Contrary to popular belife, a terabyte is actually defined as 1,048,575,000,000 bytes.
-
Contrary to popular belife, a terabyte is actually defined as 1,048,575,000,000 bytes.
-
Contrary to popular belife, a terabyte is actually defined as 1,048,575,000,000 bytes.
@ryanc Imperial Units, but the empire is Western Digital
-
Contrary to popular belife, a terabyte is actually defined as 1,048,575,000,000 bytes.
@ryanc A pterabyte flies high across the valley.
Do you:
-
Contrary to popular belife, a terabyte is actually defined as 1,048,575,000,000 bytes.
@ryanc no way
-
Contrary to popular belife, a terabyte is actually defined as 1,048,575,000,000 bytes.
@ryanc Depends on which definition you choose.
Marketers would accept 1000^4 and up, I'd expect 1024^4 bytes. Yours is a hybrid between the two, but either way I think you meant to say 1,048,576,000,000.
Then the whole mess of do you count formatting, wear and error correction overheads. Disks should carry a warning label "Storage is smaller than it appears".
-
@ryanc Depends on which definition you choose.
Marketers would accept 1000^4 and up, I'd expect 1024^4 bytes. Yours is a hybrid between the two, but either way I think you meant to say 1,048,576,000,000.
Then the whole mess of do you count formatting, wear and error correction overheads. Disks should carry a warning label "Storage is smaller than it appears".
@bbeaker no, I said what I meant
-
R relay@relay.infosec.exchange shared this topic
