir@m.ai6yr.org
      wrote last edited by
      #97

      @quixoticgeek
      I also note they want to use about 40,000 acres for this project. Google tells me it takes between 4-8,000 acres to produce 1 gigawatt of power. So they are claiming enough property to use solar power for the whole project.
      They might claim there is no producer able to make that many solar panels. But they have also not explained how they will source that much gas or steam turbine generating capacity.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

        @mycotropic @ehproque

        That's why the Colorado river never makes it as far as the sea. The whole river gets stolen.

        https://youtu.be/_0U0YWsuFpU?

        wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
        wesdym@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #98

        @quixoticgeek I'm not a small child. Is there a version of this made for grown-ups?

        quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wesdym@mastodon.socialW wesdym@mastodon.social

          @quixoticgeek I'm not a small child. Is there a version of this made for grown-ups?

          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
          quixoticgeek@social.v.st
          wrote last edited by
          #99

          @wesdym https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River

          This one ?

          wesdym@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

            @wesdym https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_River

            This one ?

            wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
            wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
            wesdym@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #100

            @quixoticgeek I'm talking about the video you linked. It's childish.

            quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • wesdym@mastodon.socialW wesdym@mastodon.social

              @quixoticgeek I'm talking about the video you linked. It's childish.

              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ This user is from outside of this forum
              quixoticgeek@social.v.st
              wrote last edited by
              #101

              @wesdym it's a half as interesting YouTube video. What else do you expect

              wesdym@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                @wesdym it's a half as interesting YouTube video. What else do you expect

                wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wesdym@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                wesdym@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #102

                @quixoticgeek You know what? I'm really just kind of done with your stupid childish shit at this point. You make ignorant remarks, link childish sources, make vague and meaningless excuses, and you write like fucking child. Bye.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • iwein@mas.toI iwein@mas.to

                  @bouriquet not much.

                  The heat itself from the datacenter is negligible compared to other sources of heat from the earth's perspective.

                  The CO2 emissions however are the problem, because they help trap heat from the sun.

                  The sun irradiates the earth with ~0.18EW which is around 10.000 times the power that human civilization uses in total. So adding a few GW to that isn't going to move the needle.

                  Except these datacenters run on fossil fuel 🤦‍♂️

                  @quixoticgeek

                  bouriquet@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bouriquet@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                  bouriquet@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #103

                  @iwein @quixoticgeek But the data centers typically use fresh water to cool the systems, rendering it contaminated

                  iwein@mas.toI 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ehproque@neopaquita.esE ehproque@neopaquita.es

                    @mycotropic @quixoticgeek you could make it policy that it has to rain every day

                    mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mycotropic@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mycotropic@beige.party
                    wrote last edited by
                    #104

                    @ehproque @quixoticgeek

                    Policy, top of the social, ecological model! Great choice! I'll send you a draft soon!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • bouriquet@mastodon.socialB bouriquet@mastodon.social

                      @iwein @quixoticgeek But the data centers typically use fresh water to cool the systems, rendering it contaminated

                      iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                      iwein@mas.toI This user is from outside of this forum
                      iwein@mas.to
                      wrote last edited by
                      #105

                      @bouriquet definitely. And definitely datacenter bad. They're just not killing this particular fairy 🙂

                      @quixoticgeek

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                        @artemis ok. So natural gas is because for many years the gas network in most places was derived from coal gas, or town gas, whereby coal was heated up to produce coke, which was used in things like steel production, and the gas was then piped locally to homes and businesses. Natural gas as a fuel source is relatively recent. In the UK we're talking later half of the 20th century.

                        artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        artemis@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        artemis@climatejustice.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #106

                        @quixoticgeek indeed.

                        @wesdym the point of the term 'new'speak is not that it's new, but that like the language in Orwell's novel, it is desceptive and changes how people think.
                        Also, no need to be an asshole about it. I saw what you posted @ me.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                          9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                          Link Preview Image
                          New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                          The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                          favicon

                          Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                          jazone@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jazone@theforkiverse.comJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jazone@theforkiverse.com
                          wrote last edited by
                          #107

                          @quixoticgeek

                          Look at all the roof cooling units. Total waste.

                          Ground temp is an average of 55 degrees (F) at 6-10 foot depth. The entire design would cost more to build geo-thermal but consume less grid energy for cooling.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                            9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                            Link Preview Image
                            New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                            The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                            favicon

                            Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                            pawsplay@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pawsplay@dice.campP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pawsplay@dice.camp
                            wrote last edited by
                            #108

                            @quixoticgeek That's no moon. That's a battle station.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • quixoticgeek@social.v.stQ quixoticgeek@social.v.st

                              9GW datacentre approved. I'm trying to get my head round the scale of this. The whole of the UK uses about 40GW of electricity. So this one facility is a quarter of the UK grid. In one location. I had to look up box elder county on Wikipedia. "Its territory includes large tracts of barren desert,". Right, so a datacentre that uses the same amount of electricity as a quarter of the UK. In a fucking desert. And that's before we even consider the CO2 emissions. Yikes.

                              Link Preview Image
                              New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses — Kevin O'Leary's 9 Gigawatt Utah data center campus approved

                              The 40,000-acre project will run entirely off-grid using natural gas.

                              favicon

                              Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)

                              scudo@antani.cyouS This user is from outside of this forum
                              scudo@antani.cyouS This user is from outside of this forum
                              scudo@antani.cyou
                              wrote last edited by
                              #109

                              @quixoticgeek@social.v.st the funny thing is that NOBODY has the money to actually build it, no company in the world has so much money lol

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R relay@relay.publicsquare.global shared this topic
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups