Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Fuck AI
  3. I'm late to the party, it would seem

I'm late to the party, it would seem

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fuck AI
linuxprogramminglinux kernel
18 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
    cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Sorry for my frequent posts here recently, I don't mean to spam at all, but I'm so mad about this. I heard a few rumors about AI being used in the Linux kernel, but never enough about it to think it was actively happening.
    I switched to Linux last year once I realized I wouldn't be able to switch to Windows 11 without having revolting LLM shit dumped on me, it was one of the biggest reasons I did so because I finally had enough. I moved everything, started using open source programs for everything, got involved in the Fediverse (as you can see), I altered all my creative workflows to use only FLOSS software, down to the individual plugins in my Digital Audio Workstation. It's been a big effort, but I'm happier with my life technologically then I have ever been.
    Now I'm being told that no matter what distro we choose, in some capacity, we are all running/supporting AI slop?

    I can't say this in a way that doesn't sound overly dramatic so I guess I'll just lean into it: how fucking dare they. It's literally the most regressive thing the kernel's devs could do, and it's in the fucking kernel. I can't just switch distros to one that respects me, the environment, etc. It goes against the nature of Linux in and of itself. I genuinely feel betrayed. Wtf do I do and why haven't I seen more pushback against this? istfg it's like nothing is safe anymore. Even most anti-LLM FLOSS projects are too cowardly to say it explicitly. Fuck.

    mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM L A breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB C 5 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social shared this topic
    • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

      Sorry for my frequent posts here recently, I don't mean to spam at all, but I'm so mad about this. I heard a few rumors about AI being used in the Linux kernel, but never enough about it to think it was actively happening.
      I switched to Linux last year once I realized I wouldn't be able to switch to Windows 11 without having revolting LLM shit dumped on me, it was one of the biggest reasons I did so because I finally had enough. I moved everything, started using open source programs for everything, got involved in the Fediverse (as you can see), I altered all my creative workflows to use only FLOSS software, down to the individual plugins in my Digital Audio Workstation. It's been a big effort, but I'm happier with my life technologically then I have ever been.
      Now I'm being told that no matter what distro we choose, in some capacity, we are all running/supporting AI slop?

      I can't say this in a way that doesn't sound overly dramatic so I guess I'll just lean into it: how fucking dare they. It's literally the most regressive thing the kernel's devs could do, and it's in the fucking kernel. I can't just switch distros to one that respects me, the environment, etc. It goes against the nature of Linux in and of itself. I genuinely feel betrayed. Wtf do I do and why haven't I seen more pushback against this? istfg it's like nothing is safe anymore. Even most anti-LLM FLOSS projects are too cowardly to say it explicitly. Fuck.

      mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
      mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @cloudskater I think you'd like my blog post then which goes into this a bit.

      Link Preview Image
      The *BSD Preference - NerdNextDoor's Blog

      favicon

      (nerdnextdoor.net)

      cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

        Sorry for my frequent posts here recently, I don't mean to spam at all, but I'm so mad about this. I heard a few rumors about AI being used in the Linux kernel, but never enough about it to think it was actively happening.
        I switched to Linux last year once I realized I wouldn't be able to switch to Windows 11 without having revolting LLM shit dumped on me, it was one of the biggest reasons I did so because I finally had enough. I moved everything, started using open source programs for everything, got involved in the Fediverse (as you can see), I altered all my creative workflows to use only FLOSS software, down to the individual plugins in my Digital Audio Workstation. It's been a big effort, but I'm happier with my life technologically then I have ever been.
        Now I'm being told that no matter what distro we choose, in some capacity, we are all running/supporting AI slop?

        I can't say this in a way that doesn't sound overly dramatic so I guess I'll just lean into it: how fucking dare they. It's literally the most regressive thing the kernel's devs could do, and it's in the fucking kernel. I can't just switch distros to one that respects me, the environment, etc. It goes against the nature of Linux in and of itself. I genuinely feel betrayed. Wtf do I do and why haven't I seen more pushback against this? istfg it's like nothing is safe anymore. Even most anti-LLM FLOSS projects are too cowardly to say it explicitly. Fuck.

        L This user is from outside of this forum
        L This user is from outside of this forum
        lens_r@mastodon.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @cloudskater hey, we could always make our own OS, with blackjack and hookers.

        On second thought, forget the OS

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

          Sorry for my frequent posts here recently, I don't mean to spam at all, but I'm so mad about this. I heard a few rumors about AI being used in the Linux kernel, but never enough about it to think it was actively happening.
          I switched to Linux last year once I realized I wouldn't be able to switch to Windows 11 without having revolting LLM shit dumped on me, it was one of the biggest reasons I did so because I finally had enough. I moved everything, started using open source programs for everything, got involved in the Fediverse (as you can see), I altered all my creative workflows to use only FLOSS software, down to the individual plugins in my Digital Audio Workstation. It's been a big effort, but I'm happier with my life technologically then I have ever been.
          Now I'm being told that no matter what distro we choose, in some capacity, we are all running/supporting AI slop?

          I can't say this in a way that doesn't sound overly dramatic so I guess I'll just lean into it: how fucking dare they. It's literally the most regressive thing the kernel's devs could do, and it's in the fucking kernel. I can't just switch distros to one that respects me, the environment, etc. It goes against the nature of Linux in and of itself. I genuinely feel betrayed. Wtf do I do and why haven't I seen more pushback against this? istfg it's like nothing is safe anymore. Even most anti-LLM FLOSS projects are too cowardly to say it explicitly. Fuck.

          A This user is from outside of this forum
          A This user is from outside of this forum
          atrielienz@lemmy.world
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Could you link to an article or a write up on the stuff you're referencing so I can look into it more, please?

          cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

            Sorry for my frequent posts here recently, I don't mean to spam at all, but I'm so mad about this. I heard a few rumors about AI being used in the Linux kernel, but never enough about it to think it was actively happening.
            I switched to Linux last year once I realized I wouldn't be able to switch to Windows 11 without having revolting LLM shit dumped on me, it was one of the biggest reasons I did so because I finally had enough. I moved everything, started using open source programs for everything, got involved in the Fediverse (as you can see), I altered all my creative workflows to use only FLOSS software, down to the individual plugins in my Digital Audio Workstation. It's been a big effort, but I'm happier with my life technologically then I have ever been.
            Now I'm being told that no matter what distro we choose, in some capacity, we are all running/supporting AI slop?

            I can't say this in a way that doesn't sound overly dramatic so I guess I'll just lean into it: how fucking dare they. It's literally the most regressive thing the kernel's devs could do, and it's in the fucking kernel. I can't just switch distros to one that respects me, the environment, etc. It goes against the nature of Linux in and of itself. I genuinely feel betrayed. Wtf do I do and why haven't I seen more pushback against this? istfg it's like nothing is safe anymore. Even most anti-LLM FLOSS projects are too cowardly to say it explicitly. Fuck.

            breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
            breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
            breadsmasher@lemmy.world
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Where have you seen LLM generated code being merged into the kernel?

            cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social

              @cloudskater I think you'd like my blog post then which goes into this a bit.

              Link Preview Image
              The *BSD Preference - NerdNextDoor's Blog

              favicon

              (nerdnextdoor.net)

              cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
              cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
              cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              I read it and found this very interesting, thank you for making me aware of BSD. You have to understand, though, that changing everything about how the tech in my life works again is a very hard sell. I'm only just now getting my phone running an OS that's not Android, I can only move and learn so fast. Not to mention if I switch to a totally different OS down to the kernel, I'll lose all the FLOSS programs I've learned in that time like Ardour, Kdenlive, even emulators like BizHawk and Duckstation.
              It's not a coincidence that I also made a post recently asking about the issues with Rust. It feels like every hour I've spent trying to make better choices and learning the ropes of more trustworthy and community driven software has been completely fucking wasted...

              mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

                I read it and found this very interesting, thank you for making me aware of BSD. You have to understand, though, that changing everything about how the tech in my life works again is a very hard sell. I'm only just now getting my phone running an OS that's not Android, I can only move and learn so fast. Not to mention if I switch to a totally different OS down to the kernel, I'll lose all the FLOSS programs I've learned in that time like Ardour, Kdenlive, even emulators like BizHawk and Duckstation.
                It's not a coincidence that I also made a post recently asking about the issues with Rust. It feels like every hour I've spent trying to make better choices and learning the ropes of more trustworthy and community driven software has been completely fucking wasted...

                mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @cloudskater a lot of Linux stuff can run on FreeBSD as well by the way ;3

                cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

                  Sorry for my frequent posts here recently, I don't mean to spam at all, but I'm so mad about this. I heard a few rumors about AI being used in the Linux kernel, but never enough about it to think it was actively happening.
                  I switched to Linux last year once I realized I wouldn't be able to switch to Windows 11 without having revolting LLM shit dumped on me, it was one of the biggest reasons I did so because I finally had enough. I moved everything, started using open source programs for everything, got involved in the Fediverse (as you can see), I altered all my creative workflows to use only FLOSS software, down to the individual plugins in my Digital Audio Workstation. It's been a big effort, but I'm happier with my life technologically then I have ever been.
                  Now I'm being told that no matter what distro we choose, in some capacity, we are all running/supporting AI slop?

                  I can't say this in a way that doesn't sound overly dramatic so I guess I'll just lean into it: how fucking dare they. It's literally the most regressive thing the kernel's devs could do, and it's in the fucking kernel. I can't just switch distros to one that respects me, the environment, etc. It goes against the nature of Linux in and of itself. I genuinely feel betrayed. Wtf do I do and why haven't I seen more pushback against this? istfg it's like nothing is safe anymore. Even most anti-LLM FLOSS projects are too cowardly to say it explicitly. Fuck.

                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  C This user is from outside of this forum
                  combatwombat@feddit.online
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Here’s an article that discusses llm use on the Linux kernel: https://lwn.net/Articles/1026558/

                  It’s a little older, but it might help to ground the conversation a bit.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB breadsmasher@lemmy.world

                    Where have you seen LLM generated code being merged into the kernel?

                    cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                    cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    Link Preview Image
                    open-slopware

                    open-slopware - Free/Open Source Software tainted by LLM developers/developed by genAI boosters, along with alternatives. Fork of the repo by @gen-ai-transparency after its deletion.

                    favicon

                    Codeberg.org (codeberg.org)

                    breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A atrielienz@lemmy.world

                      Could you link to an article or a write up on the stuff you're referencing so I can look into it more, please?

                      cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                      cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      Link Preview Image
                      open-slopware

                      open-slopware - Free/Open Source Software tainted by LLM developers/developed by genAI boosters, along with alternatives. Fork of the repo by @gen-ai-transparency after its deletion.

                      favicon

                      Codeberg.org (codeberg.org)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

                        Link Preview Image
                        open-slopware

                        open-slopware - Free/Open Source Software tainted by LLM developers/developed by genAI boosters, along with alternatives. Fork of the repo by @gen-ai-transparency after its deletion.

                        favicon

                        Codeberg.org (codeberg.org)

                        breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                        breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                        breadsmasher@lemmy.world
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        Did you read Linus’ response on the mailing list? From that linked article

                        Link Preview Image
                        Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools [LWN.net]

                        favicon

                        (lwn.net)

                        Given his sole control over what gets merged, thats all that matters.

                        also note hes discussing ai as a tool for reviewing patches. nothing about ai actually writing code.

                        make of that what you will

                        I have not yet seen any evidence of actual ai slop code being merged into the kernel

                        cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB breadsmasher@lemmy.world

                          Did you read Linus’ response on the mailing list? From that linked article

                          Link Preview Image
                          Re: [MAINTAINERS / KERNEL SUMMIT] AI patch review tools [LWN.net]

                          favicon

                          (lwn.net)

                          Given his sole control over what gets merged, thats all that matters.

                          also note hes discussing ai as a tool for reviewing patches. nothing about ai actually writing code.

                          make of that what you will

                          I have not yet seen any evidence of actual ai slop code being merged into the kernel

                          cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          Linux, of all projects, should be opposed to these kind of things as a whole. Sure, we could argue it's not as bad, but I'm not comforted by that statement. The fact that those in charge don't see or care about the obvious problems is shocking.

                          breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                            cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            That's not the whole issue.

                            cecilkorik@lemmy.caC 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

                              Linux, of all projects, should be opposed to these kind of things as a whole. Sure, we could argue it's not as bad, but I'm not comforted by that statement. The fact that those in charge don't see or care about the obvious problems is shocking.

                              breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                              breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                              breadsmasher@lemmy.world
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              Im not trying to say one way or the other, or take anyone’s side here.

                              just putting into context “ai generated code in the linux kernel” isnt whats currently happening.

                              unless you have evidence otherwise.

                              edit - KDEs response maybe clarifies “ai” to me in this discussion.

                              We agree and we agree with many of your objections. AI has become a synonym of tech irresponsibility, greed and exploitation, like crypto was before it. The difference is AI existed before the current craze and pursued legitimate goals. That is still happening in some areas of AI research and ignoring all uses of AI would be throwing the baby out with the bath water.

                              LLM providers like OpenAI are scum. But the general technology around “ai” isnt as bad as that

                              cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.socialM mrmasterkeyboard@mastodon.social

                                @cloudskater a lot of Linux stuff can run on FreeBSD as well by the way ;3

                                cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                                cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                That's good news for sure, but this is still a massive slap in the face and even if AI code isn't being injected directly into the kernel, I can't just switch everything around on a dime. I'm sorry if I sound bitchy, but I'm so proud of how much I've learned and I've gushed to people about Linux and open source stuff and how amazing it all is and how it's free from this kind of bullshit. It's especially frustrating since I struggle to grasp all the ins and outs of what this means for Linux, and if it really is this bad I am amazed at the lack of outrage I've heard.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB breadsmasher@lemmy.world

                                  Im not trying to say one way or the other, or take anyone’s side here.

                                  just putting into context “ai generated code in the linux kernel” isnt whats currently happening.

                                  unless you have evidence otherwise.

                                  edit - KDEs response maybe clarifies “ai” to me in this discussion.

                                  We agree and we agree with many of your objections. AI has become a synonym of tech irresponsibility, greed and exploitation, like crypto was before it. The difference is AI existed before the current craze and pursued legitimate goals. That is still happening in some areas of AI research and ignoring all uses of AI would be throwing the baby out with the bath water.

                                  LLM providers like OpenAI are scum. But the general technology around “ai” isnt as bad as that

                                  cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Right. Sorry, I'll try to make the post clearer bc I'm not trying to mislead anyone, I'm just so upset that this is even being entertained by Linux devs, it's boiling my blood.

                                  breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

                                    That's not the whole issue.

                                    cecilkorik@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cecilkorik@lemmy.caC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    It is for most people. You are welcome to create your own issues in life if you wish. But Linus Torvalds is infamous for his meticulous, detailed, thorough, and often expletive-laden code reviews, and if he is willing to review AI-generated or AI-assisted code that's entirely up to him, there is no indication he is willing to lower his coding standards one iota. He trusts his maintainers not to bring him any shitty AI code, but he's giving them the freedom to make that choice themselves. If they abuse it, he will punish them. There's no doubt if you know anything about how the Linux kernel development process works.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zoneC cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone

                                      Right. Sorry, I'll try to make the post clearer bc I'm not trying to mislead anyone, I'm just so upset that this is even being entertained by Linux devs, it's boiling my blood.

                                      breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      breadsmasher@lemmy.worldB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      breadsmasher@lemmy.world
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Just edited my reply for context. Hopefully it explains at least my personal view.

                                      LLMs provided by billionaire techbros? Burn that shit to the ground.

                                      The scientific idea and application of ai when its helpful and relevant I dont see a problem.

                                      The difference being no vibe coded ai generated bullshit ends up in the kernel. The use of this technology elsewhere can be completely fine, if its treated correctly.

                                      But Im totally on your side with “openai llm vibe coded slop should never ever land in the kernel”. And I trust linus on that. given his history with regular 100% human maintainers, he wouldnt let that garbage slide.

                                      “ai” as a term has become synonymous with openai, anthropic, gemini. theyre just LLM products sold by companies. They should never be near real critical production systems. But the wider scientific/technology side could be applied ethically - without using those LLM products

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • World
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups