Hot take on the Rust LLM discussion, having actually read the policy:

[ryanc@infosec.exchange]

Hot take on the Rust LLM discussion, having actually read the policy:

The "no ethical/licensing arguments" thing seems like "we want to discuss other things, and ethical/licensing arguments, which we've had elsewhere, would otherwise dominate", which I think is fair, though a better solution would have been to create a separate issue/thread for that.

Also, having run CTFs (and annoyed that LLMs have ruined them), rules that cannot be meaningfully enforced need to be used very, very sparingly.