Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. No one is better at keeping hope alive than Rebecca Solnit, the historian and essayist whose *Hope in the Dark* got me through the first Trump administration and whose *A Paradise Built In Hell* inspired my novel *Walkaway*:

No one is better at keeping hope alive than Rebecca Solnit, the historian and essayist whose *Hope in the Dark* got me through the first Trump administration and whose *A Paradise Built In Hell* inspired my novel *Walkaway*:

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
65 Posts 15 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

    Solnit starts by explaining some of the (many, many) things that Trump doesn't understand. Principally, Trump doesn't understand the concept of "demand destruction," which is what happens when shortages prompt people to make durable, one-way changes in their behavior that permanently reduce the demand for fossil fuels.

    3/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
    pluralistic@mamot.fr
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    High prices sometimes create demand destruction: for example, if a transient shortage in eggs pushes prices up, people might discover that they prefer tofu scrambles in the morning, so even when the price of eggs comes back down, they buy two dozen fewer eggs every month, forever.

    4/

    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

      High prices sometimes create demand destruction: for example, if a transient shortage in eggs pushes prices up, people might discover that they prefer tofu scrambles in the morning, so even when the price of eggs comes back down, they buy two dozen fewer eggs every month, forever.

      4/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
      pluralistic@mamot.fr
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      Beyond high prices, shortages and rationing are *far* more likely to lead to demand destruction. In the 10 years following the 1970s oil crisis, US cars doubled in fuel efficiency, and the gas-guzzler didn't return until car manufacturers exploited the American "light truck" loophole to fill the streets with deadly SUVs:

      Just a moment...

      favicon

      (medium.com)

      5/

      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

        Beyond high prices, shortages and rationing are *far* more likely to lead to demand destruction. In the 10 years following the 1970s oil crisis, US cars doubled in fuel efficiency, and the gas-guzzler didn't return until car manufacturers exploited the American "light truck" loophole to fill the streets with deadly SUVs:

        Just a moment...

        favicon

        (medium.com)

        5/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
        pluralistic@mamot.fr
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        But to *really* max out on demand destruction, you need *both* rationing *and* a cheap, easily installed substitute, and that's what the Strait of Epstein crisis, along with solar and batteries, offers the world today. Solar is *incredibly* cheap, and getting cheaper every day. Batteries are *also* incredibly cheap, and they're getting cheaper too.

        6/

        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

          But to *really* max out on demand destruction, you need *both* rationing *and* a cheap, easily installed substitute, and that's what the Strait of Epstein crisis, along with solar and batteries, offers the world today. Solar is *incredibly* cheap, and getting cheaper every day. Batteries are *also* incredibly cheap, and they're getting cheaper too.

          6/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
          pluralistic@mamot.fr
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          For decades, fossil fuel apologists have insisted that we'll never stop setting old dead shit on fire because "the sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow," but thanks to battery deployment in China and California (and more places very soon), the sun shines all night long:

          https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2026/04/Global-Electricity-Review-2026.pdf?ref=meditationsinanemergency.com

          7/

          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

            For decades, fossil fuel apologists have insisted that we'll never stop setting old dead shit on fire because "the sun doesn't always shine and the wind doesn't always blow," but thanks to battery deployment in China and California (and more places very soon), the sun shines all night long:

            https://ember-energy.org/app/uploads/2026/04/Global-Electricity-Review-2026.pdf?ref=meditationsinanemergency.com

            7/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
            pluralistic@mamot.fr
            wrote last edited by
            #8

            In starting this stupid, unforgivable war, Trump has *vastly* accelerated the process of demand destruction. Rather than buying American oil, the whole world has undertaken a simultaneous, rapid, irreversible shift to electrical substitutes for fossil fuel applications, from induction tops to balcony solar to ebikes and EVs:

            Link Preview Image
            01 | Demand Destruction | US oil is not winning the Iran war

            Did they really think it would?

            favicon

            The Polycrisis (thepolycrisis.org)

            8/

            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

              In starting this stupid, unforgivable war, Trump has *vastly* accelerated the process of demand destruction. Rather than buying American oil, the whole world has undertaken a simultaneous, rapid, irreversible shift to electrical substitutes for fossil fuel applications, from induction tops to balcony solar to ebikes and EVs:

              Link Preview Image
              01 | Demand Destruction | US oil is not winning the Iran war

              Did they really think it would?

              favicon

              The Polycrisis (thepolycrisis.org)

              8/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
              pluralistic@mamot.fr
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              As Solnit writes, Trump's stupid war follows on the heels of another unforgivable, cruel blunder: Putin's quagmire in Ukraine, which catapulted Europe into the Gretacene, with a wholesale, continent-wide shift away from fossil fuels to renewables and the devices they power. Now, the rest of the world is following suit. In South Korea, President Lee Jae Myung is leading the charge to transition the country to renewables, framing fossil fuels as an existential geopolitical risk.

              9/

              pluralistic@mamot.frP clayfoot@mastodon.socialC 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                As Solnit writes, Trump's stupid war follows on the heels of another unforgivable, cruel blunder: Putin's quagmire in Ukraine, which catapulted Europe into the Gretacene, with a wholesale, continent-wide shift away from fossil fuels to renewables and the devices they power. Now, the rest of the world is following suit. In South Korea, President Lee Jae Myung is leading the charge to transition the country to renewables, framing fossil fuels as an existential geopolitical risk.

                9/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                Trump's demand destruction accelerates Putin's demand destruction: China and India both increased their energy consumption in 2025 - but *reduced* their fossil fuel consumption over the same period. In 2025, coal accounted for less than a third of the world's energy for the first time in modern history. 2025 was the year that solar and wind overtook coal globally.

                Meanwhile, Trump and his oil baron buddies keep trying to make fetch happen.

                10/

                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                0
                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                  Trump's demand destruction accelerates Putin's demand destruction: China and India both increased their energy consumption in 2025 - but *reduced* their fossil fuel consumption over the same period. In 2025, coal accounted for less than a third of the world's energy for the first time in modern history. 2025 was the year that solar and wind overtook coal globally.

                  Meanwhile, Trump and his oil baron buddies keep trying to make fetch happen.

                  10/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  On the campaign trail, Trump told the oil industry that if they slipped him a $1b bribe, he'd give them anything. He's kept his promise. Trump will let Big Oil drill anywhere they like, from sacred sites like New Mexico's Chaco Canyon to the Arctic. He'll even let them take all of Venezuela's oil. The problem is that banks can see the demand destruction writing on the wall, and they are conspicuously declining to loan the oil companies the money they'd need to get that oil.

                  11/

                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                    On the campaign trail, Trump told the oil industry that if they slipped him a $1b bribe, he'd give them anything. He's kept his promise. Trump will let Big Oil drill anywhere they like, from sacred sites like New Mexico's Chaco Canyon to the Arctic. He'll even let them take all of Venezuela's oil. The problem is that banks can see the demand destruction writing on the wall, and they are conspicuously declining to loan the oil companies the money they'd need to get that oil.

                    11/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    Truly, Trump's a machine for creating stranded assets at scale. As Solnit writes, that's because Trump has no strategic foresight; strategy being "the ability to plan for things to arise that may counter your agenda, so you can continue to pursue your agenda." Trump's a bully, and he's accustomed to intimidating his adversaries into capitulating. That's why Trump keeps making moves without ever thinking about the countermove he might provoke.

                    12/

                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                      Truly, Trump's a machine for creating stranded assets at scale. As Solnit writes, that's because Trump has no strategic foresight; strategy being "the ability to plan for things to arise that may counter your agenda, so you can continue to pursue your agenda." Trump's a bully, and he's accustomed to intimidating his adversaries into capitulating. That's why Trump keeps making moves without ever thinking about the countermove he might provoke.

                      12/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      He can't metabolize the strategic maxim that "the enemy gets a vote."

                      This is the GOP's whole vibe these days: "how dare you do unto me as I have done unto you?" Solnit points to GOP outrage in response to Democratic gerrymandering in blue states, which Democrats undertook in direct, explicit response to shameless gerrymandering in Texas and other red states. Solnit says that the GOP has "confused having a lot of power with having all the power."

                      13/

                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                        He can't metabolize the strategic maxim that "the enemy gets a vote."

                        This is the GOP's whole vibe these days: "how dare you do unto me as I have done unto you?" Solnit points to GOP outrage in response to Democratic gerrymandering in blue states, which Democrats undertook in direct, explicit response to shameless gerrymandering in Texas and other red states. Solnit says that the GOP has "confused having a lot of power with having all the power."

                        13/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                        wrote last edited by
                        #14

                        They are perennially surprised when their attacks on Iran and Minneapolis evince a reaction from the people in Iran and Minneapolis.

                        This is the defective reasoning that caused Comrade Trump to hormuz the world into the full Gretacene.

                        14/

                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                          They are perennially surprised when their attacks on Iran and Minneapolis evince a reaction from the people in Iran and Minneapolis.

                          This is the defective reasoning that caused Comrade Trump to hormuz the world into the full Gretacene.

                          14/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                          wrote last edited by
                          #15

                          Whereas once the case for the energy transition was driven by activists who warned people about the *future* consequences of inaction, Trump has summoned up a new army of people who are worried about the *present* consequences of inaction: such as not being able to drive your car, use your gas stove, or fertilize your crops.

                          15/

                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                            Whereas once the case for the energy transition was driven by activists who warned people about the *future* consequences of inaction, Trump has summoned up a new army of people who are worried about the *present* consequences of inaction: such as not being able to drive your car, use your gas stove, or fertilize your crops.

                            15/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pluralistic@mamot.fr
                            wrote last edited by
                            #16

                            Trump has summoned up *another* army of people, who are worried about the *politics* of oil, the fact that oil leads to wars and can be mobilized as a weapon when it is withheld from your country.

                            16/

                            pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                              Trump has summoned up *another* army of people, who are worried about the *politics* of oil, the fact that oil leads to wars and can be mobilized as a weapon when it is withheld from your country.

                              16/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                              pluralistic@mamot.fr
                              wrote last edited by
                              #17

                              Activists couldn't deliver the energy transition on their own - but now there's a coalition that's driving rapid, irreversible change: activists concerned about the future of the planet, in coalition with economic actors concerned about the consequences of not being able to cook, heat your home, or keep the lights on; in coalition with national security hawks worried about the geopolitics of oil.

                              17/

                              pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                Activists couldn't deliver the energy transition on their own - but now there's a coalition that's driving rapid, irreversible change: activists concerned about the future of the planet, in coalition with economic actors concerned about the consequences of not being able to cook, heat your home, or keep the lights on; in coalition with national security hawks worried about the geopolitics of oil.

                                17/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                wrote last edited by
                                #18

                                That's Comrade Trump's three-part mobilization: human rights, finance, and national security, all insisting that the enemy gets a vote, and voting unanimously for a post-American world.

                                Last week marked the first Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels conference, attended by representatives from 54 countries who sidestepped the US- and China-dominated UN to ratify the Fossil Fuel Nonproliferation Treaty Initiative, whose 18 signatories include Colombia, a major oil producer.

                                18/

                                pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                  That's Comrade Trump's three-part mobilization: human rights, finance, and national security, all insisting that the enemy gets a vote, and voting unanimously for a post-American world.

                                  Last week marked the first Transitioning Away from Fossil Fuels conference, attended by representatives from 54 countries who sidestepped the US- and China-dominated UN to ratify the Fossil Fuel Nonproliferation Treaty Initiative, whose 18 signatories include Colombia, a major oil producer.

                                  18/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #19

                                  The world is moving on, and Trump continues to insist that he can roll back history to some imaginary era of a Great America. Every time this fails, he doubles down on his failures and sets the stage for more failure to come. Take Trump's decision to have the US blockade the Strait of Hormuz. Not only is this a powerful force for demand destruction - but, as Trita Parsi writes, it's also poison for Trump's own electoral fortunes in America:

                                  Link Preview Image
                                  Trump’s Iran blockade snatches defeat from the jaws of victory

                                  Washington's search for a 'silver bullet' to defeat Tehran has made it all but impossible to secure a deal

                                  favicon

                                  Responsible Statecraft (responsiblestatecraft.org)

                                  19/

                                  pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                    The world is moving on, and Trump continues to insist that he can roll back history to some imaginary era of a Great America. Every time this fails, he doubles down on his failures and sets the stage for more failure to come. Take Trump's decision to have the US blockade the Strait of Hormuz. Not only is this a powerful force for demand destruction - but, as Trita Parsi writes, it's also poison for Trump's own electoral fortunes in America:

                                    Link Preview Image
                                    Trump’s Iran blockade snatches defeat from the jaws of victory

                                    Washington's search for a 'silver bullet' to defeat Tehran has made it all but impossible to secure a deal

                                    favicon

                                    Responsible Statecraft (responsiblestatecraft.org)

                                    19/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #20

                                    Trump won in 2024 by campaigning to improve Americans' cost of living. This is a powerful campaign strategy, and it's not limited to fascists, as Zohran Mamdani can attest. But for this to work, you actually have to reduce the cost of living once you take office, otherwise you will be hated and rejected and hampered in everything you do.

                                    20/

                                    pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                      Trump won in 2024 by campaigning to improve Americans' cost of living. This is a powerful campaign strategy, and it's not limited to fascists, as Zohran Mamdani can attest. But for this to work, you actually have to reduce the cost of living once you take office, otherwise you will be hated and rejected and hampered in everything you do.

                                      20/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #21

                                      The problem (for Trump - but not for Mamdani!) is that America's high cost of living is driven by corporate profiteering, and the only way to fix it is to make the rich poorer so as to make the poor richer:

                                      Link Preview Image
                                      Pluralistic: Socialist excellence in New York City (24 Feb 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                                      favicon

                                      (pluralistic.net)

                                      21/

                                      pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                        The problem (for Trump - but not for Mamdani!) is that America's high cost of living is driven by corporate profiteering, and the only way to fix it is to make the rich poorer so as to make the poor richer:

                                        Link Preview Image
                                        Pluralistic: Socialist excellence in New York City (24 Feb 2026) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

                                        favicon

                                        (pluralistic.net)

                                        21/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #22

                                        If Trump had chosen to bullshit his way through the Iranian blockade of the strait, allowing the Iranians to collect a $2m toll per tanker (payable in Chinese renminbi!), well, oil would have gone up in price some, but the coming runaway inflation on food and fuel would have been substantially blunted.

                                        22/

                                        pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pluralistic@mamot.frP pluralistic@mamot.fr

                                          If Trump had chosen to bullshit his way through the Iranian blockade of the strait, allowing the Iranians to collect a $2m toll per tanker (payable in Chinese renminbi!), well, oil would have gone up in price some, but the coming runaway inflation on food and fuel would have been substantially blunted.

                                          22/

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pluralistic@mamot.fr
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #23

                                          Instead, he decided to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory" by adding a US blockade, which means that prices in the US are going to skyrocket, making his base furious and driving turnout for Democrats, along with support for more renewables, even among blood-red Republican rural Texas ranchers, who have had enough of "DEI for fossil fuels":

                                          Link Preview Image
                                          Renewables are now the ‘Costco’ of energy production, Bill McKibben says

                                          Austin Sierra Club hosted a virtual conversation on May 6 with climate activist Bill McKibben on the current state of environmental affairs.

                                          favicon

                                          Austin Free Press (austinfreepress.org)

                                          23/

                                          pluralistic@mamot.frP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups