Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Cyborg)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

CIRCLE WITH A DOT

  1. Home
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Austrailia's early 2000s experiment with a #SharedServices organization is super interesting.

Austrailia's early 2000s experiment with a #SharedServices organization is super interesting.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized
centralizationgcdigitalsharedservices
2 Posts 1 Posters 3 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • sleepycat@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
    sleepycat@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
    sleepycat@infosec.exchange
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Austrailia's early 2000s experiment with a #SharedServices organization is super interesting.

    Super impressed that they actually checked that their #centralization effort was delivering on it's claims.... and it wasn't.

    The original business case was "fundamentally flawed" and has "resulted in a total cost to the State of $473 million" instead of the expected savings of $68 million/year.

    * 91 per cent of sampled agencies comment that service delivery has deteriorated upon transitioning to shared
    services.
    * Over 80 per cent of the sampled agencies reported that processing timeframes have worsened
    * rolling-in to the DTFSSC has had a detrimental impact on the operations of the majority of rolled-in agencies

    "The Authority concludes that the current structure of the DTFSSC is problematic. It is a monopoly provider, with a mandated client base and a lack of meaningful service level agreements. This means that there are minimal incentives for DTFSSC to improve service delivery and few ways in which client agencies can hold DTFSSC accountable"

    #gcdigital

    https://www.erawa.com.au/sites/default/files/Final%20Report%20-%20Inquiry%20into%20the%20Benefits%20and%20Costs%20Associated%20with%20the%20Provision%20of%20Shared%20Corporate%20Services%20in%20the%20Public%20Sector%20-%2010%20June%202011.PDF

    sleepycat@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • sleepycat@infosec.exchangeS sleepycat@infosec.exchange

      Austrailia's early 2000s experiment with a #SharedServices organization is super interesting.

      Super impressed that they actually checked that their #centralization effort was delivering on it's claims.... and it wasn't.

      The original business case was "fundamentally flawed" and has "resulted in a total cost to the State of $473 million" instead of the expected savings of $68 million/year.

      * 91 per cent of sampled agencies comment that service delivery has deteriorated upon transitioning to shared
      services.
      * Over 80 per cent of the sampled agencies reported that processing timeframes have worsened
      * rolling-in to the DTFSSC has had a detrimental impact on the operations of the majority of rolled-in agencies

      "The Authority concludes that the current structure of the DTFSSC is problematic. It is a monopoly provider, with a mandated client base and a lack of meaningful service level agreements. This means that there are minimal incentives for DTFSSC to improve service delivery and few ways in which client agencies can hold DTFSSC accountable"

      #gcdigital

      https://www.erawa.com.au/sites/default/files/Final%20Report%20-%20Inquiry%20into%20the%20Benefits%20and%20Costs%20Associated%20with%20the%20Provision%20of%20Shared%20Corporate%20Services%20in%20the%20Public%20Sector%20-%2010%20June%202011.PDF

      sleepycat@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
      sleepycat@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
      sleepycat@infosec.exchange
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Meanwhile in the UK:

      "The government’s previous shared services strategies failed to deliver their intended cost savings and other benefits. Its new Shared Services Strategy is highly ambitious..."

      #gcdigital #sharedservices

      Link Preview Image
      Government Shared Services - NAO report

      The Government has made progress delivering its latest strategy to share back-office services across Whitehall departments in the past year, but remaining barriers will need to be addressed for it to deliver its plans by 2028 and achieve value for money, according to the National Audit Office.

      favicon

      National Audit Office (NAO) (www.nao.org.uk)

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups