Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I received the amended Colorado Age Attestation bill.

I received the amended Colorado Age Attestation bill.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
50 Posts 28 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jzb@hachyderm.ioJ jzb@hachyderm.io

    @carlrichell @neal I'm assuming you've seen that this has gone national? Any activity there?

    Are you working with @eff on any of this? I hope they're also poking about here.

    carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
    carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC This user is from outside of this forum
    carlrichell@fosstodon.org
    wrote last edited by
    #37

    @jzb @neal @eff I did catch that and it's one of the more draconian efforts with full verification. I don't expect it to go far but it is scary. Companies that provide verification services are pushing these laws.

    There is apparently a group of open source projects starting to coordinate. I heard this from the FreeBSD Director and am supposed to receive an invite soon. I don't know who is involved yet.

    Other projects like RockyLinux have reached out as well as others.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC carlrichell@fosstodon.org

      I received the amended Colorado Age Attestation bill.

      * Open source OS's and apps are excluded
      * Code repos are excluded (github/gitlab)
      * Containers are excluded (docker/podman)

      I testify Thursday and can use your help! I need your stories about incredible things kids have made thanks to access to open source software. Share here or DM me.

      swee@mastodon.swee.codesS This user is from outside of this forum
      swee@mastodon.swee.codesS This user is from outside of this forum
      swee@mastodon.swee.codes
      wrote last edited by
      #38

      @carlrichell This is going to be a bit long..

      Heya, hopefully me counts, but am is 15 years old and me has used lin ucks since like uhh age 11 (mom introduced me to Zorin OS, and I explored more to Linux), me was already interested in programming and breaking software since age 9 and open source software helped me even more with that with good documentation and community.

      When I was 13 close to 14 I discovered IRC (with Libera.Chat), and that changed my whole life and it also became my comfort zone on the internet, the people there also inspired me to get a domain (https://swee.codes) and i also became a furry after using IRC :3

      IRC also inspired me to start self hosting stuff, I currently selfhost a ZNC with 128 users (and also seen in https://wiki.znc.in/Providers), and some others listed on https://swee.codes/services

      oh and not to mention the many projects on my self-hosted git site - https://git.swee.codes/swee just has 63 public repos, not that much /s

      I've lost interest in looking at Linux distros and became more interested in exploring more unixes, my home server runs FreeBSD (https://oreo.node.swee.codes) and I've also tried Haiku and SerenityOS

      At least I'm not an idiot that searches "how to convert .bat to .exe" and uses Scratch anymore, thanks to open source software. :3

      I really hope Washington doesn't copy California and Colorado, and that we find a way to fight for anonymity

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • qbit@mammothcirc.usQ qbit@mammothcirc.us

        @carlrichell can we just not pass the bill? Is that even considered?

        vandorb12@infosec.exchangeV This user is from outside of this forum
        vandorb12@infosec.exchangeV This user is from outside of this forum
        vandorb12@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #39

        @qbit @carlrichell can we honestly expect politicians to do the right thing?

        qbit@mammothcirc.usQ 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC carlrichell@fosstodon.org

          I received the amended Colorado Age Attestation bill.

          * Open source OS's and apps are excluded
          * Code repos are excluded (github/gitlab)
          * Containers are excluded (docker/podman)

          I testify Thursday and can use your help! I need your stories about incredible things kids have made thanks to access to open source software. Share here or DM me.

          dgr@toot.liD This user is from outside of this forum
          dgr@toot.liD This user is from outside of this forum
          dgr@toot.li
          wrote last edited by
          #40

          @carlrichell I would like to have the feature to enable parental control on my Linux for my kids but I'm not happy with the laws. I would like the law to require sites and apps that want kids as users/customers to be required to provide a PEGI like signal. This way I control if I enable the feature on my machine and the OS and the browser does the checking if the user can launch the app or open the site.
          Also distributions could add the PEGI class to the packages in their repos.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC carlrichell@fosstodon.org

            I received the amended Colorado Age Attestation bill.

            * Open source OS's and apps are excluded
            * Code repos are excluded (github/gitlab)
            * Containers are excluded (docker/podman)

            I testify Thursday and can use your help! I need your stories about incredible things kids have made thanks to access to open source software. Share here or DM me.

            gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
            gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social
            wrote last edited by
            #41

            @carlrichell Idea: Challenge those pushing this idea to define operating system in precise technical terms. Do not allow them to use vague, layman definition for operating system. Because I guarantee you they will be conflating "operating system" with "desktop environment' and they are not at all the same thing. OSes exist because monolithic computer programs owning the entire processor was considered unsafe and outdated by 1998 when Apple finally was dragged screaming across the line.

            gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social

              @carlrichell Idea: Challenge those pushing this idea to define operating system in precise technical terms. Do not allow them to use vague, layman definition for operating system. Because I guarantee you they will be conflating "operating system" with "desktop environment' and they are not at all the same thing. OSes exist because monolithic computer programs owning the entire processor was considered unsafe and outdated by 1998 when Apple finally was dragged screaming across the line.

              gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social
              wrote last edited by
              #42

              @carlrichell The entire purpose of modern operating systems is to facilitate multitasking operation by interacting with context switches with the scheduler. When you break down what this means in plain english, the bill becomes "It's illegal to run multiple programs at once without giving your age." Which should be nakedly obvious as to why this isn't accomplishing their stated goals and only hurts non-corporate technologists as a whole.

              gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social

                @carlrichell The entire purpose of modern operating systems is to facilitate multitasking operation by interacting with context switches with the scheduler. When you break down what this means in plain english, the bill becomes "It's illegal to run multiple programs at once without giving your age." Which should be nakedly obvious as to why this isn't accomplishing their stated goals and only hurts non-corporate technologists as a whole.

                gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #43

                @carlrichell I thought law was supposed to be the realm of ultra-precise language for a reason. You can't build a law against a vague vibes definition. The vast amount of normal computer users have no idea what an operating system is despite thinking they do, and I 100% guarantee these lawmakers you speaking of are just as ignorant. If the logical arguments won't hold sway, turn to the argument of the language.

                gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social

                  @carlrichell I thought law was supposed to be the realm of ultra-precise language for a reason. You can't build a law against a vague vibes definition. The vast amount of normal computer users have no idea what an operating system is despite thinking they do, and I 100% guarantee these lawmakers you speaking of are just as ignorant. If the logical arguments won't hold sway, turn to the argument of the language.

                  gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                  gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #44

                  @carlrichell give one final argument: You can very easily write monolithic programs that will do everything they are trying to avoid, without being classified as an OS. And, in fact, those monolithic programs would be harder to regulate because at that point, they simply become programs without any real defining characteristics to isolate them by the language beiung used.

                  gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social

                    @carlrichell give one final argument: You can very easily write monolithic programs that will do everything they are trying to avoid, without being classified as an OS. And, in fact, those monolithic programs would be harder to regulate because at that point, they simply become programs without any real defining characteristics to isolate them by the language beiung used.

                    gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gabemoralesvr@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                    gabemoralesvr@mastodon.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #45

                    @carlrichell Wasn't it just a yearish ago that these same types of lawmakers were trying to pass a built to make using C and C++ illegal for government contracts because they aren't threadsafe? Ask them how this bill is at all in line with their previous attempts at safety. Because this bill would give more utility towards those monolithic programs, thus making them more attractive to use. And monolithic programs are not safe beyond being threadsafe.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • vandorb12@infosec.exchangeV vandorb12@infosec.exchange

                      @qbit @carlrichell can we honestly expect politicians to do the right thing?

                      qbit@mammothcirc.usQ This user is from outside of this forum
                      qbit@mammothcirc.usQ This user is from outside of this forum
                      qbit@mammothcirc.us
                      wrote last edited by
                      #46

                      @vandorb12 @carlrichell we absolutely should! And if they aren't we need to inform them of what and why they are doing wrong!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • vandorb12@infosec.exchangeV vandorb12@infosec.exchange

                        @qbit @carlrichell can we honestly expect politicians to do the right thing?

                        qbit@mammothcirc.usQ This user is from outside of this forum
                        qbit@mammothcirc.usQ This user is from outside of this forum
                        qbit@mammothcirc.us
                        wrote last edited by
                        #47

                        @vandorb12 @carlrichell we absolutely should! And if they aren't we need to inform them of what and why they are doing wrong!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC carlrichell@fosstodon.org

                          I received the amended Colorado Age Attestation bill.

                          * Open source OS's and apps are excluded
                          * Code repos are excluded (github/gitlab)
                          * Containers are excluded (docker/podman)

                          I testify Thursday and can use your help! I need your stories about incredible things kids have made thanks to access to open source software. Share here or DM me.

                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          P This user is from outside of this forum
                          paranormal_distribution@fosstodon.org
                          wrote last edited by
                          #48

                          @carlrichell I learned to use Kivy thanks to some kid (ShawCode) on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChB6no22fVJ-6dGNTfbb05w

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC carlrichell@fosstodon.org

                            I received the amended Colorado Age Attestation bill.

                            * Open source OS's and apps are excluded
                            * Code repos are excluded (github/gitlab)
                            * Containers are excluded (docker/podman)

                            I testify Thursday and can use your help! I need your stories about incredible things kids have made thanks to access to open source software. Share here or DM me.

                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            paranormal_distribution@fosstodon.org
                            wrote last edited by
                            #49

                            @carlrichell if brilliant kids like him can't use open source tools growing up, it's not only a personal tragedy for said kids, but a loss in innovation, competitiveness and tax revenue for the country as a whole

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • carlrichell@fosstodon.orgC carlrichell@fosstodon.org

                              @neal with the way this worked out, I believe we now have a sound template to start working in other states. I haven't found the amended text online but will post as soon I do. Our next step is a letter to the CO reps that we need to pass the bill with these amendments, then adapting that letter to other states and working with the open source community to raise awareness.

                              nateb@mastodon.thenewoil.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nateb@mastodon.thenewoil.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nateb@mastodon.thenewoil.org
                              wrote last edited by
                              #50

                              @carlrichell Respectfully, I disagree with your attitude here. "Now that this doesn't affect us, fuck everyone else on Windows/Mac." This is not gonna be enough to push the masses toward Linux, so all this is doing is putting Mac/Windows users at risk. Furthermore, what happens when Linux becomes a mainstream tool and then lawmakers decide that now they need to expand the law to include open source software?

                              This is very much a "first they came for Windows users" attitude.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups