Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. There's apparently another Linux LPE

There's apparently another Linux LPE

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
5 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
    wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
    wdormann@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    There's apparently another Linux LPE.
    DirtyDecrypt, also known as DirtyCBC, is a variant of CopyFail / DirtyFrag / Fragnesia.
    I suspect it may be CVE-2026-31635.

    I have not been able to get it to actually work on any Linux distro that I've tried.

    Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
    decio@infosec.exchangeD wdormann@infosec.exchangeW studiolo_rb@mastodon.onlineS 3 Replies Last reply
    1
    0
    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange shared this topic
    • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

      There's apparently another Linux LPE.
      DirtyDecrypt, also known as DirtyCBC, is a variant of CopyFail / DirtyFrag / Fragnesia.
      I suspect it may be CVE-2026-31635.

      I have not been able to get it to actually work on any Linux distro that I've tried.

      Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
      decio@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      decio@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
      decio@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      @wdormann Confirmed same experience on recent distros.

      Apparently the trick is it needs CONFIG_RXGK compiled in, which most distros don't ship.
      Kernel 6.8 on Ubuntu 24.04? Nothing.

      But on mainline kernel 7.0.0 it works (slow but solid):
      96/96 bytes ✅ whoami → root 🎉

      Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

        There's apparently another Linux LPE.
        DirtyDecrypt, also known as DirtyCBC, is a variant of CopyFail / DirtyFrag / Fragnesia.
        I suspect it may be CVE-2026-31635.

        I have not been able to get it to actually work on any Linux distro that I've tried.

        Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
        wdormann@infosec.exchange
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Apparently exploitation requires CONFIG_RXGK, which most distros don't ship

        Except for Fedora.
        Or another distro that is running the mainline Linux kernel.

        Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
        wdormann@infosec.exchangeW 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

          There's apparently another Linux LPE.
          DirtyDecrypt, also known as DirtyCBC, is a variant of CopyFail / DirtyFrag / Fragnesia.
          I suspect it may be CVE-2026-31635.

          I have not been able to get it to actually work on any Linux distro that I've tried.

          Link Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview ImageLink Preview Image
          studiolo_rb@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
          studiolo_rb@mastodon.onlineS This user is from outside of this forum
          studiolo_rb@mastodon.online
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          @wdormann And there I was, hoping for a relaxed week 😩

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • wdormann@infosec.exchangeW wdormann@infosec.exchange

            Apparently exploitation requires CONFIG_RXGK, which most distros don't ship

            Except for Fedora.
            Or another distro that is running the mainline Linux kernel.

            Link Preview ImageLink Preview Image
            wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            wdormann@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            wdormann@infosec.exchange
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Also, the Dirty frag mitigation protects against this variant as well:

            sh -c "printf 'install esp4 /bin/false\ninstall esp6 /bin/false\ninstall rxrpc /bin/false\n' > /etc/modprobe.d/dirtyfrag.conf; rmmod esp4 esp6 rxrpc 2>/dev/null; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; true"
            Link Preview Image
            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            0
            • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups