doing another thingy for wikipedia
-
@maxine lol, MY screen must be shit, because i still see the gradient.
idk if it shows up in this photo i took of it -
@maxine lol, MY screen must be shit, because i still see the gradient.
idk if it shows up in this photo i took of it -
@sand i know@maxine at first i was just eating TV dinners every day, but i got so sick of that it was worth it to start doing some (very) basic cooking to add some variety to my diet.
-
@maxine at first i was just eating TV dinners every day, but i got so sick of that it was worth it to start doing some (very) basic cooking to add some variety to my diet.@sand fat and american
-
@maxine lol, MY screen must be shit, because i still see the gradient.
idk if it shows up in this photo i took of it@sand its bc firefox doesnt do svgs properly -
On displays or renderers that use limited precision or anti-aliasing, very small step changes between colors can become visible as color banding instead of a perfectly smooth fade. Long subtle gradients are more likely to reveal quantization steps, especially in darker tones where the eye is more sensitive to subtle changes. and yes firefox and chrome use different renderers and I hate it
-
On displays or renderers that use limited precision or anti-aliasing, very small step changes between colors can become visible as color banding instead of a perfectly smooth fade. Long subtle gradients are more likely to reveal quantization steps, especially in darker tones where the eye is more sensitive to subtle changes. and yes firefox and chrome use different renderers and I hate it
@rusty__shackleford @maxine yeah, the human eye's sensitivity to changes in different brightnesses of light is logarithmic -- the eye is MUCH more sensitive to differences in dim colors than light ones... apparently so much so we can see the individual shades when the splotches of color are large enough, like this.
i wonder what chrome does differently that allows it to not appear like a stepped gradient. i wonder if it uses dithering. -
@rusty__shackleford @maxine yeah, the human eye's sensitivity to changes in different brightnesses of light is logarithmic -- the eye is MUCH more sensitive to differences in dim colors than light ones... apparently so much so we can see the individual shades when the splotches of color are large enough, like this.
i wonder what chrome does differently that allows it to not appear like a stepped gradient. i wonder if it uses dithering.@rusty__shackleford @maxine max, i like how you chose pink for the iphone svg. -
@rusty__shackleford @maxine max, i like how you chose pink for the iphone svg.@sand @rusty__shackleford the main colour marketed for the iphone 17e is pink
-
@sand @rusty__shackleford the main colour marketed for the iphone 17e is pink@maxine @rusty__shackleford oh damn, iphones for girls
-
@maxine @rusty__shackleford oh damn, iphones for girls@sand @rusty__shackleford there has been always pink coloured iphones lol (since like 2021)
-
@sand @rusty__shackleford there has been always pink coloured iphones lol (since like 2021)@maxine @rusty__shackleford was that when they started having multiple colors?
-
@rusty__shackleford @maxine yeah, the human eye's sensitivity to changes in different brightnesses of light is logarithmic -- the eye is MUCH more sensitive to differences in dim colors than light ones... apparently so much so we can see the individual shades when the splotches of color are large enough, like this.
i wonder what chrome does differently that allows it to not appear like a stepped gradient. i wonder if it uses dithering.@sand @rusty__shackleford nigga is spitting all of this shit out and yet he dropped out of school just to jack off to anime titties -
@maxine @rusty__shackleford was that when they started having multiple colors?@sand @rusty__shackleford uh no thats back in 2015 or smth when the iphone 5 dropped