Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
9 Posts 6 Posters 13 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jgbird@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jgbird@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jgbird@mas.to
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

    Link Preview Image
    jgbird@mas.toJ rpmik@avgeek.socialR riaresists@mastodon.socialR rye@kind.socialR punishmenthurts@autistics.lifeP 5 Replies Last reply
    2
    0
    • jgbird@mas.toJ jgbird@mas.to

      I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

      Link Preview Image
      jgbird@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jgbird@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jgbird@mas.to
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      The auto ISO went to 4000, could clean it up pretty easily with a denoise filter. Or just use a reasonable shutter speed!

      dannotdaniel@hellions.cloudD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jgbird@mas.toJ jgbird@mas.to

        I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

        Link Preview Image
        rpmik@avgeek.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rpmik@avgeek.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        rpmik@avgeek.social
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @Jgbird I’ve heard an ND filter is useful in those situations but I don’t have one to try. Your photo looks great to me!

        jgbird@mas.toJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R relay@relay.an.exchange shared this topic
        • jgbird@mas.toJ jgbird@mas.to

          I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

          Link Preview Image
          riaresists@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          riaresists@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          riaresists@mastodon.social
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @Jgbird Wow! Beautiful.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • rpmik@avgeek.socialR rpmik@avgeek.social

            @Jgbird I’ve heard an ND filter is useful in those situations but I don’t have one to try. Your photo looks great to me!

            jgbird@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jgbird@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jgbird@mas.to
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            @rpmik I’ve used a circular polarizer for things in water like rays and fish, and I had an ND filter for landscape, but never did much real landscape. The thread diameter of the zoom lens is 93mm though so I figure a filter that size would be more than I’d want to spend!

            rpmik@avgeek.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jgbird@mas.toJ jgbird@mas.to

              @rpmik I’ve used a circular polarizer for things in water like rays and fish, and I had an ND filter for landscape, but never did much real landscape. The thread diameter of the zoom lens is 93mm though so I figure a filter that size would be more than I’d want to spend!

              rpmik@avgeek.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rpmik@avgeek.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
              rpmik@avgeek.social
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              @Jgbird oh, yeah! No doubt it’d cost a small fortune! Probably wouldn’t get much actual use. Usually too much light with a zoom is far from a problem

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jgbird@mas.toJ jgbird@mas.to

                I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

                Link Preview Image
                rye@kind.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rye@kind.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                rye@kind.social
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @Jgbird what a cool bird!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jgbird@mas.toJ jgbird@mas.to

                  I usually do flying hummingbirds at 1250 or 2000 but it was bright af so I bumped it up to 1/8000

                  Link Preview Image
                  punishmenthurts@autistics.lifeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  punishmenthurts@autistics.lifeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  punishmenthurts@autistics.life
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @Jgbird @12thRITS wow

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jgbird@mas.toJ jgbird@mas.to

                    The auto ISO went to 4000, could clean it up pretty easily with a denoise filter. Or just use a reasonable shutter speed!

                    dannotdaniel@hellions.cloudD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dannotdaniel@hellions.cloudD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dannotdaniel@hellions.cloud
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    @Jgbird awww 4000 isn't that high 😅 as someone with reasonably priced glass...

                    When I'm zoomed in with the teleconverter we're talking about f/9 wide open, so... yeah... I try to keep the ISO down with the shutter but you can't argue with this result - awesome shot!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchangeE em0nm4stodon@infosec.exchange shared this topic
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • World
                    • Users
                    • Groups