Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Remember?

Remember?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
googleandroiddevelopercertfi
61 Posts 36 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jwz@mastodon.socialJ jwz@mastodon.social

    @IzzyOnDroid They pioneered this with me a year and a half ago. They locked me out of the "Play" [sic] store and made me unable to update my decade+-old app because I wouldn't give them a lock of my hair. https://jwz.org/b/ykcj

    izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    izzyondroid@floss.social
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    @jwz luckily you know at least two places accepting you and your apps without doxxing you. We don't want your personal data – and I mean that: what we don't have, we cannot loose. We need to know it's really you? OK, there's always GPG & friends ("sign your commits"). But of what interest to us is your private data? 🤷‍♂️ But then, we make no money with our "store". We do not sell ads (or data). We runs things because we love to do stuff with and for the community. Support is of course welcome 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

      Remember? "Sideloading" is here to stay, and won't go away, they said? Don't be afraid, they said? Something something "we heard you"? Suuuure! Who would ever doubt it!

      Attached the copy of a mail developers with apps in the PlayStore CURRENTLY receive. Please, read the text in the red box carefully:

      "Apps not registered by September 2026 WILL NO LONGER BE INSTALLABLE ON CERTIFIED ANDROID DEVICES in select countries."

      See an exception there? I don't.

      #Google #Android #DeveloperCertfication

      interpipes@thx.ggI This user is from outside of this forum
      interpipes@thx.ggI This user is from outside of this forum
      interpipes@thx.gg
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      @IzzyOnDroid @neil Countries that are not the "Select Countries" is where the exception lives. The likely translation here is that consumers in a market without functioning consumer protection bodies / law will be the "Select Countries" where those apps can't be loaded.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        izzyondroid@floss.social
        wrote last edited by
        #27

        @niedlichenacktschnecke Google certified (i.e. "ships with GApps etc"). If you're running a libre ROM without GApps, you're liberated from that.

        dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

          Remember? "Sideloading" is here to stay, and won't go away, they said? Don't be afraid, they said? Something something "we heard you"? Suuuure! Who would ever doubt it!

          Attached the copy of a mail developers with apps in the PlayStore CURRENTLY receive. Please, read the text in the red box carefully:

          "Apps not registered by September 2026 WILL NO LONGER BE INSTALLABLE ON CERTIFIED ANDROID DEVICES in select countries."

          See an exception there? I don't.

          #Google #Android #DeveloperCertfication

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          sir_limpalot@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          @IzzyOnDroid I've been on Android since the beginning, but that ends next time I'm buying a new phone.
          "Don't be evil" silently disappeared ...

          izzyondroid@floss.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • seanking@woem.menS seanking@woem.men

            @IzzyOnDroid@floss.social And because what? They want to have more control over Android akin to how Apple does with iOS? Google's pathetic.

            itseperkele@expressional.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            itseperkele@expressional.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            itseperkele@expressional.social
            wrote last edited by
            #29

            @seanking @IzzyOnDroid

            Because google thinks we are morons. They think that we are not smart enough to use our devices responsibly. They also think we are stupid enough to buy their bullshit excuses.

            landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

              @synnef the thing is: that mail does not even mention the possibility of an "advanced flow" – it simply says "sign or die". As if it has been dropped again.

              synnef@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
              synnef@woof.techS This user is from outside of this forum
              synnef@woof.tech
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              @IzzyOnDroid yeah that's weird, my first assumption is that it's just clever writing to scare developers into signing up for the verification program, because the advanced flow has already been clearly announced and explained

              izzyondroid@floss.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S sir_limpalot@mastodon.social

                @IzzyOnDroid I've been on Android since the beginning, but that ends next time I'm buying a new phone.
                "Don't be evil" silently disappeared ...

                izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                izzyondroid@floss.social
                wrote last edited by
                #31

                @Sir_Limpalot Just the first word disappeared, actually… 🙊 💨

                khleedril@cyberplace.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • synnef@woof.techS synnef@woof.tech

                  @IzzyOnDroid yeah that's weird, my first assumption is that it's just clever writing to scare developers into signing up for the verification program, because the advanced flow has already been clearly announced and explained

                  izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                  izzyondroid@floss.social
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  @synnef If it has been clearly announced and explained, why isn't it even mentioned there in a footnote – but the opposite stated? I'd expect at least a small hint then. Instead, an absolute claim.

                  Honestly: if I bought something, it should be mine – and my decision how I deal with it. I don't need a sugar daddy watching me, and telling me how I should behave. If I want security measures, I want to choose them by my own terms, sorry.

                  numerfolt@kirche.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

                    @Sir_Limpalot Just the first word disappeared, actually… 🙊 💨

                    khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                    khleedril@cyberplace.social
                    wrote last edited by
                    #33

                    @IzzyOnDroid @Sir_Limpalot ... and not silently: they made an announcement when they decided to change their bye-line.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

                      @synnef If it has been clearly announced and explained, why isn't it even mentioned there in a footnote – but the opposite stated? I'd expect at least a small hint then. Instead, an absolute claim.

                      Honestly: if I bought something, it should be mine – and my decision how I deal with it. I don't need a sugar daddy watching me, and telling me how I should behave. If I want security measures, I want to choose them by my own terms, sorry.

                      numerfolt@kirche.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      numerfolt@kirche.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      numerfolt@kirche.social
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34

                      @IzzyOnDroid @synnef They maybe omitted it to push as many developers as possible to do as they're told?

                      And I totally agree with you!

                      izzyondroid@floss.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • numerfolt@kirche.socialN numerfolt@kirche.social

                        @IzzyOnDroid @synnef They maybe omitted it to push as many developers as possible to do as they're told?

                        And I totally agree with you!

                        izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        izzyondroid@floss.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        izzyondroid@floss.social
                        wrote last edited by
                        #35

                        @Numerfolt Maybe they don't reach the "critical mass" fast enough? 🤔

                        numerfolt@kirche.socialN landelare@mastodon.gamedev.placeL 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

                          @Numerfolt Maybe they don't reach the "critical mass" fast enough? 🤔

                          numerfolt@kirche.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          numerfolt@kirche.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                          numerfolt@kirche.social
                          wrote last edited by
                          #36

                          @IzzyOnDroid True, if nobody did that, they couldnt implement it without loosing lots of money. I like the way you think 🙂

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • edybolos@androiddev.socialE edybolos@androiddev.social

                            @ki @IzzyOnDroid doesn't the same ruling still allow apple to require apps to be notarized, even if they are distributed on 3rd party app stores? this is basically the same.

                            sylvielorxu@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sylvielorxu@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            sylvielorxu@chaos.social
                            wrote last edited by
                            #37

                            @EdyBolos @ki @IzzyOnDroid I expect Google to just block "notarizing" for apps they don't like, like Apple recently blocked an app from third party stores, under the argument of "security": https://torrentfreak.com/apple-revokes-eu-distribution-rights-for-torrent-client-developer-left-in-the-dark/

                            edybolos@androiddev.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

                              Remember? "Sideloading" is here to stay, and won't go away, they said? Don't be afraid, they said? Something something "we heard you"? Suuuure! Who would ever doubt it!

                              Attached the copy of a mail developers with apps in the PlayStore CURRENTLY receive. Please, read the text in the red box carefully:

                              "Apps not registered by September 2026 WILL NO LONGER BE INSTALLABLE ON CERTIFIED ANDROID DEVICES in select countries."

                              See an exception there? I don't.

                              #Google #Android #DeveloperCertfication

                              foxes@bark.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                              foxes@bark.lgbtF This user is from outside of this forum
                              foxes@bark.lgbt
                              wrote last edited by
                              #38

                              @IzzyOnDroid "Apps not registered by September 2026 WILL NO LONGER BE INSTALLABLE ON CERTIFIED ANDROID DEVICES in select countries." would probably mean "You'll have to jump through all the hoops with the (for the time being, we'll make it worse down the line "for your safety") one day wait etc. in EU and some other few countries, otherwise fuck you".

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

                                @niedlichenacktschnecke Google certified (i.e. "ships with GApps etc"). If you're running a libre ROM without GApps, you're liberated from that.

                                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dalias@hachyderm.io
                                wrote last edited by
                                #39

                                @IzzyOnDroid @niedlichenacktschnecke Or a liberated ROM with GApps, if you want that.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tillbtc@mastodon.socialT tillbtc@mastodon.social

                                  @IzzyOnDroid There are though.. but I agree this is not ideal at all for an "open" system. Apps will still be installable, whether you sideload or push from pc. There will just be pretty annoying hurdles to go the sideload route. Had me worried there!! My projects app folder was about to be deleted.

                                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dalias@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #40

                                  @tillbtc @IzzyOnDroid The language of that letter suggests that apps will NOT still be installable, even with hurdles, in some countries. The ones they feel like they can get away with it in.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • sylvielorxu@chaos.socialS sylvielorxu@chaos.social

                                    @EdyBolos @ki @IzzyOnDroid I expect Google to just block "notarizing" for apps they don't like, like Apple recently blocked an app from third party stores, under the argument of "security": https://torrentfreak.com/apple-revokes-eu-distribution-rights-for-torrent-client-developer-left-in-the-dark/

                                    edybolos@androiddev.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    edybolos@androiddev.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    edybolos@androiddev.social
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #41

                                    @SylvieLorxu @ki @IzzyOnDroid Yup, or apps that certain governments don't like.

                                    sylvielorxu@chaos.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • edybolos@androiddev.socialE edybolos@androiddev.social

                                      @SylvieLorxu @ki @IzzyOnDroid Yup, or apps that certain governments don't like.

                                      sylvielorxu@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sylvielorxu@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sylvielorxu@chaos.social
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #42

                                      @EdyBolos @ki @IzzyOnDroid Sadly even of that I already have an example ready. When this enforcement becomes OS-based instead of app store based it is game over: https://fortune.com/2025/10/05/why-did-apple-google-remove-iceblock-app-immigration/

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

                                        Remember? "Sideloading" is here to stay, and won't go away, they said? Don't be afraid, they said? Something something "we heard you"? Suuuure! Who would ever doubt it!

                                        Attached the copy of a mail developers with apps in the PlayStore CURRENTLY receive. Please, read the text in the red box carefully:

                                        "Apps not registered by September 2026 WILL NO LONGER BE INSTALLABLE ON CERTIFIED ANDROID DEVICES in select countries."

                                        See an exception there? I don't.

                                        #Google #Android #DeveloperCertfication

                                        andymouse@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        andymouse@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        andymouse@todon.eu
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #43

                                        @IzzyOnDroid Hmm. So I'm on a custom rom, downloading my apps though Fdroid and if not OSS, Aurora store.

                                        Does this impact me?

                                        I'll do keepandroidopen anyway, but just wondering.

                                        theeclecticdyslexic@mstdn.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • izzyondroid@floss.socialI izzyondroid@floss.social

                                          Remember? "Sideloading" is here to stay, and won't go away, they said? Don't be afraid, they said? Something something "we heard you"? Suuuure! Who would ever doubt it!

                                          Attached the copy of a mail developers with apps in the PlayStore CURRENTLY receive. Please, read the text in the red box carefully:

                                          "Apps not registered by September 2026 WILL NO LONGER BE INSTALLABLE ON CERTIFIED ANDROID DEVICES in select countries."

                                          See an exception there? I don't.

                                          #Google #Android #DeveloperCertfication

                                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          L This user is from outside of this forum
                                          luc0x61@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #44

                                          @IzzyOnDroid At some point, as it's happening with operating systems, someone at a national or European level, should say stop it. Should say fine, any phone not open to users' will has to cease to exist on our territory. Any public administration has to be forbidden developing applications that don't run at least on a tertiary open system.
                                          Note that in the large numbers Europe relies for _any_ comms on two (2) US oligarchs.
                                          I fear I will not witness anything changing for the rest of my life.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups